Check, please! Yes, if we can reel this look in, I’m all-in.I think 1300m will approve of the PV location on the 06z GEFS.
February 20th'ish seems like it might be the day for a winter storm; if we get a winter storm.
View attachment 145066
Check, please! Yes, if we can reel this look in, I’m all-in.I think 1300m will approve of the PV location on the 06z GEFS.
February 20th'ish seems like it might be the day for a winter storm; if we get a winter storm.
View attachment 145066
Is that the MJO in 8 and 1? I’m trying to get better reading these maps.
Yea, it really joined the party with what the EPS/CMCE are showing.The 06z GEFS is one of the best looks we've seen so far leading up to this pattern.
Those 850s are still at fairly good spot for an ensemble mean at 15 days out. Also with the snow cover, one region that hasn’t been losing it has been southeast Canada and even northern interior New England… that’s important IMO because that’s the region we tap into for CAD.Cold air and 50/50 low trapped underneath GL Blocking with a low latitude southern stream. That's high-end potential stuff, but then it comes down to getting the details right.
View attachment 145087
Here is the 850 temp median with 10th percentile and 90th percentile point values at the end of the EPS run. The 0 deg run line runs from NE North Carolina to NE Kansas. What I would like to see is that line running from Charleston to Dallas.
How do we get there? Will the modeling trend colder? Will the GL block work farther southwest? Will the 50/50 be more expansive and farther south? Will those changes force the height pattern to drop farther south? Will the W Canada ridge be more potent and tap more cold air from the pole?
View attachment 145088
I'm not as big into snow cover as some others maybe, but these images don't help
View attachment 145089
View attachment 145090
View attachment 145092
I hear ya, but you and I both would rather be in a ‘great’ spot rather than a ‘fairly good’ one. Let’s see how things trendThose 850s are still at fairly good spot for an ensemble mean at 15 days out. Also with the snow cover, one region that hasn’t been losing it has been southeast Canada and even northern interior New England… that’s important IMO because that’s the region we tap into for CAD.
The way that the gefs rolled that pattern forward with the retrograding NAO, the pv pulling east, and the +height anom north of barrow it has to be checking boxes for higher end events across parts of the region.I think 1300m will approve of the PV location on the 06z GEFS.
February 20th'ish seems like it might be the day for a winter storm; if we get a winter storm.
View attachment 145066
When looking at the teleconnections, if I were to imagine what a 500mb and 850mb progression would look like, this is it.Extending the Euro Op run past day 10 with the control run shows the colder pathway with intense block and 50/50 low couplet (and initial sharp western ridge)
![]()
![]()
The snowpack in the Midwest/Plains should start rebuilding this week.Cold air and 50/50 low trapped underneath GL Blocking with a low latitude southern stream. That's high-end potential stuff, but then it comes down to getting the details right.
View attachment 145087
Here is the 850 temp median with 10th percentile and 90th percentile point values at the end of the EPS run. The 0 deg run line runs from NE North Carolina to NE Kansas. What I would like to see is that line running from Charleston to Dallas.
How do we get there? Will the modeling trend colder? Will the GL block work farther southwest? Will the 50/50 be more expansive and farther south? Will those changes force the height pattern to drop farther south? Will the W Canada ridge be more potent and tap more cold air from the pole?
View attachment 145088
I'm not as big into snow cover as some others maybe, but these images don't help
View attachment 145089
View attachment 145090
View attachment 145092
It’s cute and all to gaze at the day 12+ ensembles but eventually we going to need some op runs with the magic.
This ain’t it.
View attachment 144943
I still agree with you in principle. I’m tired of seeing pretty ensemble means. I want to see a promising pattern with the key features in place inside D5 on the deterministics.let's try this one again....pattern change is cute and all until the OP's start spewing snow where we want it. Last time I ran my mouth on this the GFS heard me.
Yeah, even with these heights over Alaska, they’re modeled a big warm up next weekend… Fairbanks for example is modeled to have highs in the 20s by the end of next weekend. Typically when you see a warm up like that in the interior of Alaska this time of the year, the cold is headed southeastGetting difficult for me to poo poo the upcoming pattern change...the EPS has brought this to day 11-12 now and looks legit. Displaced Aleutian low. One thing I want to see is lipstick red over AK.
Past 4 EPS runs centered on 2/16
View attachment 145097
Yeah, even with these heights over Alaska, they’re modeled a big warm up next weekend… Fairbanks for example is modeled to have highs in the 20s by the end of next weekend. Typically when you see a warm up like that in the interior of Alaska this time of the year, the cold is headed southeast
I don't want to overthink/analyze day 10+ GFS op runs but they diverge so much from it's ensembles. The op day 10+ stretches/splits the PV and sends a piece to Quebec/Newfoundland and sends the other part to British Columbia. That would be awful.I still agree with you in principle. I’m tired of seeing pretty ensemble means. I want to see a promising pattern with the key features in place inside D5 on the deterministics.
What do you mean? It goes positive mid next week and stays positive for the rest of the month into March.Should we be concerned with such a short window of +PNA? Looks narrow
He’s probably referencing that GFS Op runWhat do you mean? It goes positive mid next week and stays positive for the rest of the month into March.
Oh. I thought he was referring to the ENS. I’m not too concerned about the GFS OP run considering it changes every run. I’d be more concerned if the ENS start consistently showing it honestly.He’s probably referencing that GFS Op run
Regardless of what it shows, I think a heavy lean on the EPS Mean is the way to go for now. That's usually a good play anytime, but especially so with El Nino / Split Flow / High Latitude Blocking. Also, I feel like the Euro suite has had the hot hand this winter when models have diverged.I don't want to overthink/analyze day 10+ GFS op runs but they diverge so much from it's ensembles. The op day 10+ stretches/splits the PV and sends a piece to Quebec/Newfoundland and sends the other part to British Columbia. That would be awful.
But it's the OP, it doesn't show what we want so we toss...
View attachment 145106
Can we not clutch the GEPS...I like this one. I can only imagine the snow mean.Regardless of what it shows, I think a heavy lean on the EPS Mean is the way to go for now. That's usually a good play anytime, but especially so with El Nino / Split Flow / High Latitude Blocking. Also, I feel like the Euro suite has had the hot hand this winter when models have diverged.
This baja wave really has a southern slider look to it on all ensemble means....if if there is enough cold airCan we not clutch the GEPS...I like this one. I can only imagine the snow mean.
View attachment 145108
5 run temperature trend on the GEFS for Feb 16thTemps are always a concern but if this ain't cold enough...View attachment 145111