Nam0806
Member
Way too early to be making any final determinations on this one, really for anyone in the southeastern United States.starting to think this one is over...i know i know too early...but it looks horibly supressed
Way too early to be making any final determinations on this one, really for anyone in the southeastern United States.starting to think this one is over...i know i know too early...but it looks horibly supressed
If you wanted to draw up a look 150hrs out this would be it to a T. Feels like Christmas 2010 but with higher potentialDews are so low, as depicted all it would take is precip to amp up and the column would crash accross the board
I would say at 7 days out the track is not yet decidedGFS is so close to a nuke. I mean feet of fantasy snow into the Carolinas. It’s wild what we’re flirting with here View attachment 143923View attachment 143924View attachment 143922
Cold push still looks strong… very low dewpoints so any precip would crash the column. Again with that strong a STJ, suppression is the last of my worries. Getting that feed of cold/dry air most important18Z GFS not quite as suppressed, but less cold too.
Lot of potential herenot to beat a dead horse but GFS has some single digit dews to the SC/NC border with an already cold surface and a bomb lit in the gulf
At what point this week would you start getting concerned if you still saw suppression?Cold push still looks strong… very low dewpoints so any precip would crash the column. Again with that strong a STJ, suppression is the last of my worries. Getting that feed of cold/dry air most important
Exactly, personally at this range, I’m not even really paying attention to what the 2m temps look like. I’m focusing on the 500mb looks, 850 temps and surface dewpoints. The fact that single digit dewpoints are showing at the NC/SC border is the best indicator of just how strong the CAD potential is.not to beat a dead horse but GFS has some single digit dews to the SC/NC border with an already cold surface and a bomb lit in the gulf
Tuesday or WednesdayAt what point this week would you start getting concerned if you still saw suppression?
In all honesty about Friday… I know that seems close, but this just has all the earmarks of a set up that things trend NW considerably in the last 72 hours.At what point this week would you start getting concerned if you still saw suppression?
Christmas 2010In all honesty about Friday… I know that seems close, but this just has all the earmarks of a set up that things trend NW considerably in the last 72 hours.
Friday nightAt what point this week would you start getting concerned if you still saw suppression?
Yeah wouldn't take much for this to be much further NW that's for sureIn all honesty about Friday… I know that seems close, but this just has all the earmarks of a set up that things trend NW considerably in the last 72 hours.
Christmas 2010, February 2010, heck even January 2017… this is southern stream system with a strong STJ.Christmas 2010
Yeah, it's still cold enough. Verbatim, just barely from my perspective a couple of hundred miles to your SW.Cold push still looks strong… very low dewpoints so any precip would crash the column. Again with that strong a STJ, suppression is the last of my worries. Getting that feed of cold/dry air most important
The day ofAt what point this week would you start getting concerned if you still saw suppression?
All model providers show temperature maps and dewpoint maps, but for winter, what we really need are wet-bulb temperature maps. I think College of Dupage has some, but I swear it seems like they were inaccurate when I last viewed them (not sure though)Yeah, it's still cold enough. Verbatim, just barely from my perspective a couple of hundred miles to your SW.
View attachment 143926
What’s the wet-bulb math? I guess I could Google it but is there an easier way to calculate on the fly?All model providers show temperature maps and dewpoint maps, but for winter, what we really need are wet-bulb temperature maps. I think College of Dupage has some, but I swear it seems like they were inaccurate when I last viewed them (not sure though)
I think it's a little confusing/messy looking because the models have been advertising two surface low-pressure systems initially.Looks like a bit of a split with the low locations.
![]()
Maybe it’s just me but I feel like I hate dealing with that typical frontal crap that hinders our cold air from sinking south. Give me a deepening low to pull that cold air in and vaccum that cold air southwardMuch more consensus with the lows in the gulf this run. This is taking away most of the members that had the precip stretched across the Tennessee valley. This at least delays some of the initial precip and have to depend on a strengthening gulf low instead of overrunning.
![]()
Always heard take the difference between temp and dewpoint and divide by 3. Then subtract that from temp. So 38 degrees with a dew of 20 would be wet bulb of 32What’s the wet-bulb math? I guess I could Google it but is there an easier way to calculate on the fly?
Temp of 30 and Dewpoint of 20 is a wet-bulb of 27.....so rough estimate would be 70% between the 2 (i.e. more than half)What’s the wet-bulb math? I guess I could Google it but is there an easier way to calculate on the fly?
agree.but still timeRight now supression is on the table if we dont get phasing or less supressive 50/50 low. Very volatile setup. y
Sent from my SM-A236U using Tapatalk
Having read your insights for many years, first on American Wx and now here, this gets me as interested in the possibilities with this threat as anything elseSolid 50/50 low and a robust southern wave.. odds are pretty good this will trend toward a text book snowstorm for the SE.
You can see from the H5 set up that the strongest cold push is going down the east side of the mountains in a CAD fashion before the storm even arrives. The flow around the storm helps to lock in the CAD and pull more cold air in.I keep hearing folks refer to CAD here. But with a strong low off the coast pulling down cold air, it seems to me this really isn’t a case of CAD. Sure “CAD” areas may be in the best area to get snow, but it really has nothing to do with CAD. There are plenty of times CAD areas get snow that have nothing to do with CAD. What am I missing?
TW
What about Jan 11’Christmas 2010, February 2010, heck even January 2017… this is southern stream system with a strong STJ.
When wow speaks people should listen.Solid 50/50 low and a robust southern wave.. odds are pretty good this will trend toward a text book snowstorm for the SE.
The thing is that even if we never actually see a phase or if it’s just a bit later, I still think this has a very good chance to trend further north in the Gulf. Like Webb and others have pointed out, we’re dealing with southern stream energy in a very strong STJ. A great example would be the Christmas 2010 storm. The phase didn’t occurs until later as it fired up the low off the coast on Christmas night, but before that during the day, the southern stream wave that fed into the low trended considerably north in the last 24 hours and set up an overrunning event for northern Alabama, northern GA, Tennessee and western NC/SC.Right now supression is on the table if we dont get phasing or less supressive 50/50 low. Very volatile setup.
Sent from my SM-A236U using Tapatalk
Lol I betLike to see a phase to the west and to see and a slightly more inland to get more of the board involved.