pcbjr
Member
next winter ...What’s it going to take to get the -EPO to pair with a +PNA?
next winter ...What’s it going to take to get the -EPO to pair with a +PNA?
the CAE one as well
How about the SER scenario? Am I wrong by saying that the EPS has a bias of keeping the SER too long instead of breaking it down if there is a trough to the west?The key is getting the ridge to be centered over or north of Alaska, the -PNA will break down if this occurs and the big Hudson Bay vortex would slide further south. Very subtle changes to the character of a -EPO turn one of the worst patterns for snow to an amazing one
How about the SER scenario? Am I wrong by saying that the EPS has a bias of keeping the SER too long instead of breaking it down if there is a trough to the west?
Sent from my SM-J727U using Tapatalk
00z gfs has snow near Brent next Wednesday
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
R/s line will be in Dayton Ohio by 12z Saturday..watchGotta love the western Atlantic ridge View attachment 32580
Had lots of overrunning potential in about a week ... some big ice members some small some more snow than others some all rain ... interesting set up .. we just gotta keep beating that ridge BACK
Travis Co. Mauler...
Winter 2023-24 probably ? in all seriousness tho maybe we’re just going to have to hope for those big high pressure to come down from the arctic .. -EPO better late than never I hopelol when do we start?
View attachment 32590
This is from the latest CFS through mid Feb. 500mb pattern doesn't look that good, higher heights surrounding the PV, the deeper colder air would be confined from the mid latitudes into the higher latitudes. Nice Alaska blocking, but you can see some ridging in the Southeastern US. "Battle zone" would be northwest and west of the Southeastern US. 2m temp anomalies look to be about average, slightly below average depending on where you're located and above normal for Florida.Hey CFS from two weeks ago? Where are you now, where are you now.
I'm predicting that for February, overall temps will be seasonal with some transitional warm and cold shots. The map below is the long term average from those years through the months Feb to April. I'm just using that map as an idea as to how the temps I think will turn out overall this month. I'm also using February, 1993 as an analog. During that year, the Southeastern US experienced average temps overall.
View attachment 32588
The map below is the 700mb mean geopotenital heights from Feb, 1993 and we could see a dominating pattern similar to the one back in 1993 of February. (The map is from Gerald Bell and Allan Basist.)
View attachment 32591
Signs continue to show that the STJ will remain active, so overall, I'm going with above normal precipitation for at least the next two weeks. The best bet for frozen precipitation would be for the higher elevations. I think it's going to be difficult for the area's outside of the mountains to get any type of winter storm. As long as the subtropical jet is amplified, the deep cold air would have a difficult time reaching south and east. That's not always the case, but factoring in the combination of an active southern branch and southeastern ridging, the "battle zone" sets up.
The ENSO is still neutral, and is projected to do so. Neutral ENSO conditions do have the characteristics of Nino conditions.
View attachment 32593
It's possible the pattern changes quickly just before spring, and arctic air plummets south and east and we just might score a good winter storm in March. In the mean time, the pattern still doesn't look all that good for deep long lasting cold or winter storms in the Southeastern US.
Using 1895-2000 likely brings us much closer to reality and the increasingly evident underlying tendency (for coast-to-coast warmth)That's not an ENSO neutral pattern and that's also not the characteristics of a NINO pattern. It's a NINA pattern w/ an active subtropical jet. Also, when you make composites, make sure you use a base period that's actually relevant for the years you're analyzing. If you have a bunch of "analogs" in the 60s and 70s, don't use 1981-2010 like you did here. Why? Your composite will be biased cold. Use 1951-2010 or possibly even 1895-2000
I thought the West was receiving trough after trough all winter long? Has the source regions of these troughs just been that bad cold wise or were the interludes between these troughs just very warm? Or both. I know pacific SST,s have been basically AN pretty much everywhere also and I know that can’t help.Season to date US climate division temperature and precipitation ranks. Much of the US is running both a top 20 warmest and wettest winter on record. I'm willing to bet the SE US ranks get even higher after February is complete.
View attachment 32600
View attachment 32601
Is it out to lunch or is the NAM picking up on what the globals can’t see?
NAM says may need to come away from the mountains to chase. Wilkes special!
The more I look, the main difference in the NAM and global guidance is that the NAM throws precip back against the mountains and the Globals really don’t