SnowNotHappen
Member
I really wish that we could get a storm that all models would agree on. LOL
I haven't looked but what is the mean amount near MCN? And that corridor
I really wish that we could get a storm that all models would agree on. LOL
Just under 0.10" qpf MCN area.
Thank you! So the op and ens are at odds. I Think we all have to remember, myself certainly included, that we all think about snow and how much damage a few inches can cause. Well, a .25" of ZR is definitely enough to cause some issues for sure. Specially with winds up a bit
I remember the Christmas 2010 storm looked great about a week out, then it went poof and came back around on the models 48 hours out. Hope that's happening again.
Hmm not sure where you got your maps from but wxbell is showing more than double that
Actually most of that precip falls in about 24 hours, but yea I see what you're sayingMy maps are from MDA. I think I see where much of the discrepancy is coming from. I did just the 48 hour period ending at 12Z on 12/30 whereas it appears you did the 126 hours ending 18Z on 12/30, a longer period that I think incorporates an earlier wave. I redid my 48 hours to end at 6Z 12/30 and get exactly 0.10" at MCN. My 120 hour map to either 12Z or 18Z on 12/30 gives MCN close to 0.20". So, there is about 0.10" that falls before 6Z on 12/28, which I believe is before the wave being analyzed.
lol it's a little too early to pull the plug on isentropic lift in the midlands especially when your right on the NW border of the heaviest precip in an overrunning eventA snippet from CAE's latest discussion: (they literally put DRY in all caps)
12z guidance continues to suggest considerable uncertainty for a
possible winter storm Thursday into Friday. The last two runs of
the ECMWF are DRY. The Canadian is now DRY. Little change in GFS
model. Ensemble guidance pops show large spread. No significant
changes to forecast at this time.
The last two runs of the ECMWF and its ensemble suggest a much
lower threat with moisture and low pressure development
southeast of the area and no isentropic lift.
A snippet from CAE's latest discussion: (they literally put DRY in all caps)
Shawn whats your opinion on this for us? think we should move on to next one?
12z guidance continues to suggest considerable uncertainty for a
possible winter storm Thursday into Friday. The last two runs of
the ECMWF are DRY. The Canadian is now DRY. Little change in GFS
model. Ensemble guidance pops show large spread. No significant
changes to forecast at this time.
The last two runs of the ECMWF and its ensemble suggest a much
lower threat with moisture and low pressure development
southeast of the area and no isentropic lift.
@Spurs up . I think we should have moved on to the next a while back. ZR is lame.
well hopefully it will be very little icing
Now we are in a situation where crap could start icing over with little to no warning. Real talk.
Hopefully the wedge is deep enough to where it's just sleet there for whatever precip falls@Spurs up . I think we should have moved on to the next a while back. ZR is lame.
Now we are in a situation where crap could start icing over with little to no warning. Real talk.
For the 28th or 29thNam doenst look bad if you live in Ga or the upstate. It’s very close and would be snow
I am speaking about wave #2, this run sucks and is dry too.
Ouchlol, this is simulated radar too:
![]()
We tossThe 18Z NAM only gives SAV its worst icestorm since Jan of 1922. No biggie.
Perhaps we need a dec 27 threadThe NW trend is in full force on the NAM for our Wednesday wave... What looked like virtually nothing w/ a shortwave suppressed into oblivion off the SE US coast (like our 28-29th storm has become), a few days later, this is beginning to turn into legitimate event on some NWP models. Just another reason not to throw in the towel just yet for our storm on Thu/Fri. Give it another day or two
View attachment 2294