How similar or disimilar is this run compared to the CMC, setup wise?
How similar or disimilar is this run compared to the CMC, setup wise?
Could this just be a typical model bias if suppressing and underestimating precipitation only to bring it back 2 to 3 days before like back in early December?
Well we may have just missed out on another event then. Back to chasing this wild goose winter storm..Two reasons arguing against the NW trend. Strong CAD signature and late starting system (most likely triggered by isentropic lifting mechanisms). There's no real solid area of SFC LP, just classic overrunning.
Far from over dude!Well we may have just missed out on another event then. Back to chasing this wild goose winter storm..
Thats an increase around here. Def. a bit colder and more qpf Hell, .25-.50" of ZR would be bad enough
I want sleet...that is all!Thats an increase around here. Def. a bit colder and more qpf Hell, .25-.50" of ZR would be bad enough
This. I went back to look at the early December thread and try to compare what it put out around this same time frame. Main precip axis was further South and East compared to what actually transpired from what I can tell. When it comes to QPF totals best bet is to wait till we are in the 12KM and especially 3KM NAMs range (and other short range guidance especially RGEM) which will be soon. IIRC I think NAM was first to have the heavier snow axis further N/NW than the global and ensembles to. General idea from 12Z runs is the cold will be there and threat of major ZR system for CAD areas (maybe even areas not as pron to big CAD events) is increasingly plausible. QPF will work its self out and if general NW trend occurs like we see in regards to majority SE storms at this range, could be bad for CAD areas.Euro was wayyyyyy to dry with the early December storm fwiw...