WeatherAddiction
Member
Hoping to see the southern trend continue today sending the low into the gulf so those of us further south have a better chance at avoiding the WAA
Last year's Dec storm over performed all the way back into Texas and probably was a earlier onset by 4-5 hours that Friday morningYes it would. Plus, in my experience with winter storms if they start out better/earlier than expected they tend to overperform. If you wake up in the morning and the precip is still to your west, it’s going to be a dud.
1st and very most important is we need the high to quick being slow and actually anchor in before the arrival precipitation . I know temps will be under forecasted and they will end up a bit colder but that's only IF we get that high to build in before the precip. If we DONT (IMHO) nobody outside WNC (and prob central NC) into the upstate are going to like the outcome.
For my GA and Bama and TN friends....we HAVE to hope and rely on that upper low to drop south over us like yesterday's runs or this is just a very cold rain this time. Just my 2 cents for now. On to the 12z runs .
The EPS does too...This is probably the single most important thing to nail down.
The gfs and fv3 don’t really establish a big CAD before the storm. The NAM does.
This is a major discrepancy.
View attachment 8411
Later today and tomorrowWhen will this wave be sampled and that data be put into the models?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That could be our ticket, as Eric mentioned and I've seen it many times too, that transition takes longer and can easily pick up a couple inches or so on the front side. CAD are funYeah you can see the models starting to hint at an initial shot of precip well ahead of the system see the nam below. If we can get that into the area and it go to town and wetbulb the column this becomes a completely different system for us
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
And I would tend to believe the NAM for now because the EURO is showing about the same. I will say both the Nam and euro trended better about getting that high over and in place quicker that's super keyThis is probably the single most important thing to nail down.
The gfs and fv3 don’t really establish a big CAD before the storm. The NAM does.
This is a major discrepancy.
View attachment 8411
The placement of the HP on the NAM is a massive difference. If there is some way to get that banana HP to set up shop, its game on in the South....but it is the LR NAM....like taking the GFS at 384hr.. just doesnt usually end well.Look at how much colder the NAM is at 850. Over Carolinas but also NW of the storm
View attachment 8412
Agreed and not just because it's "wishcasting" but I'd lean that way too: 1) the NAM is pretty good with synoptic setup 2) the EPS leaning that way 3) and with a good HP in the right location a CAD wedge is notorious for being colder, stronger and more expansiveAnd I would tend to believe the NAM for now because the EURO is showing about the same. I will say both the Nam and euro trended better about getting that high over and in place quicker that's super key
Agreed and not just because it's "wishcasting" but I'd lean that way too: 1) the NAM is pretty good with synoptic setup 2) the EPS leaning that way 3) and with a good HP in the right location a CAD wedge is notorious for being colder, stronger and more expansive
Agreed. I think some folks are getting too caught up in the footprint of snow on the map. It may have a northward expansion due to phasing that can help the mid-atlantic. As long as the track of the low across the gulf and off the SE coast doesn't change, there will be a major storm for many of us. I do think it will trend colder at the surface at least with the CAD. I'll be interested to see if there will be major accumulations of ice and who will get it.I'll never forget how a few years ago models were showing a nice snowstorm for most of NC, the NAM got in range and showed the rain/snow line west of Raleigh and people said it was wrong and had no idea how to handle the synoptic setup. It ended up nailing that transition zone and globals, even the Euro, never really caught up. Once we get in it's range tomorrow afternoon and the RGEM those two models will be the go to models in my book. This setup is honestly the type that can trend colder instead of warmer because of the CAD and HP strength/position.
I don't like that last frame but I like the general idea. I'm excited to see where models converge on the depth and south push of the coldPersonally I like the ICON trend...
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Agreed. I think some folks are getting too caught up in the footprint of snow on the map. It may have a northward expansion due to phasing that can help the mid-atlantic. As long as the track of the low across the gulf and off the SE coast doesn't change, there will be a major storm for many of us. I do think it will trend colder at the surface at least with the CAD. I'll be interested to see if there will be major accumulations of ice and who will get it.