• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern Dazzling December

00z CFS ensemble mean 500 mb
4444dda0c42633ee2d146c6dffbe0a88.jpg


Sent from my SM-A136U1 using Tapatalk
 
Miller B's can produce but CAD situations are nothing to be really excited about for my part of the mountains. The CAD is very close but blocked by the range of mountains that are over 4000ft just to our east. 33F and rain is the name of the game for CAD for us.

A nice Miller A with cold air in place would be awesome but damn. These models are going to have a hard time for a few more "minutes".
 
CAD folks.. intepret this how you wish

View attachment 125162
Responding to your post from yesterday afternoon. As we all know the overnight runs now show a colder solution for CAD areas. That may still not work out for a lot of us, but the real point is we can't believe any model details out past day 7 (or even less). --> A suggestion to everybody; we should create a thread that only focuses on model runs and forecast that are less than day 7.
 
I think the GFS is a bit extreme but the thing about raging -NAOs is they have the effect of spiking the punch bowl, it opens the door for extreme solutions. nice to have a thing to look at.
Responding to your post from yesterday afternoon. As we all know the overnight runs now show a colder solution for CAD areas. That may still not work out for a lot of us, but the real point is we can't believe any model details out past day 7 (or even less). --> A suggestion to everybody; we should create a thread that only focuses on model runs and forecast that are less than day 7.
I have and continue to maintain a sunnier view of models; they aren't perfect but both the long range accuracy, as well as the ability of ensembles to generally illuminate the range of possibilities at hand, are remarkable in my opinion. Shifts like this are perfectly reasonable to me.
 
I think the GFS is a bit extreme but the thing about raging -NAOs is they have the effect of spiking the punch bowl, it opens the door for extreme solutions. nice to have a thing to look at.

I have and continue to maintain a sunnier view of models; they aren't perfect but both the long range accuracy, as well as the ability of ensembles to generally illuminate the range of possibilities at hand, are remarkable in my opinion. Shifts like this are perfectly reasonable to me.
Yeah, I guess folks here take that into account. It's just the rollercoaster of changes that have been depicted over the last couple of weeks have been maddening. If we had a hard cutoff of (say) 7 days, then have good folks like you provide some analysis, forecast perspective might be a little less chaotic. But it's all good...
 
Way out there so almost noise range but if that is an anchored or building HP (1033) and not retreating could be a winner. My guess is it's transient though. We'll see.
Yeah it’s so far out there that it’s meaningless, but you still love to see it shown regardless.
 
I think the GFS is a bit extreme but the thing about raging -NAOs is they have the effect of spiking the punch bowl, it opens the door for extreme solutions. nice to have a thing to look at.

I have and continue to maintain a sunnier view of models; they aren't perfect but both the long range accuracy, as well as the ability of ensembles to generally illuminate the range of possibilities at hand, are remarkable in my opinion. Shifts like this are perfectly reasonable to me.
The gfs had traditionally been awful at picking up on CAD set ups and specifics. Maybe this updated version will be really good for CAD???
 
Yeah, I guess folks here take that into account. It's just the rollercoaster of changes that have been depicted over the last couple of weeks have been maddening. If we had a hard cutoff of (say) 7 days, then have good folks like you provide some analysis, forecast perspective might be a little less chaotic. But it's all good...
also worth mentioning that despite me being a cheerleader i'll acknowledge models will be handicapped a little next few weeks with shorter wavelengths and a more amplified pattern. idk where to find those model verification charts but i would bet you'll see a dip from here onward as the models grapple with a weirder than average pattern. so i think the complaint of "man what the hell these models are way too wishy washy" is more relevant than usual
 
When the ICON is even trending this way at this lead time, that’s a warning bell for me.

Curious if that holds the next few runs. As you allude to, the ICON has a pretty nasty warm bias, and if even this model is hinting at CAD-induced ZR/IP, that's definitely a red flag.
 
At this range, you can easily knock off 5 degrees in that CAD. We saw that with the ICON in the first storm last January
Yep all the ops are not so good on cad, even euro. The warmest is always ICOn and usually Can Op catches on 1st, sane with RGEM verse NAM. CAN OP to its credit was sniffing this out past couple days, not to the depth GFS is .
 
Not bad for the norther NC Piedmont northwards. This was actually a better run for RDU and eastward:
View attachment 125254
Would expect a continued backing off of this .. no snow pack to the north and our cut off is near Chicago .. I’ll take NW piedmont and predominantly Appalachian mountains for 600 please!
 
Back
Top