stephend122080
Member
00z CFS ensemble mean 500 mb
Sent from my SM-A136U1 using Tapatalk

Sent from my SM-A136U1 using Tapatalk
My yard is a swamp already, same for the pasteurs. Did a 180 and need some dry days.LR GFS suggests storm after storm after storm. There will be chances no doubt
The MA has to be drooling with this forecasted NAO/Block. They jackpotted in 2010 three separate times foot plus storms.woke up to latest GFS giving me 5 inches in my backyard, happy friday. can't begin to describe the relief i feel living north of roxboro
Responding to your post from yesterday afternoon. As we all know the overnight runs now show a colder solution for CAD areas. That may still not work out for a lot of us, but the real point is we can't believe any model details out past day 7 (or even less). --> A suggestion to everybody; we should create a thread that only focuses on model runs and forecast that are less than day 7.
I have and continue to maintain a sunnier view of models; they aren't perfect but both the long range accuracy, as well as the ability of ensembles to generally illuminate the range of possibilities at hand, are remarkable in my opinion. Shifts like this are perfectly reasonable to me.Responding to your post from yesterday afternoon. As we all know the overnight runs now show a colder solution for CAD areas. That may still not work out for a lot of us, but the real point is we can't believe any model details out past day 7 (or even less). --> A suggestion to everybody; we should create a thread that only focuses on model runs and forecast that are less than day 7.
Yeah, I guess folks here take that into account. It's just the rollercoaster of changes that have been depicted over the last couple of weeks have been maddening. If we had a hard cutoff of (say) 7 days, then have good folks like you provide some analysis, forecast perspective might be a little less chaotic. But it's all good...I think the GFS is a bit extreme but the thing about raging -NAOs is they have the effect of spiking the punch bowl, it opens the door for extreme solutions. nice to have a thing to look at.
I have and continue to maintain a sunnier view of models; they aren't perfect but both the long range accuracy, as well as the ability of ensembles to generally illuminate the range of possibilities at hand, are remarkable in my opinion. Shifts like this are perfectly reasonable to me.
Have the L just south of Mexico Beach and we all party.Christmas is finally in range on the GFS and the first run is workable? View attachment 125245
Way out there so almost noise range but if that is an anchored or building HP (1033) and not retreating could be a winner. My guess is it's transient though. We'll see.Christmas is finally in range on the GFS and the first run is workable? View attachment 125245
Yeah it’s so far out there that it’s meaningless, but you still love to see it shown regardless.Way out there so almost noise range but if that is an anchored or building HP (1033) and not retreating could be a winner. My guess is it's transient though. We'll see.
The gfs had traditionally been awful at picking up on CAD set ups and specifics. Maybe this updated version will be really good for CAD???I think the GFS is a bit extreme but the thing about raging -NAOs is they have the effect of spiking the punch bowl, it opens the door for extreme solutions. nice to have a thing to look at.
I have and continue to maintain a sunnier view of models; they aren't perfect but both the long range accuracy, as well as the ability of ensembles to generally illuminate the range of possibilities at hand, are remarkable in my opinion. Shifts like this are perfectly reasonable to me.
Hard for me to tell if that's an improvement for NC.
Also worth noting the ICON is usually pretty warm with 2m temps, just a bias it has.Icon trending to the GFS ?View attachment 125249
also worth mentioning that despite me being a cheerleader i'll acknowledge models will be handicapped a little next few weeks with shorter wavelengths and a more amplified pattern. idk where to find those model verification charts but i would bet you'll see a dip from here onward as the models grapple with a weirder than average pattern. so i think the complaint of "man what the hell these models are way too wishy washy" is more relevant than usualYeah, I guess folks here take that into account. It's just the rollercoaster of changes that have been depicted over the last couple of weeks have been maddening. If we had a hard cutoff of (say) 7 days, then have good folks like you provide some analysis, forecast perspective might be a little less chaotic. But it's all good...
When the ICON is even trending this way at this lead time, that’s a warning bell for me.Just ice for the escarpment, but pretty insane trend here View attachment 125251
At this range, you can easily knock off 5 degrees in that CAD. We saw that with the ICON in the first storm last JanuaryJust ice for the escarpment, but pretty insane trend here View attachment 125251
When the ICON is even trending this way at this lead time, that’s a warning bell for me.
Yep all the ops are not so good on cad, even euro. The warmest is always ICOn and usually Can Op catches on 1st, sane with RGEM verse NAM. CAN OP to its credit was sniffing this out past couple days, not to the depth GFS is .At this range, you can easily knock off 5 degrees in that CAD. We saw that with the ICON in the first storm last January
Looks like it backed off.
Not bad for the norther NC Piedmont northwards. This was actually a better run for RDU and eastward:
View attachment 125254
Would expect a continued backing off of this .. no snow pack to the north and our cut off is near Chicago .. I’ll take NW piedmont and predominantly Appalachian mountains for 600 please!Not bad for the norther NC Piedmont northwards. This was actually a better run for RDU and eastward:
View attachment 125254