Not impossible then we are waiting for a turn to cold around new years. There are some not so subtle similarities to last December in over all evolution right nowNot that I believe it, but here's the 18z GFS for the same time:
View attachment 125456
That would suck!
I also thought the NWS was throwing it out as well?James spann not considering the GFS
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah. It would shock me if the GFS ends up being correct. If it does it deserves more respectI also thought the NWS was throwing it out as well?
Are these 2m anomalies??Not that I believe it, but here's the 18z GFS for the same time:
View attachment 125456
That would suck!
Agreed luckily the gfs is so useless not even the CPC aren’t even regarding it anymore.. and they know a heck of a lot more than anyone here lolNot impossible then we are waiting for a turn to cold around new years. There are some not so subtle similarities to last December in over all evolution right now
Not that I believe it, but here's the 18z GFS for the same time:
View attachment 125456
That would suck!
I would love a repeat of that this winter.No one will ever pass the January 8th 1973 ice storm in Atlanta,,,It was a very compact isolated event basically right over the core of metro Atlanta,,,2 weeks without power,
Agreed luckily the gfs is so useless not even the CPC aren’t even regarding it anymore.. and they know a heck of a lot more than anyone here lol
We also need more 12z ICON than 18z ICON. It appears there is a crucial period (seen in the loop) where energy moving around the Pacific ridge either consolidates with our big low that sets the Atlantic OR buckles the western ridge by digging southwest under the Pacific ridge and sets up a Rex block and wrecks the Pacific pattern.We do really need the cutoff along the west coast to rex with the ridge or even retrograde under it and back toward AK. If it doesn't its likely to help entice the pv west and we end up with an ugly pattern. We need more 12z icon and less 18z gfs
67F low with clear skies here
What you’re saying is the angle of the cold is wrong? ?I think it’s what that cranky guy rain cold was talking about earlier. We like to see those higher heights through AK but the orientation is less than ideal. It extends diagonal out into the pacific instead of vertical up and down the west coast causing troughs to eject down into the west coast resulting in an unfavorable PNA. It’s a strange pattern. Something’s gonna give here soon on the modeling. I don’t think these things can all exist together unless they are only transient.
Climate prediction centerCPC?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You could have let me live happy and not shown the 18z Icon, I didn't look at it earlier now i feel like thisWe also need more 12z ICON than 18z ICON. It appears there is a crucial period (seen in the loop) where energy moving around the Pacific ridge either consolidates with our big low that sets the Atlantic OR buckles the western ridge by digging southwest under the Pacific ridge and sets up a Rex block and wrecks the Pacific pattern.
View attachment 125457
To get where we want to go, this may be the first crucial hurdle we have to clear (probably won't be the last).