pcbjr
Member
Quite a bit more ...It's more than just bypassing Hell.
Quite a bit more ...It's more than just bypassing Hell.
I just believe ... and I truly believe do unto others and love your God ... now I am Christian, but do not feel I have any business whatsoever faulting good folks who are not ... so long as they are good folks ... and if they are not and if I can help them, then all the better ... but I do not think it is good to force myself on anyone ... unless I just want to cause rebellion and hate ...
I understand but what defines someone as "good?"
Now we are into the age old question ... and I am not that far up the food chain to decide ... but I know "good" when it happens ... from me or to me ...
First, thanks for the compliment.Phil, I think you are an excellent poster, so I'm truly not meaning to be argumentive, but I echo Poimen's question here. I would personally agree with your description of "good," as would a lot of people. However, what about people who define good differently. Some people (a disturbing number in fact) think it is "good" to steal, hurt, rape, kill, etc. To them, gettting what you can, when you want is "good" and consistent with the animal world; therefore "natural." What makes our view of "good" any "better or more correct" than theirs? To have any real meaning behind the idea of being "good", there has to be a standard beyond what any of us think, otherwise it is just opinion.
So if "being good folks, as long as they are good folks" were enough, whoose opinion of "good folks' should we use to asses them with? Just because you or I think they are "good" does that make them so? Just because Hitler thought someone was "good" did that make them so?
First, thanks for the compliment.
Second, you ask an age old question and I might not be wise enough to answer, but from a pedestrian angle, I'll try ... I think society, or the overwhelming majority of people innately "know" what good is (that ability to somehow "know" being a gift from God, which sets us above the animal kingdom); I think the vast majority of people ingrain that "good" into base-line societal norms, and that we then as individuals somehow strive to exceed the baseline, and when we do, we're doing God's will on an everyday level; as to "bad" people who define their own "good" ... God also gifted us with free will and how we use that is the ultimate measuring stick from on high ... Don't know if this makes sense (but it does to me anyways) ...
I did not know that folks who were never exposed to Christianity could not go to heaven ... where are all the good folks who lived in Africa, North America, South America, Asia, Australia ... for say 1700 plus years? I do not recall Jesus saying that Moses and Abraham and Isaac (who could not have "accepted" Jesus, being before His time), or American/Native Indians or Australian Aborigines or Eskimos, or Cave people are/were banned ...
That’s my thinking also. We have a God that loves us but creates people to just go to hell? That’s why I don’t discuss my Christianity much or get into discussions. I believe people have to find what they believe and not what others believe. Everyone has a different interpretation of the scriptures and what they mean. No one can truly say their way is completely wo a doubt the correct way and beliefs. When I say completely I mean with living actual no doubt proof.
Thank you; we do have a small bit of a difference but what's that among friends?I would agree completely, and in fact, am arguing exactly that. Specifically, that the ability to truly define good can only come from a standard outside of ourselves (God). I also agree that most people have this knowledge, even if they choose to ignore it ("God's law is written in our hearts") yet some do not recognize that knowledge as coming from Him.
Perhaps I misunderstood your post, or at least the context of it. It sounded to me like you were presenting the view that "being good folks" was enough (to get to heaven; ie. One can get to heaven by being good) in the context of the conversation about folks in other parts of the world whom had never heard or whom had lived prior to Christ. In other words; if they had never heard the Gospel, but were good folks, they would go to heaven. I would not necessarily agree with that as I do not think "being good" delivers us back into God's presence (only the sacrifice of Jesus does). And further, if being good could, how would we define good? But I agree the standard is God, not personal opinion of what is good.
The Bible is the one absolute, empirical threshhold. For me it has the final say.Regarding the concept of "good", how can you know if you have been good enough? What's the empirical threshold? There has to be one, if this is the right answer.
I was talking about the viewpoint that good people are saved because they're good, though. What is the threshold for good? There has to be a line in the sand for this position to be valid: Good enough or not good enough.The Bible is the one absolute, empirical threshhold. For me it has the final say.
So I've asked this question in other forums and to friends and tend to get the same answer over and over so I'll ask it here. I may have already way earlier and dont remeber if I did or not.
What's the going take on the omnipotent paradox.
Can god create a stone he cannot lift?
The answer to the following question is the key to answering the above question: How many miles is the moon from Mother's Day?So I've asked this question in other forums and to friends and tend to get the same answer over and over so I'll ask it here. I may have already way earlier and dont remeber if I did or not.
What's the going take on the omnipotent paradox.
Can god create a stone he cannot lift?
So I've asked this question in other forums and to friends and tend to get the same answer over and over so I'll ask it here. I may have already way earlier and dont remeber if I did or not.
What's the going take on the omnipotent paradox.
Can god create a stone he cannot lift?
It's crazy, I never get an answer to this question.The answer to the following question is the key to answering the above question: How many miles is the moon from Mother's Day?
I grant you that it is a strange number given the circumstances, though it is four instead of three. I have no idea how these numbers are chosen.Does anyone find it unusual the number of this? Also that military will be ones delivering the vaccine? HR6666? Like how does that number even get picked.
![]()
COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act (2020 - H.R. 6666)
To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID-19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals' residences, and for other purposes.www.govtrack.us
I grant you that it is a strange number given the circumstances, though it is four instead of three. I have no idea how these numbers are chosen.
But this is likely no more a sign of the “mark of the beast” than your SS number or CC numbers, etc.
As with most things in Revelation, the mark of the beast is probably symbolic rather than a literal mark of some kind. Numbers play an important symbolic role in Revelation. If we keep in mind that “7” is the number of perfection in the Jewish mind, what then would three sixes symbolize? While we can’t say for certain, it seems likely that 666 represent a three-fold emphasis on imperfection, or something of the like.
What or who we worship is central in Revelation. Those who worship Christ worship that which is perfect; while those who worship the beast worship that which is the complete opposite of perfect and of Christ himself.
I prefer 777 on a certain lottery ticket ... but alas, I gamble $2.00 ...And further, Christians have no reason to fear the number 666. We've been given a spirit of sonship not fear! ?
YesIsn't the number 6 the number of man, biblically speaking?
The awesome complexity of the earth itself, as well as the infinite vastness of the universe (which man cannot even begin to comprehend), are silent witnesses of the existence and wisdom of a Master Creator. God designed and created the universe based on mathematical laws and numbers, principles that continue to govern the entire creation.'To whom then will you compare Me, or who is My equal?' says the Holy One. 'Lift up your eyes on high, and behold, who has created these things, who brings out their host by number' (Isaiah 40:25).
I never knew he laid "hands for healing" on anyone? I listen to his radio broadcast every week. You might be confusing him with someone else. Ravi is an extremely intelligent born again Christian who is of Indian decent. He is one of the most intelligent evangelists I know. Look up RZIM and see if this is the man you are referring to.Ravi Zacharias was an utter con man.. All that crap with 'laying hands' for healing? Give me a break. Zero respect.
To the first part, I agree with you 100%. That has nothing to do with the "mark of the beast". To the second bold part. Not so much...... There are many parts of the book of The Revelation that are literal and this is one of them.... There will in fact be a literal mark on the right hand or on the forehead. It will be needed to buy or sell during the tribulation period.... implying a cashless monetary system.I grant you that it is a strange number given the circumstances, though it is four instead of three. I have no idea how these numbers are chosen.
But this is likely no more a sign of the “mark of the beast” than your SS number or CC numbers, etc.
As with most things in Revelation, the mark of the beast is probably symbolic rather than a literal mark of some kind. Numbers play an important symbolic role in Revelation. If we keep in mind that “7” is the number of perfection in the Jewish mind, what then would three sixes symbolize? While we can’t say for certain, it seems likely that 666 represent a three-fold emphasis on imperfection, or something of the like.
What or who we worship is central in Revelation. Those who worship Christ worship that which is perfect; while those who worship the beast worship that which is the complete opposite of perfect and of Christ himself.
To the first part, I agree with you 100%. That has nothing to do with the "mark of the beast". To the second bold part. Not so much...... There are many parts of the book of The Revelation that are literal and this is one of them.... There will in fact be a literal mark on the right hand or on the forehead. It will be needed to buy or sell during the tribulation period.... implying a cashless monetary system.
Common sense..... Come on man.... surely your smarter than that. An identification mark that will be used for commerce is not apocalyptic literature. Now a beast rising up out of the sea having seven heads and ten horns is symbolic.How do you determine which symbols to interpret literally and vice versa?
Lol understanding Revelation is not quite as simple as common sense. Some things are easy, but there are more than a few "symbols" that extraordinary scholars disagree on, in terms of interpretation. And there's quite a bit of disagreement on the simple things too, mind you.Common sense..... Come on man.... surely your smarter than that. An identification mark that will be used for commerce is not apocalyptic literature. Now a beast rising up out of the sea having seven heads and ten horns is symbolic.
Common sense..... Come on man.... surely your smarter than that. An identification mark that will be used for commerce is not apocalyptic literature. Now a beast rising up out of the sea having seven heads and ten horns is symbolic.
Spot on. The poster has no clue who hes referencing.I never knew he laid "hands for healing" on anyone? I listen to his radio broadcast every week. You might be confusing him with someone else. Ravi is an extremely intelligent born again Christian who is of Indian decent. He is one of the most intelligent evangelists I know. Look up RZIM and see if this is the man you are referring to.