bouncycorn
Meteorologist
Snowfall n of i-20 @ 171. Still need a stronger s/w... but this run is much better than 06z.
bouncycorn link said:Not sure I agree with the GFS on 850 temps. Strong 1032 block to our north and the cold air is displaced by a very weak low? Yeah, not gonna happen. If this solution occured, I'd say 1-2" right along i-20.
Webberweather53 link said:We definitely want the cold/suppressed look this far in advance esp on the GFS...
LovesSnowHatesRidges link said:[quote author=Webberweather53 link=topic=80.msg5453#msg5453 date=1483201293]
We definitely want the cold/suppressed look this far in advance esp on the GFS...
LovesSnowHatesRidges link said:[quote author=Webberweather53 link=topic=80.msg5453#msg5453 date=1483201293]
We definitely want the cold/suppressed look this far in advance esp on the GFS...
suppression is last on my list of concerns at the moment .bouncycorn link said:Suppression in this range is actually odd. Usually the models start showing suppression early (like 210hrs+ out) then lose and system this far out and it's off of our minds. I'm seriously concerned that we actually see suppression when push comes to shove. Still will have to continue to monitor closely.