• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry 1/20 - 1/23 Winter Storm

I know it hasn't been as cold leading up to the event, however remember is 2014 it only took an inch of snow to shut down northern GA.
Yeah but I think the difference here is that temps aren’t supposed to be below freezing until seemingly most moisture is gone. In 2014 we were in the upper 20s while snow was falling. That was like the perfect recipe for disaster. Not saying there can’t be issues tomorrow but things would have to really crank for their to be problems like that.
 
Yeah but I think the difference here is that temps aren’t supposed to be below freezing until seemingly most moisture is gone. In 2014 we were in the upper 20s while snow was falling. That was like the perfect recipe for disaster. Not saying there can’t be issues tomorrow but things would have to really crank for their to be problems like that.
I remember one of the Atl NWS mets saying that there has only been 2 times when there was accumulating snow in Atlanta during the daytime with temperatures dropping into the mid-20's - both snowjams ('82 / '14)
 
Per KCHS, they're going more towards the NAM thermal profiles on low level cold advection crashing SFC Temps a bit quicker than shown from other modeling (due to NAM performance of wedges better than most). Savannah probably escapes a lot of icing... probably up to .1" but if 00z and overnight trends continue, I really believe ice storm warnings may replace the current advisory in the Quad Counties in SC...

Yeah, I guess it is a battle between the very slow warming trends of most models with the westward shift of precip vs most models not handing well the low level cold of strong wedges giving NAM and CMC/RGEM an advantage. Will be close, regardless.

We should get a better idea by looking to your north tomorrow morning at how fast temperatures are cooling as the wedge advances vs models.

I’ll also be closely watching CHS because in situations like this SAV will usually get within 1-2 of KCHS eventually albeit delayed.
 
I think that's the criteria and it could (and likely will) be met but the Wakefield NWS is pretty conservative and I doubt they'll issue one
The 3 hr visibility thing might be the hardest to meet. (falling/blowing sn) But I am just speculating. Good luck though. It's rare to even be in a position to consider if that kind of warning is a possibility.
 
The 3 hr visibility thing might be the hardest to meet. (falling/blowing sn) But I am just speculating. Good luck though. It's rare to even be in a position to consider if that kind of warning is a possibility.
Southeastern Virginia's been pretty lucky with snowstorms recently (besides the past 3 years), we got back to back blizzard warnings after none for 40 years in 2017 and 2018, crazy to think even the possibility might be there again now
 
I remember one of the Atl NWS mets saying that there has only been 2 times when there was accumulating snow in Atlanta during the daytime with temperatures dropping into the mid-20's - both snowjams ('82 / '14)
32 here right now

Yep. Will never forget that day. If anyone is up for a stroll down memory lane. Starts to get interesting around page 8 haha

 
Yeah, I guess it is a battle between the very slow warming trends of most models with the westward shift of precip vs most models not handing well the low level cold of strong wedges giving NAM and CMC/RGEM an advantage. Will be close, regardless.

We should get a better idea by looking to your north tomorrow morning at how fast temperatures are cooling as the wedge advances vs models.

I’ll also be closely watching CHS because in situations like this SAV will usually get within 1-2 of KCHS eventually albeit delayed.

Indeed. The current winter weather advisory starts here at 1pm tomorrow until 3am Saturday morning. Temp is starting to fall at a faster rate plus it's starting to get breezy from N and NNE.
Hard to believe after I hit 73 today.
 
Hm some raw CAE output... like the higher than 10:1 rates showing up... 5.1 inches per gfs and 2.5 nam

00z GFS:

Code:
220122/0000Z  24  03008KT  28.7F  SNPL   10:1| 0.3|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.031   10:1|  0.3|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.03   71| 29|  0
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
220122/0100Z  25  03007KT  28.1F  SNOW   15:1| 0.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.061   14:1|  1.3|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.09  100|  0|  0
220122/0200Z  26  04007KT  27.9F  SNOW   12:1| 0.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.049   13:1|  1.9|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.14  100|  0|  0
220122/0300Z  27  02006KT  27.8F  SNOW   15:1| 0.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.056   14:1|  2.7|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.20  100|  0|  0
220122/0400Z  28  02008KT  27.4F  SNOW   17:1| 1.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.067   14:1|  3.8|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.26  100|  0|  0
220122/0500Z  29  03007KT  27.2F  SNOW   15:1| 0.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.059   15:1|  4.7|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.32  100|  0|  0
220122/0600Z  30  03007KT  27.0F  SNOW   11:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.039   14:1|  5.1|| 0.02|| 0.00|| 0.36  100|  0|  0

00z NAM:

Code:
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
220122/0100Z  25  02009KT  29.2F  FZRA    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.03|| 0.027    0:1|  0.0|| 0.00|| 0.03|| 0.03    0|  0|100
220122/0200Z  26  01008KT  29.2F  SNPL    2:1| 0.1|| 0.07|| 0.00|| 0.041    2:1|  0.1|| 0.07|| 0.03|| 0.07   11| 89|  0
220122/0300Z  27  01009KT  29.6F  SNOW   16:1| 0.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.046    9:1|  0.8|| 0.07|| 0.03|| 0.11  100|  0|  0
220122/0400Z  28  01009KT  28.8F  SNOW   14:1| 0.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.052   11:1|  1.5|| 0.07|| 0.03|| 0.17  100|  0|  0
220122/0500Z  29  02008KT  28.8F  SNOW   16:1| 0.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.043   12:1|  2.2|| 0.07|| 0.03|| 0.21  100|  0|  0
220122/0600Z  30  03009KT  29.0F  SNOW   10:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.028   12:1|  2.5|| 0.07|| 0.03|| 0.24  100|  0|  0
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
 
1/28/14 is my favorite storm. It turned Atlanta into a damn zoo lol and over performed.
I wish there were a way to go back and view model data from back then. I don't even remember what models showed beforehand. I remember a winter storm watch then warning was issued for southern metro ATL counties the day before the event and then expanded to the rest of metro Atlanta the morning of the event.

If this event overperforms and causes similar issues in Atlanta, it'd be one of the biggest model fails in recent memory.
 
I wish there were a way to go back and view model data from back then. I don't even remember what models showed beforehand. I remember a winter storm watch then warning was issued for southern metro ATL counties the day before the event and then expanded to the rest of metro Atlanta the morning of the event.

If this event overperforms and causes similar issues in Atlanta, it'd be one of the biggest model fails in recent memory.
You can use the Tigge dataset from ECMWF that archives past model runs if you want code it up. You could also probably read through old American threads.
 
I wish there were a way to go back and view model data from back then. I don't even remember what models showed beforehand. I remember a winter storm watch then warning was issued for southern metro ATL counties the day before the event and then expanded to the rest of metro Atlanta the morning of the event.

If this event overperforms and causes similar issues in Atlanta, it'd be one of the biggest model fails in recent memory.

What do you think about the current model data? I feel like with the moisture profiles, there's definitely room for this event to 'overperform' for some of N GA.
 
I wish there were a way to go back and view model data from back then. I don't even remember what models showed beforehand. I remember a winter storm watch then warning was issued for southern metro ATL counties the day before the event and then expanded to the rest of metro Atlanta the morning of the event.

If this event overperforms and causes similar issues in Atlanta, it'd be one of the biggest model fails in recent memory.
The models had the sweet spot for Macon-Warner Robins until 36 hours before the event, when they started to shift North. They still whiffed pretty bad.
 
What do you think about the current model data? I feel like with the moisture profiles, there's definitely room for this event to 'overperform' for some of N GA.
These events tend to over-perform in terms of precip northwest of the low/overrunning. I think parts of east-central GA have a chance for some accumulating snow along with the NEGA mountains. In terms of anything for the ATL Metro, flurries only. Could be some "heavier" flurries but nothing accumulating.

The models have done pretty bad with this system, though. Sorta makes me really think that volcano last week is having a major effect on global modelling for the time being. It's not just this system that models are struggling with.
 
Euro out to 24, and it's following along with the trends of the other models of digging more vorticity into the backside of the trough. Won't be a huge difference probably, but it's there
 
Here's the difference at the surface on the Euro at hr27

Tzpiqc6.gif
 
I wish there were a way to go back and view model data from back then. I don't even remember what models showed beforehand. I remember a winter storm watch then warning was issued for southern metro ATL counties the day before the event and then expanded to the rest of metro Atlanta the morning of the event.

If this event overperforms and causes similar issues in Atlanta, it'd be one of the biggest model fails in recent memory.

I believe the reason why that storm busted was because the NW side of the precip shield was underestimated. The short range models caught on better (the reason I can say that is there is a long stream related to this storm where the guy in there is talking about how the short range models were a warning shot).

I don’t remember what the models showed, but I do remember that Rome (which is where I was at for college for a little while, yes, it’s been that long and I’m still trying to work on being able to figure out how to make something of myself and get a job, it’s sad and I’m feeling it a bit more lately, what I’m working on now is medical coding) was supposed to just see a dusting of snow.

Ended up with a few inches of powder. Fun storm.

Don’t know if it’ll be as bad of a bust as that, but certainly feels as if Atlanta could see some flakes.
 
Last edited:
These snow shower might pack a punch when they move by .. anything more at this point is just guaranteeing more road issues tonight and tomorrow morning
 
00z MMFS is in!
Snowfall Accumulation
ZR Accumulation
Experimental Winter Storm Impact Index

Showing an expansion of the NW precip. Snow accumulations have slightly increased as well. Still showing a high impact event for many in NC/SC.


View attachment 109032

View attachment 109033

View attachment 109034
Wow this model did a 180 quickly .. I wonder what piece of information really made everything finally see this solution there had to be bad data at some point given to all the models
 
View attachment 109036Latest HRRR from noon tomorrow thru the end of its run. A beauty!
I feel like it keeps getting a tad faster .. entering wake around 5-6 .. wonder if we can get this thing here at 12 pm .. the more hours in these temperatures of that type of snow .. magic can happen .. we want every hour we can get
 
Wow this model did a 180 quickly .. I wonder what piece of information really made everything finally see this solution there had to be bad data at some point given to all the models
Not sure what it is, but just about every model has made the adjustment. Models in general have really struggled with this storm & have had higher than usual run-to-run inconsistency.
 
Not sure what it is, but just about every model has made the adjustment. Models in general have really struggled with this storm & have had higher than usual run-to-run inconsistency.
You would think we would have lots of data coming from that piece of energy at H5 we have been looking at clearly trending amped
 
Back
Top