lexxnchloe
Member
Maybe i dont read maps right but to be honest 18z looks to have a better low position than the other previous.
Maybe i dont read maps right but to be honest 18z looks to have a better low position than the other previous.
Keep in mind that it’s not the temperature at the surface that determines the ratio, but the temperature in DGZ that’s important… along with other factors such as wind. Surface temperatures has nothing to do with it…. In the January 2003 storm that gave CLT metro 40:1 ratios, temperatures were in the 33-35 degree range when it started and fell back into the 20s from there, but even as the snow was starting it was very noticeably the fluffiest snow I had ever seenThis is a boggling concept to me.. temps should be similar to if not a bit higher than last event during snowfall probably 29-31 I would say in the “thick” of whatever comes.. so how can snow ratios be higher in this event than last?? I assume it’s dynamics above our heads and the potential for the column to crash so rapidly is causing an intense snow liquid ratio .. I just don’t understand the process that well
Maybe i dont read maps right but to be honest 18z looks to have a better low position than the other previous.
Congrats OBX
View attachment 110721
Maybe this is the end of the bad trends and it will trend better from here. Even so, coastal areas that rarely get snow still look good on this map.Congrats OBX
View attachment 110721
The precipitation from Central NC west is associated with the Upper Level Trough that's swinging through, not the Low off the coast.I see that the NAM 12K and NAM 3K continues to be way too far NW with the precipitation,even with the later phasing. No chance this solution comes to pass.
View attachment 110720View attachment 110722
More in play besides the Lp off the coast. This is mostly ULL driven.I see that the NAM 12K and NAM 3K continues to be way too far NW with the precipitation,even with the later phasing. No chance this solution comes to pass.
View attachment 110720View attachment 110722
Agreed… even what it’s showing snow wise looks to be more associated with the Lee side trough than with the actual surface low itself. Also GSP is beginning to talk more of that possibility. One thing of note with that is that type of development will cause temperatures to crash at the surface very quickly… in the February 2013 event my temperature dropped from 42 to 32 in just a matter of a few minutes as the snow started fallingNAM is definitely trending towards the globals, you can even see that with the snowfall footprint. it’ll probably look similar by tonight or tomorrow morning to the euro and GFS at the sfc. I’m honestly a bit excited with the ULT band potential
IMHO they are way to far NW with the 540 ...I see that the NAM 12K and NAM 3K continues to be way too far NW with the precipitation,even with the later phasing. No chance this solution comes to pass.
View attachment 110720View attachment 110722
I know. I was talking about the precipitation closer to the coastline, which is not ULL driven. The NAM still has it too far west. The precipitation associated with the ULL is believable. The Precipitation that's closer to the coast is not, especially with the later phase.More in play besides the Lp off the coast. This is mostly ULL driven.
This is pretty much what the Euro is showing and what the GFS is starting to pick up on… you can’t just look at the surface map. The snow that this is showing from basically west of I-95 isn’t from the surface, but the Lee side trough/ULL that’s swinging throughI see that the NAM 12K and NAM 3K continues to be way too far NW with the precipitation,even with the later phasing. No chance this solution comes to pass.
View attachment 110720View attachment 110722
You should be less 100% when talking about weather in NC and weather in general .. there’s lots of moving parts to this system and a couple of them have the ability to deliver a good snow to different areas of NC. None of the models have the correct solution right now .. they are just tools we should look at all of them that way .. what are they trying to show us .. we decipher that and try and make a prediction. To cancel out completely the possibility that a storms precipitation is much more NW then currently forecasted 2-3 days out when all of our past storms have followed that same trend wouldn’t be the smartest thing imo on the other hand it’s clear there is a trend further out to sea in general and that must be taken into accountI see that the NAM 12K and NAM 3K continues to be way too far NW with the precipitation,even with the later phasing. No chance this solution comes to pass.
View attachment 110720View attachment 110722