• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry 01/28-29/2022 Winter Weather Potential

This is a boggling concept to me.. temps should be similar to if not a bit higher than last event during snowfall probably 29-31 I would say in the “thick” of whatever comes.. so how can snow ratios be higher in this event than last?? I assume it’s dynamics above our heads and the potential for the column to crash so rapidly is causing an intense snow liquid ratio .. I just don’t understand the process that well
Keep in mind that it’s not the temperature at the surface that determines the ratio, but the temperature in DGZ that’s important… along with other factors such as wind. Surface temperatures has nothing to do with it…. In the January 2003 storm that gave CLT metro 40:1 ratios, temperatures were in the 33-35 degree range when it started and fell back into the 20s from there, but even as the snow was starting it was very noticeably the fluffiest snow I had ever seen
 
I see that the NAM 12K and NAM 3K continues to be way too far NW with the precipitation,even with the later phasing. No chance this solution comes to pass.

ref1km_ptype.conus.pngref1km_ptype.conus (2).png
 
NAM is definitely trending towards the globals, you can even see that with the snowfall footprint. it’ll probably look similar by tonight or tomorrow morning to the euro and GFS at the sfc. I’m honestly a bit excited with the ULT band potential
Agreed… even what it’s showing snow wise looks to be more associated with the Lee side trough than with the actual surface low itself. Also GSP is beginning to talk more of that possibility. One thing of note with that is that type of development will cause temperatures to crash at the surface very quickly… in the February 2013 event my temperature dropped from 42 to 32 in just a matter of a few minutes as the snow started falling
 
More in play besides the Lp off the coast. This is mostly ULL driven.
I know. I was talking about the precipitation closer to the coastline, which is not ULL driven. The NAM still has it too far west. The precipitation associated with the ULL is believable. The Precipitation that's closer to the coast is not, especially with the later phase.
 
I see that the NAM 12K and NAM 3K continues to be way too far NW with the precipitation,even with the later phasing. No chance this solution comes to pass.

View attachment 110720View attachment 110722
This is pretty much what the Euro is showing and what the GFS is starting to pick up on… you can’t just look at the surface map. The snow that this is showing from basically west of I-95 isn’t from the surface, but the Lee side trough/ULL that’s swinging through
 
I know that every system and setup is different, but there is some similarity with regards to the SW energy from last week with the modeling. The models were digging the energy too much and in the last 24 hours started speeding up the energy and bringing more of it out. I do wonder if we will see anything similar with this system.
 
Seems to me that the thing to hope for at this point is a quick 1-3”/2-4” event for much of NC from the ULL. Most every model has this at this point. There will be winners and losers with this setup and snowfall amounts will not be even across the region. It’s not what we want, but it’s better than nothing. ?‍♂️
 
I see that the NAM 12K and NAM 3K continues to be way too far NW with the precipitation,even with the later phasing. No chance this solution comes to pass.

View attachment 110720View attachment 110722
You should be less 100% when talking about weather in NC and weather in general .. there’s lots of moving parts to this system and a couple of them have the ability to deliver a good snow to different areas of NC. None of the models have the correct solution right now .. they are just tools we should look at all of them that way .. what are they trying to show us .. we decipher that and try and make a prediction. To cancel out completely the possibility that a storms precipitation is much more NW then currently forecasted 2-3 days out when all of our past storms have followed that same trend wouldn’t be the smartest thing imo on the other hand it’s clear there is a trend further out to sea in general and that must be taken into account
 
Last two paragraphs of RAH's long range discussion (could be fun):

~
The arrival of the strong forcing/lift associated with the
amplifying northern stream trough diving into the region Friday
evening, coincident with a surface cold front that will push
southeast through the area, will lead to the development of precip
back across the western NC that will push east overnight. The
resultant deep column cooling will result in a fairly
efficient/quick change-over from rain to snow, with any transition p-
type of freezing rain/sleet being very short-lived and
inconsequential. Snow amounts of 1 to 2 inches are possible along
and north of HWY 64, with 1 inch or less expected across the
southern half of the forecast areas. Since the Winter Storm Warning
for snow is 3", will not issue any watches with this forecast
package.

However, it is also important to note, deep f-gen forcing and the
presence of CSI suggest favorable conditions for mesoscale snow
bands to develop and spread east across central NC Friday night.
Furthermore, intense dynamic cooling aloft will result in a sharp
increase in snow/liquid ratios(SLR) on the order of 15-17:1)
during that same time frame. These ingredients could result in the
potential for some very localized/very focused higher snowfall
amounts, quite possibly even warning criteria (>=3"). While it`s
very difficult to know exactly where these bands will set up, the
greatest potential is across the northern Piedmont and northern
coastal plain counties.
 
Back
Top