• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry 01/28-29/2022 Winter Weather Potential

Latest rap looks solid, around 2 inches for Charlotte, some areas around Charlotte by the time this event is over might have 7-10” on the yearView attachment 111081
I’m at 3.9 for the year which is my average… time to start making up for the last few years though…. Lol
 
NASA Model. Why not, one of these models has to be right ?‍♂️

WBIYAGb.gif


ek99Kt6.gif
 
Big reminder; that Nasa model measures in millimeters, not inches, for it's precipitation amounts. You would need about 25 millimeters for 1 inch of liquid precipitation.
That’s gimmick infringement with the Canadian.

I really do wish someone would start tracking these newer models and see which ones are worth their salt.
 
18z UK likes the super band over near GSO

How sick would that be to get under a 4-6” band.

View attachment 111094
Would be nice to see this go in the direction of a broad precip shield with enhanced pockets instead of a single band sweeping thru. Keep ticking the wave/trough stronger and getting it to close off would help
 
Would be nice to see this go in the direction of a broad precip shield with enhanced pockets instead of a single band sweeping thru. Keep ticking the wave/trough stronger and getting it to close off would help

Amen. That's what I've been hoping to see. But the enhanced floating "finger" is the only thing we look to get with this storm from most models. Hopefully NASA's got the right idea, that actually did look alot better to me, it closed it off as it swept through.
 
I still win with that look, it involves more
People as well with the east adjustment. Everything is good
Agreed.. that’s still a good looking band showing up and wherever it pivots will likely get the most amounts… also we really need to start paying close attention to the HRRR to see where any convective areas and thundersnow tries to set up with those localized intense rates
 
The lee side trough that develops disrupts our moisture transport off the Atlantic, we actually get a bit of warm air advection in the Coastal Plain as opposed to cold air advection which we want to see with a coastal. We needed the upper level trough to capture the low and start to bomb it before HAT, right now it looks like a close miss with capture to the north and east of us.
 
Man, futurecast has us using up a lot of qpf on rain.

While typically in setups we worry about rain being a issue, this convective band that comes out the mountains carries it’s own low level cool pool aided by T/D spreads and convective processes, it’s gonna crash as soon as heavy precip falls, similar to 2013, temps aloft tomorrow are gonna be anomalously cold, gonna be very easy to crash sfc temps
 
I still win with that look, it involves more
People as well with the east adjustment. Everything is good
If we all wake up with a white ground and 1-2 inches I’ll take that to the bank any day for our 3rd winter event of the season .. stack on the stats as much as we can
 
While typically in setups we worry about rain being a issue, this convective band that comes out the mountains carries it’s own low level cool pool aided by T/D spreads and convective processes, it’s gonna crash as soon as heavy precip falls, similar to 2013, temps aloft tomorrow are gonna be anomalously cold, gonna be very easy to crash sfc temps
Yes… I remember in 2013 dropping from 43 to 32 in a matter of just a few minutes.
 
Euro is still ticking stronger with the wave (528 contour dropping in on trend loop), while the total precip is trending weaker and bumping NE

Gn3FitI.gif


ZV9u2C7.gif
Interesting how we’re rooting for a weaker wave to benifit the band… hopefully this trend relaxes
 
Wouldn't we expect the opposite then?
I would, but who knows. Splitting hairs at this point I suppose....but the stronger the trough and vort max, and the stronger the wind max diving into the trough, the more dynamic it should be.

But you can see here how the 700mb RH holds for a few frames there just east of the Apps before moving east - common trait in this setup

edj2oQ1.gif
 
Man, futurecast has us using up a lot of qpf on rain.

That futurecast has the precip starting in CLT at 4pm.....later start would be better, but like others have said, the soundings look a lot like Feb '13 and the temps crashed quickly with that one; quicker than expected I'd say
 
No one knows what model is correct until AFTER the event occurs. Sure it could be correct OR totally off. We will know soon enough

Thank you! No doubt, no one knows what's about to happen, the models sure don't. 50/50 we verify at advisory level but a meaningful event as well a zero look equally likely. There will be a few lollipops somewhere in North Carolina east of elevation, that pretty much locked IMO.
 
Last edited:
I would, but who knows. Splitting hairs at this point I suppose....but the stronger the trough and vort max, and the stronger the wind max diving into the trough, the more dynamic it should be.

But you can see here how the 700mb RH holds for a few frames there just east of the Apps before moving east - common trait in this setup

edj2oQ1.gif
This loop is an excellent example of the near miss, between 36 and 48hrs. Called it several days ago, I did not like the evolution around the NW Great Lakes, it disrupted with a couple other things, we wanted that energy Mach 2 wheels down through North Dakota with a little quicker/better eject from the SW.

Artic front is draped, sitting at 29.3/20.7. What could have been, damn.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top