I’m at 3.9 for the year which is my average… time to start making up for the last few years though…. LolLatest rap looks solid, around 2 inches for Charlotte, some areas around Charlotte by the time this event is over might have 7-10” on the yearView attachment 111081
Man, that color scheme they have makes it look better than it is, haha.NASA Model. Why not, one of these models has to be right ?
![]()
![]()
NASA Model. Why not, one of these models has to be right ?
![]()
![]()
Millimeters?? Looks like it must be picking up on fog or a good heavy frost then,Big reminder; that Nasa model measures in millimeters, not inches, for it's precipitation amounts. You would need about 25 millimeters for 1 inch of liquid precipitation.
That’s gimmick infringement with the Canadian.Big reminder; that Nasa model measures in millimeters, not inches, for it's precipitation amounts. You would need about 25 millimeters for 1 inch of liquid precipitation.
Whichever has most snow is best. It's that simple.That’s gimmick infringement with the Canadian.
I really do wish someone would start tracking these newer models and see which ones are worth their salt.
The ECMWF model's last run showed a hint of it too.Seems like the GFS has been a few hours faster with what band over Charlotte relative to other models.
Would be nice to see this go in the direction of a broad precip shield with enhanced pockets instead of a single band sweeping thru. Keep ticking the wave/trough stronger and getting it to close off would help18z UK likes the super band over near GSO
How sick would that be to get under a 4-6” band.
View attachment 111094
Would be nice to see this go in the direction of a broad precip shield with enhanced pockets instead of a single band sweeping thru. Keep ticking the wave/trough stronger and getting it to close off would help
The trends have been there for that today. Props to the RGEM and 3k NAM18z euro looks worse for CLT and better east View attachment 111109
I still win with that look, it involves moreThe trends have been there for that today. Props to the RGEM and 3k NAM
I agree. I still do well As well. I would love for everyone to see 1-3 inches. It would make everyone happy. I don’t want to see anyone get shut outI still win with that look, it involves more
People as well with the east adjustment. Everything is good
Agreed.. that’s still a good looking band showing up and wherever it pivots will likely get the most amounts… also we really need to start paying close attention to the HRRR to see where any convective areas and thundersnow tries to set up with those localized intense ratesI still win with that look, it involves more
People as well with the east adjustment. Everything is good
Man, futurecast has us using up a lot of qpf on rain.
No one knows what model is correct until AFTER the event occurs. Sure it could be correct OR totally off. We will know soon enoughThe trends have been there for that today. Props to the RGEM and 3k NAM
If we all wake up with a white ground and 1-2 inches I’ll take that to the bank any day for our 3rd winter event of the season .. stack on the stats as much as we canI still win with that look, it involves more
People as well with the east adjustment. Everything is good
Yes… I remember in 2013 dropping from 43 to 32 in a matter of just a few minutes.While typically in setups we worry about rain being a issue, this convective band that comes out the mountains carries it’s own low level cool pool aided by T/D spreads and convective processes, it’s gonna crash as soon as heavy precip falls, similar to 2013, temps aloft tomorrow are gonna be anomalously cold, gonna be very easy to crash sfc temps
Interesting how we’re rooting for a weaker wave to benifit the band… hopefully this trend relaxesEuro is still ticking stronger with the wave (528 contour dropping in on trend loop), while the total precip is trending weaker and bumping NE
![]()
![]()
No one knows what model is correct until AFTER the event occurs. Sure it could be correct OR totally off. We will know soon enough
Euro is still ticking stronger with the wave (528 contour dropping in on trend loop), while the total precip is trending weaker and bumping NE
![]()
![]()
I would, but who knows. Splitting hairs at this point I suppose....but the stronger the trough and vort max, and the stronger the wind max diving into the trough, the more dynamic it should be.Wouldn't we expect the opposite then?
Man, futurecast has us using up a lot of qpf on rain.
No one knows what model is correct until AFTER the event occurs. Sure it could be correct OR totally off. We will know soon enough
This loop is an excellent example of the near miss, between 36 and 48hrs. Called it several days ago, I did not like the evolution around the NW Great Lakes, it disrupted with a couple other things, we wanted that energy Mach 2 wheels down through North Dakota with a little quicker/better eject from the SW.I would, but who knows. Splitting hairs at this point I suppose....but the stronger the trough and vort max, and the stronger the wind max diving into the trough, the more dynamic it should be.
But you can see here how the 700mb RH holds for a few frames there just east of the Apps before moving east - common trait in this setup
![]()