• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern Januworry

SD said:
16 days away, I'm tired of chasing cold, where is the ripeness, it isn't great if it doesn't snow, there was not enough modeled cold and/or snow on the run, where is the tpv, what was the r2r trend, not supported by the ensembles, it isn't as cold as 12z, the AO is positive, the L over Hudson Bay is going to screw it up, no -nao, is this good?
Click to expand...
“ I actually would like models more if they showed a snow storm that means conditions are favorable to create one” smh people this morning it was all hands on deck we’re DONE.. and now as a lot have been trying to say on here DONT FREAK OUT this is a fookin good pattern CHILL we will get the weenie maps eventually
 
NickyBGuarantee said:
“ I actually would like models more if they showed a snow storm that means conditions are favorable to create one” smh people this morning it was all hands on deck we’re DONE.. and now as a lot have been trying to say on here DONT FREAK OUT this is a fookin good pattern CHILL we will get the weenie maps eventually
Click to expand...
I don't understand the needing weenie maps at D7+ for validation of a great pattern. Very few times have we seen a storm from D7-10 work out and even from D5-7
gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_29 (2).png

This was the gfs from 12/30 for today, sorry TN your mega snowstorm isn't real bc the gfs didn't have it at D7
 
SD said:
I don't understand the needing weenie maps at D7+ for validation of a great pattern. Very few times have we seen a storm from D7-10 work out and even from D5-7
View attachment 102344

This was the gfs from 12/30 for today, sorry TN your mega snowstorm isn't real bc the gfs didn't have it at D7
Click to expand...
But the dec 2018 storm remember
 
SD said:
I don't understand the needing weenie maps at D7+ for validation of a great pattern. Very few times have we seen a storm from D7-10 work out and even from D5-7
View attachment 102344

This was the gfs from 12/30 for today, sorry TN your mega snowstorm isn't real bc the gfs didn't have it at D7
Click to expand...
Long-term ensemble/model support is very important. Regardless of a specific threat, it tells us if we are interpreting the pattern correctly. So far I've been dissatisfied with the snowy runs, so I'm not excited.
 
Ollie Williams said:
Long-term ensemble/model support is very important. Regardless of a specific threat, it tells us if we are interpreting the pattern correctly. So far I've been dissatisfied with the snowy runs, so I'm not excited.
Click to expand...
Yep, even last winter during the feb fail for us anyways, there was constantly runs showing a winter storm somewhere, from the beginning of the look till the very end, with lots of ensemble support with a good snow mean/ice, even if it did fail for us further east, it showed us the glimpse of potential it had and there was still winter storms for areas west of us, hopefully ensembles can look better then next few days wrt the snow mean
 
Myfrotho704_ said:
Yep, even last winter during the feb fail for us anyways, there was constantly runs showing a winter storm somewhere, from the beginning of the look till the very end, with lots of ensemble support, even if it did fail for us further east, it showed us the glimpse of potential it had and there was still winter storms/a few
Click to expand...
Yeah we had mega cold and winter storms and in the end not ----....sooo.... since they aren't impressive we are supposed to say awww shucks pattern sucks?
 
SD said:
Yeah we had mega cold and winter storms and in the end not ----....sooo.... since they aren't impressive we are supposed to say awww shucks pattern sucks?
Click to expand...
Not necessarily, the pattern doesn’t look bad at all, I’m not saying disregard H5 because of a bad snow mean, but it probably shows that there’s some issues with it, and that it could be better, like it could be a pattern that favors more cold shots vs snow, or just doesn’t have the right pieces for snow, like I said even with the fail, if it wasn’t for the bad trend around the Aleutians, we probably would have scored
 
GaWx said:
From new Euro Weeklies:

Who knows? Maybe this will be the period for big cold and a major SE winter storm? See precip map, which suggests Gulf low (Miller A?) is quite possible. Also, keep in mind that the MJO MAY be in the favorable low amplitude left side then. Keeping in mind that they likely have a warm bias at 2M:

View attachment 102292

View attachment 102295

View attachment 102297

View attachment 102298
Click to expand...

Following up with the weeklies suggestion of cold and also a possible threat in the 16-20 day period, the 12Z CFS also has cold followed by Gulf action.

Here is the H5 pattern in the 11-15 bringing in the cold with a nice +PNA:
5541928C-C5D3-40A8-BF11-5A30A9B71D6E.png


Once the cold has arrived, the 500 mb flow becomes moist WSW as the +PNA retrogrades:
5A7CF579-1106-4989-BEA4-2A387C3904BA.png


But the 16-20 remains cold over most of the SE just like the Euro weeklies show:
8F4BB397-09F5-48C3-A8B5-775DEA266AF6.png


Check out the Gulf moisture:
54675FB6-F7B7-4C17-A4FD-21B3CC982F2F.png
 
GaWx said:
Following up with the weeklies suggestion of cold and also a possible threat in the 16-20 day period, the 12Z CFS also has cold followed by Gulf action.

Here is the H5 pattern in the 11-15 bringing in the cold with a nice +PNA:
View attachment 102346


Once the cold has arrived, the 500 mb flow becomes moist WSW as the +PNA retrogrades:
View attachment 102347


But the 16-20 remains cold over most of the SE just like the Euro weeklies show:
View attachment 102348


Check out the Gulf moisture:
View attachment 102349
Click to expand...
Based on the temp departures there’s likely a lot of CAD here as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top