• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Coronavirus (Stay on Topic)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't say I blame you something about the J&J doesn't work for me

The new real world study published about Pfizer and moderna only drive home further that these are the winners. Any vaccine is better than no vaccine...that is true, but Moderna and Pfizer should be very available and those seeking out J&J may eventually do themselves a disservice.


80% effective against symptomatic AND asymptomatic infection after first dose BEATS J&J pretty solidly.

I’m thinking J&J vaccinated individuals will require a booster before Moderna and Pfizer individuals, which will be recommended as post-vaccine trials continue and antibody titers are measured in these subjects. This bit is speculation on my part, but I can see it happening. I vaccinated my girlfriend and my twin brother with Moderna. I’m a strong believer in the mRNA technology and the efficacy of these vaccines standing up to variants vs J&J.

Also, as a COVID survivor, it’s not just about the hospitalization and death endpoint. We do not know yet what the long term complications of the covid virus crossing the blood brain barrier and infecting the brain is. Journals are publishing data on debilitating symptoms of long haulers (see the suicide of the Texas Roadhouse CEO due to debilitating tinnitus).

When experts say “100% effective against hospitalization and death,” they’re selling the vaccine to get folks vaccinated but this is missing the importance of developing symptoms and avoiding infection altogether. To me, that’s just as important, because you or your loved one could become a “long hauler” — even after vaccinated. I’m not recommending J&J to my loved ones if Moderna and Pfizer are options.
 
The new real world study published about Pfizer and moderna only drive home further that these are the winners. Any vaccine is better than no vaccine...that is true, but Moderna and Pfizer should be very available and those seeking out J&J may eventually do themselves a disservice.


80% effective against symptomatic AND asymptomatic infection after first dose BEATS J&J pretty solidly.

I’m thinking J&J vaccinated individuals will require a booster before Moderna and Pfizer individuals, which will be recommended as post-vaccine trials continue and antibody titers are measured in these subjects. This bit is speculation on my part, but I can see it happening. I vaccinated my girlfriend and my twin brother with Moderna. I’m a strong believer in the mRNA technology and the efficacy of these vaccines standing up to variants vs J&J.

Also, as a COVID survivor, it’s not just about the hospitalization and death endpoint. We do not know yet what the long term complications of the covid virus crossing the blood brain barrier and infecting the brain is. Journals are publishing data on debilitating symptoms of long haulers (see the suicide of the Texas Roadhouse CEO due to debilitating tinnitus).

When experts say “100% effective against hospitalization and death,” they’re selling the vaccine to get folks vaccinated but this is missing the importance of developing symptoms and avoiding infection altogether. To me, that’s just as important, because you or your loved one could become a “long hauler” — even after vaccinated. I’m not recommending J&J to my loved ones if Moderna and Pfizer are options.

Thank you, for this information. I’m on the fence... 51% I’ll get the vaccine. I was wondering, like others which one to take. Initially, thought J&J because of the convenience of a one shot. Again, I appreciate the information coming from a health care provider. - Eric
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jon
I do think “doctor“ Fauci is a COMPLETE FRAUD. The man thrives on air time. Constantly contradicts himself. Just my opinion. Oh, I think this may be the third or so times I’ve visited this thread. Please don’t hate. LOL
 

Very interesting read


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The new real world study published about Pfizer and moderna only drive home further that these are the winners. Any vaccine is better than no vaccine...that is true, but Moderna and Pfizer should be very available and those seeking out J&J may eventually do themselves a disservice.


80% effective against symptomatic AND asymptomatic infection after first dose BEATS J&J pretty solidly.

I’m thinking J&J vaccinated individuals will require a booster before Moderna and Pfizer individuals, which will be recommended as post-vaccine trials continue and antibody titers are measured in these subjects. This bit is speculation on my part, but I can see it happening. I vaccinated my girlfriend and my twin brother with Moderna. I’m a strong believer in the mRNA technology and the efficacy of these vaccines standing up to variants vs J&J.

Also, as a COVID survivor, it’s not just about the hospitalization and death endpoint. We do not know yet what the long term complications of the covid virus crossing the blood brain barrier and infecting the brain is. Journals are publishing data on debilitating symptoms of long haulers (see the suicide of the Texas Roadhouse CEO due to debilitating tinnitus).

When experts say “100% effective against hospitalization and death,” they’re selling the vaccine to get folks vaccinated but this is missing the importance of developing symptoms and avoiding infection altogether. To me, that’s just as important, because you or your loved one could become a “long hauler” — even after vaccinated. I’m not recommending J&J to my loved ones if Moderna and Pfizer are options.

Its funny you bring this point up, because every piece of literature out there says to not compare the 3 head to head, or even the 2 mRNA's to the Jansen... For someone who touts following the CDC's guidance, you're telling people on here to NOT follow their guidance in getting the J&J...

I'd just like to point out, that J&J vaccine is 74% effective against Asymptomatic infection. That's not solid beating of the 80% mRNA...

UCSF

We also have more information about asymptomatic infections from the J&J trials because they included asymptomatic PCR testing and antibody testing. (Participants were tested for antibodies to a part of SARS-CoV-2 that was not the spike protein since the vaccine would induce antibodies to the spike protein.) The vaccine was found to be 74 percent effective against asymptomatic infection, similar to its protection against symptomatic infections.

CNN

When the volunteers were checked at 71 days after they had gotten the vaccine, it seemed about 74% effective against asymptomatic infections.
 
Its funny you bring this point up, because every piece of literature out there says to not compare the 3 head to head, or even the 2 mRNA's to the Jansen... For someone who touts following the CDC's guidance, you're telling people on here to NOT follow their guidance in getting the J&J...

I'd just like to point out, that J&J vaccine is 74% effective against Asymptomatic infection. That's not solid beating of the 80% mRNA...

UCSF



CNN

It’s funny? It’s my personal opinion. Real world studies included variants. 80% does trump 74%. Also, that literally doesn’t matter, because most get their 2 shot series and complete it, so 90% > 74% is it not? That significant.

Also, FYI, you guys are NOT my patients. This is my personal opinion on vaccine preference. Just like someone who chooses to not take a vaccine. It’s your choice.

Also, I said any vaccine is better than no vaccine, I didn’t say not to get it if you want J&J. Did I?

J&J just is now getting distributed. People have a choice here. Why not pick a vaccine with superior clinical data? Any recommendations to get J&J is based on the “any vaccine is better than no vaccine” which I addressed in my post that it’s true. There’s clearly superior vaccines for covid 19 of you don’t understand that you aren’t reading the trials.

I’m not simply talking about hospitalization and death, I’m talking about preventing covid 19 infection, period. That was the basis of my post. The long term effects of covid 19 infection and what vaccines I believe offers the most protection.
 
Last edited:
It’s funny? It’s my personal opinion. Real world studies included variants. 80% does trump 74%. Also, FYI, you guys are NOT my patients. This is my personal opinion on vaccine preference. Just like someone who chooses to not take a vaccine. It’s your choice.

Also, I said any vaccine is better than no vaccine, I didn’t say not to get it if you want J&J. Did I?

J&J just is now getting distributed. People have a choice here. Why not pick a vaccine with superior clinical data? Any recommendations to get J&J is based on the “any vaccine is better than no vaccine” which I addressed in my post that it’s true. There’s clearly superior vaccines for covid 19 of you don’t understand that you aren’t reading the trials.
ezgif.com-gif-maker (1).gif

J&J just is now getting distributed. People have a choice here.

Also, you don't get a choice. You sign up for an appointment, and you get what they have on hand that day. Last I checked on my county's website, Cone Health's, or Novant's Vaccine website there isn't a drop to select your preferred shot... You select an appointment (if you can catch an opening) and you show up. It's like school lunch, you eat what they are serving.

80% effective against symptomatic AND asymptomatic infection after first dose BEATS J&J pretty solidly.

80% does trump 74%.

80>74... but were talking 6% 6 people out of 100...
1617113405603.png




Any vaccine is better than no vaccine...that is true, but Moderna and Pfizer should be very available and those seeking out J&J may eventually do themselves a disservice.

c'mon man.gif

The but followed by a negative completely invalidates what the positive 1st part of the sentence says. We're all old enough to know that when you use but... it completely invalidates the first part... I love you, but... I like your idea, but... You're cute, but... Any vaccine is better than no vaccine, but... You're doing yourself a disservice...
 
View attachment 80906



Also, you don't get a choice. You sign up for an appointment, and you get what they have on hand that day. Last I checked on my county's website, Cone Health's, or Novant's Vaccine website there isn't a drop to select your preferred shot... You select an appointment (if you can catch an opening) and you show up. It's like school lunch, you eat what they are serving.



80>74... but were talking 6% 6 people out of 100...
View attachment 80907






View attachment 80908

The but followed by a negative completely invalidates what the positive 1st part of the sentence says. We're all old enough to know that when you use but... it completely invalidates the first part... I love you, but... I like your idea, but... You're cute, but... Any vaccine is better than no vaccine, but... You're doing yourself a disservice...

Ok. I’ll repeat, 80% > 74% after the first vaccine and people go on to get a second. So 90%+ > 74%. This isn’t even worth debating.

It’s pretty clear. Crystal.

I think Moderna and Pfizer are better vaccines, and they are, if you like reading the data and clinical trials.

I fully support CDC guidelines and to say I don’t it’s putting words in my mouth. Of course if you don’t have a choice get what you can get, we need everyone vaccinated. There’s no such thing as a bad vaccine.
 
Ok. I’ll repeat, 80% > 74% after the first vaccine and people go on to get a second. So 90%+ > 74%. This isn’t even worth debating.

It’s pretty clear. Crystal.

I think Moderna and Pfizer are better vaccines, and they are, if you like reading the data and clinical trials.

I fully support CDC guidelines and to say I don’t it’s putting words in my mouth. Of course if you don’t have a choice get what you can get, we need everyone vaccinated. There’s no such thing as a bad vaccine.

That's pretty much what your entire first post was. Your bad take on what is or isn't a bad vaccine.

Still looking for my choice... Can you help me? Which drop down do we use to select our preferences?

1617114587854.png

1617114559433.png
 
So bit of a line to park today at the vaccine center. It's good thing that the lines to vaccinate are longer than the lines at the testing center. I timed it at only 5 minutes from the time I checked in at the desk to the shot. Sitting for 15 minutes then I'm on my way home.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210330-130451_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20210330-130451_Gallery.jpg
    900.3 KB · Views: 20
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top