Doubt that. It’s still the very long range NAM so whether it’s showing beefy totals or nothing at all it shouldn’t be taken serious until we get inside 36-48 hours. It had a 1035 HP sitting further south closer to the US border so I think we are sitting pretty as of right now.The NAM looks like it’s coming in pretty beefy for western/central NC and the northern Upstate but it is warmer than the GFS suit and CMC suit this might be because the NAM’s hp is 2-3 mb weaker than those models. However it looked like it did increase QPF this run.
View attachment 57465
What trend? Outside of the euro there isn’t a trend.Ballgame for upstate...trend has been less precip and warm. Only extreme north get anything other than cold ass rain!
Dewpoint. Another poster hit the nail on the head. These warm dews we experience anymore will do a number on what would have been a classic CAD even 5 years ago.Doubt that. It’s still the very long range NAM so whether it’s showing beefy totals or nothing at all it shouldn’t be taken serious until we get inside 36-48 hours. It had a 1035 HP sitting further south closer to the US border so I think we are sitting pretty as of right now.
Most of the models have me at 33 and rain for a good portion of the event. But even if that was to drop a degree of two, that still wouldn't give me (or others in similar setup) a big event. As you said, we need the lower dew point to web bulb down into the upper 20s. Ice cycles are pretty but it means your losing a lot to run off.
Really cool study from Sanders & Barjenbruch (2016) wrt ice liquid ratios that's worth reading imo.
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/31/4/waf-d-15-0118_1.xml?tab_body=fulltext-display
For ice radial accumulations, which are the standard for measuring freezing rain accumulation, they found that for every inch of radial ice accrual about 3-4" of liquid equivalent is measured (via ASOS).
View attachment 57443
Thus, when you see maps like this, especially when there's a ton of QPF, it's usually a good idea to take ~25-33% of these 1:1 QPF-ice accumulations.
View attachment 57444
Pivotalweather also now has an option for those w/ a subscription where you can select for the Freezing Rain Accumulation Model (FRAM) accumulations described in the aforementioned study & these are considerably more reliable than 1:1 QPF-ice accum model output. The FRAM model uses regression on modeled precipitation rate, wet bulb temperature, and wind speed to estimate ice accrual. It's certainly better than using straight 1:1 QPF-ice output, but I would still urge caution in using a product like this.
View attachment 57445
Yes, it's more like 1" Radial ZR:3-4" QPF according to this study. Stronger winds actually enhance ice accrual efficiency because it increases the rate of evaporative cooling, the rate of sensible heat transfer from cooler surrounding air to slightly warmer adjacent air near a freezing object that's undergoing latent heating & stronger winds increase a horizontal cross section's mass flux (of ice), all serving to increase ice accumulation efficiency at higher wind speeds. The effect is pretty small until wind speeds begin to approach exceed 10-15 knots.
"It is inferred that the increasing wind speed replaces air near the ice surface warmed by latent heat release, alters the droplet collision efficiency, increases the horizontal mass flux, and promotes evaporational cooling. Although, the data show that these processes are not as noticeable in the ILRs until wind speed reaches >15 kt, and may rely on the thermodynamic environment as well. Wind gusts had a similar influence on ILR with an increasing trend in ILR as wind gusts increased."
View attachment 57455
As for surface temperatures, your intuition is correct in that there's a strong temperature dependency, with wet bulb temperatures above -1C (~30F) experiencing significantly lower ice liquid ratios (ILRs) than those with temperatures between -4 to -1C. The relationship reverses and lower ILRs are observed for temps lower than about -4C (~25F), as the low-mid levels usually become more supportive of sleet instead of freezing rain, in environments where the surface temperatures are this cold or colder.
View attachment 57460
They also found rather unsurprisingly, that ice accumulation efficiency is dependent on precipitation rate with the largest changes in ILRs between rain equivalent rates of a few hundredths to a tenth or so per hour, with it asymptoting towards ILRs of about 1:7.5 or so in heavy precipitation.
View attachment 57461
cloudy miserable day. Some cold rain, any ZR or sleet probably last under 2 hours at onset. Patchy mix.What does the bird man think about Zebulon?
2m Temps, dew points have both trended warmer in my area of the upstate on the NamWhat trend? Outside of the euro there isn’t a trend.
It does which makes it’s temp profiles in the long range warmer. That’s something that switched on the nam from years past. That’s why the rule of thumb is to really not put much stock into the nam until you get inside 36-48 hrs.Doesn't the NAM have the same issue as the Euro of being overamped, especially in the long range?
For us upstaters, I think it's still too early to say yet, but there's no question it's very marginal for us. The high is much farther north than you want to see it; we need to see down around NY/PA, which would more likely be a snow situation. Given what are currently seeing I-40 north and I-77 west is a good bet for at least something frozen. For the upstate, especially western upstate, it looks like a novelty event at best; for now.Let me guess...the models are trending warmer and upstate Sc is looking like a cold rain now?
Webber said yesterday the high placement being in Quebec compared to NY has little to no affect in the CAD. Especially when you’re talking a 1035-1038 HP. If you live in eastern Pickens, Greenville, Spartanburg, Cherokee, western York, and northern union county you have a good chance of seeing a decent icing event IMO. Seeing the 3KM being much colder than the 12km at Hr 60 is a telling sign to me as well.For us upstaters, I think it's still too early to say yet, but there's no question it's very marginal for us. The high is much farther north than you want to see it; we need to see down around NY/PA, which would more likely be a snow situation. Given what are currently seeing I-40 north and I-77 west is a good bet for at least something frozen. For the upstate, especially western upstate, it looks like a novelty event at best; for now.
The snow part is pure wishcasting but it's happened before. All depends on 850s how close they get before warm nose takes over here at my house I'm only a degree away from all snow at onset.I'm thinking along and NW of 85 up to 1in of snow if front end thump can get in here quick enough before waa takes over and changes to sleet/fzr up to .25 of ice max quick system not that much precipitation. The closer you are to the escarpment the better chance you have to see sleet and fzr and accumulation close to .25. Hopefully 925s can cool enough to give us sleet here along the escarpment fingers crossed.
Wow there is a lot more going on further south this run. Has it been like this the past few runs?I like the GEFS here, basically 85 and north, than later in the event it switched back to rain, highly agree with this (Some members are to aggressive imo) View attachment 57471View attachment 57470View attachment 57472
While it’s unlikely, and probably to aggressive by some members, can never count it out, but yeah it has been back and fourth with runs showing stuff further north then southWow there is a lot more going on further south this run. Has it been like this the past few runs?
I count 13/20 showing pretty significant ZR in the Upstate there. That’s getting closer to a consensus than outliers. However you’re right those members, despite being in the majority, are not really in agreement with the other modelsWhile it’s unlikely, and probably to aggressive by some members, can never count it out, but yeah it has been back and fourth with runs showing stuff further north then south
Went back the other way a bitWhat about the 12z Icon, It was coming in colder last few runs has the trend continued or gone the other way? Haven't seen it mentioned. Maybe it hasn't run yet? IDK I'm still of the notion EURO has to be more on board for me to take it serious meaning (something more than token pellets and tops of trees with a glaze.
Your not lying it has been very consistent the last 3 runs, although it’s trended towards more ZR instead of IP for more NW areasThe Canadian is basically unchanged from the last several runs, I-85 corridor in SC & southwestern NC will generally be the dividing line between cold rain/nuisance glaze to the SE vs significant impacts NW.
View attachment 57476
Your not lying it has been very consistent the last 3 runs, although it’s trended towards more ZR instead of IP for more NW areas View attachment 57477View attachment 57478
Do you think the models maybe just aren’t translating it on the precip maps so it’s making people think the upstate be out of it? Living in the best CAD position in SC I have seen this many times. Models trying to underestimate CAD, models trying to erode it way too fast, and models being anywhere from 2-5 degrees too warm, and models trying to drive the LP into the CAD. We’re seeing this now. If you have a 1037 HP even in Quebec that’s got a solid 12-24 hour head start on the LP, I just don’t see anyway you don’t get significant ice in the Piedmont, foothills, and the upstate. Especially those from Anderson to Laurens to Union north.Last 3 days of 12z GEFS runs valid for 0z Wed.
Despite some noise that we've lost some QPF, been ticking warmer/less ice, or that much of upstate SC is out of the ballgame for this event, it's pretty obvious in my eyes where we've been trending the past few days:
All of these aforementioned statements are simply false w/ these synoptic scale changes at 500mb across successive days on the GEFS. This more amplified, slower wave pattern in the east-central US continues to push the distribution of realistic solutions here towards a colder, stronger, more laterally extensive CAD and more ice overall, w/ risk of ice increasing in the I-85 corridor in upstate SC. A few more large-scale tweaks like this and far NE Georgia will also stand a chance to see at least a light glaze before all is said & done.
View attachment 57481