• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern January 2020 - Operation Thaw Alaska

I was mentioning it in a general sense. Im not gonna write a novel when 99% of the people here could have read and understood what I said. Im not denying anything. If you really want to think Im moving the goal post, go ahead.

Im not exactly sure we are on that much a different page as far as severe weather goes. Sure, this is a pattern for some severe weather, I don't deny that. That said, having posted with Tennessee Storm for years and seeing Myfro's previous posts and being a severe weather junkie myself, seeing messy storm modes hindered by weak lapse rates is not a "severe weather" pattern for us.

Edit: Now that I think about it, I'm not writing a novel in any case.
I love a good severe weather discussion... interesting thoughts here.
 
I was mentioning it in a general sense. Im not gonna write a novel when 99% of the people here could have read and understood what I said. Im not denying anything. If you really want to think Im moving the goal post, go ahead.

Im not exactly sure we are on that much a different page as far as severe weather goes. Sure, this is a pattern for some severe weather, I don't deny that. That said, having posted with Tennessee Storm for years and seeing Myfro's previous posts and being a severe weather junkie myself, seeing messy storm modes hindered by weak lapse rates is not a "severe weather" pattern for us.

Edit: Now that I think about it, I'm not writing a novel in any case.

What you basically said was the subtropical jet stream advects the EML

"the subtropical jet can also flood mid-level moist air which really hurts the EML"

This is obviously not true at all because the subtropical jet is exclusively in the upper troposphere and in geostrophic balance, thus the subtropical jet is not advecting anything. Then you later said you were actually referring to waves in the subtropical jet and not the subtropical jet itself. (facepalm).

It's honestly not my fault that you clearly messed up and get butthurt every time I point out this obviously flaw in your line of rationale instead of admitting you were wrong & moving on.

This last bold statement is key because it gets right to the heart of my previous responses to you, the EML is not a necessary prerequisite for severe weather or even a large outbreak in the SE US, as you were previously hinting at, other limiting factors such as CAPE are more critical at this time of the year.
 
we are all weather enthusiasts... if we wasn't... we wouldn't be on the forum have great discussions which I really enjoy... but this lack of interesting weather is starting to get under our skins.... lol
 
It's more of "That's enough of this in this thread", but if you want to defend yourself do so in a non-month discussion thread and keep it non-personal. We had enough of that last year.

I'm not defending myself, but my backside. How dare someone say it is hurt when it actually doesnt, but ok I'll make sure I'll whine about it in the whiney thread next time.
 
I'm not defending myself, but my backside. How dare someone say it is hurt when it actually doesnt, but ok I'll make sure I'll whine about it in the whiney thread next time.
There's a reason why I deleted two posts at once. I'm not saying you defending yourself was wrong. The way webber was posting was wrong as well saying you were butthurt. There's a line between civil discussion and name calling that I saw was crossed and both of you crossed it.
 
There's a reason why I deleted two posts at once. I'm not saying you defending yourself was wrong. The way webber was posting was wrong as well saying you were butthurt. There's a line between civil discussion and name calling that I saw was crossed and both of you crossed it.

Hey man, it's ok and I understand. The last post to you was in jest. Even the post to Web about me being butthurt and needing therapy was in jest as well. People can believe what they want, but I'm not getting butthurt over anything on the internet anymore, even if Metwannbe changed my avatar to his face.

Ok that may cross the line....
 
EPS is definitely picking up on something ~January 7-10th.

KGSO_2019122900_snow_24h_360.png


Easy to see why there are a decent number of members showing a storm when you have a pattern like this being modeled at day 9 coupled w/ an active subtropical jet. Remains to be seen how large of a window we're gonna have to work w/ here, and it's possible we may quickly devolve into a -PNA by Jan 10th if our ACWB in the NE Pacific is suppressed &/or weaker.

ecmwf-ens_z500a_namer_10.png


Fwiw, also worth mentioning the GFS is also hinting at a storm in roughly the same timeframe.

Point is, the pattern appears to be significantly more favorable than normal around January 6-10th ish for wintry weather in the SE US & climatologically speaking, this is also the coldest part of the winter for most on the board. We just need to trend in the right direction w/ individual waves over the coming week to allow for an actual threat to materialize.

gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_33.png
 
EPS is definitely picking up on something ~January 7-10th.

View attachment 29196


Easy to see why there are a decent number of members showing a storm when you have a pattern like this being modeled at day 9 coupled w/ an active subtropical jet. Remains to be seen how large of a window we're gonna have to work w/ here, and it's possible we may quickly devolve into a -PNA by Jan 10th if our ACWB in the NE Pacific is suppressed &/or weaker.

View attachment 29197


Fwiw, also worth mentioning the GFS is also hinting at a storm in roughly the same timeframe.

Point is, the pattern appears to be significantly more favorable than normal around January 6-10th ish for wintry weather in the SE US & climatologically speaking, this is also the coldest part of the winter for most on the board. We just need to trend in the right direction w/ individual waves over the coming week to allow for an actual threat to materialize.

View attachment 29198

Hey Webb, do you think this is the only threat for January since the MJO is looking to head towards 4,5,6? This looks like a small window before we go unfavorably for a few weeks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hey man, it's ok and I understand. The last post to you was in jest. Even the post to Web about me being butthurt and needing therapy was in jest as well. People can believe what they want, but I'm not getting butthurt over anything on the internet anymore, even if Metwannbe changed my avatar to his face.

Ok that may cross the line....
?
ebdb1a13ebdab9953640b680d485a5d5.gif


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
I actually like the look of the D7+ right now (ie last day or 2 of model runs). I think that could leave us potentially cold enough, but also have energy drop down the Rockies and scoot SE to allow something to happen. Looks like there could be that fine line with the STJ and the SER where we could have a parade of storms potentially.
 
Hey Webb, do you think this is the only threat for January since the MJO is looking to head towards 4,5,6? This looks like a small window before we go unfavorably for a few weeks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Subseasonal tropical forcing is being predominated by faster moving Convectively Coupled Kelvin Waves, persistence of a particular forcing regime will be limited going forward which also means we're going to get a ton of different looks in the coming weeks and probably will be less likely to contend w/ more classical, slower moving MJO. Even if one were to materialize, the +ENSO lean globally favors faster MJO propagation due to stronger advection by the background flow.

Another CCKW is forecast to reach the West-central Pacific roughly in/around late January.

chi200.cfs.eqtr.png
 
I thought I could bare it, but in the end that may set me over the edge.

Sorry just being honest.
I was just confused how I got drug into this with the changing of an avatar to my face, that's what I was wondering??

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
I was just confused how I got drug into this with the changing of an avatar to my face, that's what I was wondering??

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Well it's a long warped story that included posting while trying not to burn the eggs. Not a recipe of good posting and I promise I'll do better.
 
All -EPOs aren't created equal, you get a west coast trough/-PNA when the -EPO is suppressed equatorward & displaced westward. Need the ridge to be centered closer to the Yukon Territories and literally over Alaska to benefit from it.

Yep.

This is also true for most teleconnections.

Looking at a EPO or NAO graph can only tell you so much, even if it says it’s going negative. You have to look at the 500mb look and see the location of the ++anomalies and find out why the model is classifying it as a -NAO or -EPO. Sometimes it can be classified as a -NAO and not matter for our weather. Same for -AO, not all are created equal. Hell even +PNA, we can get a super strong ++PNA but if it’s not technically in the right place we don’t benefit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
EPS and GEFS with widespread negative 850mb anomalies 10-11 days after Dec 27 when we were in MJO Phase 7. Lines up perfectly with the RMM Phase 7 lagged 850mb temp composites (lag 2,3) and Baxter et al. research. The research actually notes Central AND eastern cold 850s which is exactly what we’re to experience.

dfe37a862e1d32a53ab43aff40be26d7.jpg

2f40029fe3e8009aea883a2d5c5566f1.jpg

18760183247850d82c38e1e38fd241e1.jpg

115212450bc99bd647cc14a1eee2dc7a.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
EPS and GEFS with widespread negative 850mb anomalies 10-11 days after Dec 27 when we were in MJO Phase 7. Lines up perfectly with the RMM Phase 7 lagged 850mb temp composites (lag 2,3) and Baxter et al. research. The research actually notes Central AND eastern cold 850s which is exactly what we’re to experience.

dfe37a862e1d32a53ab43aff40be26d7.jpg

2f40029fe3e8009aea883a2d5c5566f1.jpg

18760183247850d82c38e1e38fd241e1.jpg

115212450bc99bd647cc14a1eee2dc7a.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Certainly looks like we are headed toward a day or 2 where we struggle through the 30s around here. May pull out a mid teens low too

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jon
Speaking of useless -EPO’s. And we spent all of Feb in 8-1-2. Makes we cringe that we may spend the next 2 months in a similar pattern.

A3579CAB-784E-4CE9-B2EC-5CB19E00744D.png
 
Speaking of useless -EPO’s. And we spent all of Feb in 8-1-2. Makes we cringe that we may spend the next 2 months in a similar pattern.

View attachment 29202

A -EPO & a -NAO during a NINO February is usually game, set, match for cold around here however the placement of that ridge was suppressed & we were left w/ a very warm pattern.

We technically didn't get shutout but still very meh.

February 19-20 2019 NC Snowmap.png
 
A significant piece of the TPV starts to drop down towards the Baffin Bay by day 8-9 on the GFS. The evolution of the TPV is still the biggest wildcard the next few weeks and its predictability is severely limited. Just a week or so ago, it appeared that the TPV would park over Alaska, instead it’s going to end up going over Greenland
 
A significant piece of the TPV starts to drop down towards the Baffin Bay by day 8-9 on the GFS. The evolution of the TPV is still the biggest wildcard the next few weeks and its predictability is severely limited. Just a week or so ago, it appeared that the TPV would park over Alaska, instead it’s going to end up going over Greenland
Pretty impressive to see how the gfs is struggling in the extended. I mean even for the gfs these are some wild run to run changes
d67a3df2d6e684fdda36c55cfc9f3cee.gif


Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 
I had felt and said that the SE as a whole would be lucky to average N as opposed to AN normal for 1/1-15 thanks to transitory cold shots. The bias corrected model consensus is telling me to stick with this idea with the best chance for AN in the deep SE thanks to more influence from SER in the means. Keep in mind that model consensus has had a lot of trouble for quite awhile with not having the SER strong enough in the medium range. And with -AAM, that risk is very much in play imo.

Consistent with this, I would be surprised if my area and nearby isn’t AN for 1/1-15 even if the deep SE is able to get several days of BN within.
 
Last edited:
Pretty impressive to see how the gfs is struggling in the extended. I mean even for the gfs these are some wild run to run changes
d67a3df2d6e684fdda36c55cfc9f3cee.gif


Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
The one constant between all those runs is a huge ridge over the N Pacific and Alaska, details on this ridge truly matter and mean all the difference between an early start to spring or a monster arctic outbreak with widespread 10s & 20s in the SE US. I personally don’t see much room for anything in between.
 
Pretty impressive to see how the gfs is struggling in the extended. I mean even for the gfs these are some wild run to run changes
d67a3df2d6e684fdda36c55cfc9f3cee.gif


Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
I’d love to see that -AO verify. I wonder if we could get a -EPO and -AO to link up if it would encourage the +PNA we need? It seems the one and only thing the GFS can hold onto from run to run is a ridge in the east and a trough in the west. Smh
 
Related to my last post, below is the 1-15 day period per the 12Z GEFS without correction for cold bias. Of course, this includes a very warm first 2 days but the end looks mild, too. So, I don’t think moving this forward 2 days would cool it much. And again, this is not bias corrected. The best shot at solid cold is within 1/6-9 and it does look to get pretty cold for the bulk of that period. So, the good news is that the bulk of the SE shouldn’t be totally shut out of a nice cold period within 1/1-15, thus likely saving us from a torch in the means for 1/1-15:

3A6E77AE-3D19-484A-81F2-437A8748E716.png
 
Last edited:
The one constant between all those runs is a huge ridge over the N Pacific and Alaska, details on this ridge truly matter and mean all the difference between an early start to spring or a monster arctic outbreak with widespread 10s & 20s in the SE US. I personally don’t see much room for anything in between.
Yeah it's really going to be feast or famine here with that much amplification of the Pacific.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 
Am i the only one surprised more isn't showing up here with a jet streak like this on hour 150 on the GFS?

gfs_uv250_us_26.png
Its close but the trough is still too positive to get anything going. Put a little more energy into the base of the trough, slow it down, tilt it neutral and you get something
119d7bd8d7dd4f10bc5b5a59ded67471.jpg


Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 
Its close but the trough is still too positive to get anything going. Put a little more energy into the base of the trough, slow it down, tilt it neutral and you get something
119d7bd8d7dd4f10bc5b5a59ded67471.jpg


Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
You can actually see the energy diving in from the plains then moving off the east coast make an attempt. The kicker moving in along the west coast keeps things moving and the energy is just strong out enough so the trough stays meh
 

Attachments

  • gfs_z500_vort_us_fh132-162.gif
    gfs_z500_vort_us_fh132-162.gif
    1.6 MB · Views: 32
Back
Top