My technique that I came up with can get very complicated, but I have the ability to use the technique, because I discovered it myself and I understand how my technique works. I say my technique has about a 60% - 80% accuracy rating. Most of the time, I do not use the Euro as the base model, why would I do that if the Euro has a good accuracy score? I mainly use the GFS as the base model and work off of it. However, I may use a different model as my base model, it could be the Euro or the CMC, or a combination of both and or other models.
It depends on which one I use as the base model, if it has a realistic possible outcome first before any other model, I use that model as the base model. So yeah, I use a blend of all models, regardless which models have a reduced accuracy score. So, my technique can vary depending on what data is being shown on the models. Using a blend of models is just part of my technique.
My predictions is based off of my opinion, experience, skills and the unique technique I use. It may sound like I'm misinforming because I'm putting out my own predictions that no model is showing. But, a weather forecaster does not have to base his/her predictions based off of what is being shown at face value on these models. My advise is to any weather forecaster, input your knowledge/skills and use a technique that works for you alongside model data.