NoSnowATL
Member

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Really most politicians are dirty and lie a lot. It's the choice of political bias to point out those lies constantly and use them as dirt even if the lies mean nothing. Look back and Bill Clinton and his situation as a perfect example of how the dems even have their corruption and lying. Not everyone is corrupt but still you can't say just Trump is lying and not look at what the other past presidents have said and not point them out as well.Why do you bring up Hillary? Only talking about the orange one. Actually he is benefiting from many things Obama started and no, my wallet is no fuller and the environment is going to suffer due to him and his cronies.
Sounds like a trump promo.![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd just be careful with the executive orders. While the Constitution gives the President executive powers and the use of executive orders to a degree, it's not the end all be all and certainly can lead to dangerous implications down the road. I'm not saying he shouldn't use some executive orders but every time he does so it gives the left ammunition to use them when/if they are in office, especially those who have said they will utilize exec orders to ban certain firearms. Plus executive orders are basically only good while the current Pres is in office, the next one will no doubt use those executive powers to overturn them.I sincerely hope this impeachment lights a fire under Trump and the right-wing movement in general. At this point the left-wing powers that be and a lot of their supporters are incensed and it is time for the right to be as well.
In all honestly Trump should go all out and start issuing executive orders on the issues he talked about again like he did back in January 2017.
I'd just be careful with the executive orders. While the Constitution gives the President executive powers and the use of executive orders to a degree, it's not the end all be all and certainly can lead to dangerous implications down the road. I'm not saying he shouldn't use some executive orders but every time he does so it gives the left ammunition to use them when/if they are in office, especially those who have said they will utilize exec orders to ban certain firearms. Plus executive orders are basically only good while the current Pres is in office, the next one will no doubt use those executive powers to overturn them.
What we truly need are congressional members with some backbone, that will represent the people as they have been elected to do and actually listen to the people instead of following their own selfish desires. IF we had that then congress would act and no president could just march in and change laws on a whim. Of course we have a better chance of a board wide blizzard with 4 foot snow drifts
Sounds like a trump promo.
The vast majority of politicians are liars and hypocrites, you'll get no argument from me on that but as Kasey Dillon stated on twitter last week "I'll vote for Trump, I wouldn't be his friend but I'll vote for him." The lesser of 2 evils scenario is very real and when it comes to that I'll go with the one whose policies most closely align with my beliefs. I understand why it's a deterrent to political discussion and more troubling a deterrent to getting involved but these liars and hypocrites write the laws by which we must live, set our taxes and unfortunately have a profound effect on our lives whether we take part in the discussion, get involved or not. It's why I don't shy away from it and I will discuss it even in all it's ugly stages to take a stand for what I believe and cast a vote every time the polls are open. It's just too important not to.I agree because Trump issuing more executive orders would make him a hypocrite as he criticized Obama for doing the same thing, issuing too many executive orders. Sort of like his criticism of Obama playing too much golf. There’s no question Trump is a hypocrite about the golf. Does anyone disagree?
And so this is why I despise most political discussions. Hypocrites on both sides typically. Too much tribalism.
It absolutely does take a jackass to deal with these moronic Dems....I admit Trump can be a jackass, but maybe it takes a jackass to win against false information campaigns .
Still waiting on your answer?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sounds like a trump promo.
This is the world we live in today. Tell me how is this right, how is this good for anyone, can no one do anything anymore without it becoming political, without the PC mob attacking like the vultures they are...... do we really think this is the right path to be traveling down??
Also if I were a betting man, I'd wager a month's salary that 80% or more will not take the time to actually read the memo and an even higher percentage of those that are screaming impeachment won't read it in it's entirety. They will take a couple of statements out of context and run with itWhy on earth would world leaders around want to have candid conversations with the POTUS, knowing full well there is the potential that, not only someone is listening, but that the details of said conversation will be leaked for all to here?! These are stupid scary times we live in.
Wars have started for lesser reasons, releasing a transcript of a phone call is dangerous
A little show called House of Cards taught me a lot about American politics. Sure, it's just a television show, but it really made me aware of all the grandstanding politicians do and have done for a loooong time now. I loathe Trump with every fiber of my being but the left makes it hard for me to even go vote in 2020. Everything and everyone is a joke and I don't want to play this game.All these clowns are shady and really don't understand the situation of regular Americans. How could they? The tenticles of corruption extend far deeper than any of us likely know. Even if you classify Trump as an outsider with his fist raised against the system, he's still just one person, who will likely see just one term. I don't know...but I don't see red vs blue anymore. It's all a show. I mean, sure, there are some social issue differences, but these hot potatoes just get tossed round and round and used as a wedge to keep us focused on each other, as they take power, wealth, and freedom away, bit by bit by bit.
Listening to Polosi’s news conference, with all her certain absolutes they should impeach today.
I’m really trying to understand their logic impeaching right before the election. The only real logic I can understand is they know they will probably lose so might as well start to muddy the second term.
All these clowns are shady and really don't understand the situation of regular Americans. How could they? The tenticles of corruption extend far deeper than any of us likely know. Even if you classify Trump as an outsider with his fist raised against the system, he's still just one person, who will likely see just one term. I don't know...but I don't see red vs blue anymore. It's all a show. I mean, sure, there are some social issue differences, but these hot potatoes just get tossed round and round and used as a wedge to keep us focused on each other, as they take power, wealth, and freedom away, bit by bit by bit.
This could use its own thread but have you guys seen Greta Thunberg’s speech today?
here is a snippet. “People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction...”
you can watch it here.
here is a promoted tweet I’ve seen for a couple days. What a joke. Somehow we went from a couple degrees of warming to “we are all dead in 12 years”
View attachment 23946
excuse me but last time I checked we are no where near a “mass extinction.” I mean how can a teenager get by spewing this propaganda to our world leaders? It is simply astounding at the fear mongering that is associated with climate change.
It is a shame because politics has ruined science. Science is not even close to the original design it was used for. Now it’s an agenda filling hole.
We are openly selling lies of “mass extinction” and other absolutely absurd suggestions to get an agenda across. And people somehow cheer nonsense like this on because they fear going against the grain and being called a racist or denier or whatever the term of the day is.
Show me one ecosystem in “full” collapse. Show me the MASS extinction. Or even just a normal extinction. I’ll wait.
I’m all for taking care of our planet but forcing radical change in this way? That’s not how it works.
What Liberal Media Did Not Tell You: Screaming Green Teen Greta Thunberg Linked to Antifa Terrorists – Recorded Song for Antifa-Supporting Org
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...rter-recorded-song-for-antifa-supporting-org/
That's from a pretty far right source, and sounds conspiracy-level, so I don't buy it. I advise getting multiple less-extreme sources to fact check this.What Liberal Media Did Not Tell You: Screaming Green Teen Greta Thunberg Linked to Antifa Terrorists – Recorded Song for Antifa-Supporting Org
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...rter-recorded-song-for-antifa-supporting-org/
Amicable divorce of a nation needs to occur before the socialist is electedI actually could see this as collusion between Trump and the Dems to nuke Biden. Clearly the socialists have been introduced on the main stage now and while it’s not palatable yet to most, by 2024 it will be out there and no longer a fringe idea. Then with a fresh face behind it and less people scared of it, you have a much better chance at getting the votes.
It wouldn’t surprise me if Trump gets the election, goes completely lame duck which allows a socialist to be elected in 2024.
Really I'd worry about the looming crash of the market. It's inevitable in the next 5 years due to economic signals as well as historic timing, so the next presidential term holder will have to manage that. Put trump back in and it won't go so well I feel since a dip in the market will only get worse unless he does something unexpected from a right winged perspective. However if you put an extreme leftist in, the market will probably plunge and take the economy with it due to a massive economic shift until a massive amount of spending levels it out. If we get someone who isn't so extreme maybe it won't be so bad, but that's very unlikely. I don't like the way the country is heading politically at all right now. Unfortunately the next economic downturn is probably going to be a big push for socialist programs because misguided young voters will turn to whatever helps them survive.I actually could see this as collusion between Trump and the Dems to nuke Biden. Clearly the socialists have been introduced on the main stage now and while it’s not palatable yet to most, by 2024 it will be out there and no longer a fringe idea. Then with a fresh face behind it and less people scared of it, you have a much better chance at getting the votes.
It wouldn’t surprise me if Trump gets the election, goes completely lame duck which allows a socialist to be elected in 2024.
That's from a pretty far right source, and sounds conspiracy-level, so I don't buy it. I advise getting multiple less-extreme sources to fact check this.
While the image is true, she stated she does not align herself with Antifa at all. She doesn't support fascists, but she's against their violent ways of spreading their message. Here's her tweet responding to it. The tag is a bit more questionable and she likely doesn't know what she's talking about tagging it. I don't support her, but I also don't support heavily biased news in either direction. It creates more problems than it solves.This site pretty right. No denying that. Read the article and the provided links. Below is her tweet wearing an Antifa Shirt. (She has since deleted) Oh, she tags #EXTINCTIONREBELLION which a dangerous group wanting MASS human deaths to save the planet.
View attachment 24018
While the image is true, she stated she does not align herself with Antifa at all. She doesn't support fascists, but she's against their violent ways of spreading their message. Here's her tweet responding to it. The tag is a bit more questionable and she likely doesn't know what she's talking about tagging it. I don't support her, but I also don't support heavily biased news in either direction. It creates more problems than it solves.
Yeah sounds like she was "coached" on how to walk back a tweet.So....... After backlash all she has to do is delete Tweet and issue an explanation the next day. Now she's free and clear?
I'm not buying it. She made the decision to wear the "borrowed" T-shirt.
BTW Forsyth, this is nothing personal just a discussion.![]()