packfan98
Moderator
The first week looks to have some potential. I feel like this specific threat should go into the December thread instead of the Winter or November threads. Let's see where it goes.

The first week looks to have some potential. I feel like this specific threat should go into the December thread instead of the Winter or November threads. Let's see where it goes.
![]()
E13. Haha thanks for making my day.I think E13 might of skewed the mean there and hopefully fun times are ahead.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk![]()
So Greg Fishel released his winter forecast yesterday. It was a letdown, though it should not have been. Essentially focused only on the strength of the upcoming El Nino to make his forecast. Acknowledged that he thought the NOAA forecast was ok and if he was forced to take a stance, given the absence of any real compelling signal either way, he would go slightly cooler in the east and go for a range of 5-8" of snowfall for RDU. I think 7"ish is our average. This kind of a presentation is essentially worthless and a waste of time to even prepare.
Nope, I knew he would toe the middle of the road. I hoped he would have at least talked about several of the variables that are liable to impact the pattern this winter. His sole area of focus was the strength of El Nino. Nothing about the type of El Nino, the propensity for blocking, antecedent autumnal conditions, the stratosphere, or solar implications, not to mention the vast scope of non-US seasonal models showing a virtual unanimous signal for a colder east. I understand not having the time to go into great detail on these things. I do. But the job of a forecaster is not to look at model output or other forecasts and simply repackage and restate and relay that. Instead, it is to research, assimilate data, and using your years of experience, produce a forecast that is worth something more than what I can pull up on Tropical Tidbits.Did you expect anything different? I think he is always going to go with the average no matter what. Then when we have a legit threat, he and the rest at WRAL will start low and change as the storm unfolds. They always play it super conservative, and it is annoying sometimes.
Maybe Webber should take over for WRAL when Fish retires.
Should we call it July??? Just kidding. I'll change it to something more fun.Hate the thread title. #boycotting
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
It would be very exiting for most of us to hit our averages before Christmas and play with house money the rest of the winter with loads of potential for Jan/Feb. Not too dissimilar to last winter for those who got the big storm in December.I'd seriously love to cash in on a big dog in early December because El Nino winter climatology would favor a lot more where that came from later in the winter (even against long-term climatology)
Nope, I knew he would toe the middle of the road. I hoped he would have at least talked about several of the variables that are liable to impact the pattern this winter. His sole area of focus was the strength of El Nino. Nothing about the type of El Nino, the propensity for blocking, antecedent autumnal conditions, the stratosphere, or solar implications, not to mention the vast scope of non-US seasonal models showing a virtual unanimous signal for a colder east. I understand not having the time to go into great detail on these things. I do. But the job of a forecaster is not to look at model output or other forecasts and simply repackage and restate and relay that. Instead, it is to research, assimilate data, and using your years of experience, produce a forecast that is worth something more than what I can pull up on Tropical Tidbits.
You're absolutely right. They do that in every winter weather situation no matter what other factors or forecasts may show. No doubt Webber is fit for the job, my worry would be WRAL would dull down the insight Webber provides and it would just be status quo. I would rather have him here unrestricted.Did you expect anything different? I think he is always going to go with the average no matter what. Then when we have a legit threat, he and the rest at WRAL will start low and change as the storm unfolds. They always play it super conservative, and it is annoying sometimes. Meanwhile, every other met, like DT, Huffman, and WxSouth, are calling for above average snow here.
Maybe Webber should take over for WRAL when Fish retires.
It seems like climatology favors snowfall in the Deep South earlier in the winter than central/eastern NC. This wasn't just last year - If I remember correctly the Deep South saw December snowfalls three years in a row from 2008-10 when 2008 and 2009 were duds here.Oh you NCs guys have done it now. I'm calling it, 11/28 big dog hits MS,AL and Ga and you guys get skunked all of December.
If we're going to focus on the day 8-10 period when there's a subtle hint of a threat potentially emerging if a few other puzzle pieces fall into place, December 2000 has a case to be made being one of the stronger early winter analogs that produced something in the Carolinas.
View attachment 7532
View attachment 7533
View attachment 7534
No. This is the one where he predicted and I quote: "Colossal amounts" of snow - if I remember correctly, I think he was calling for 12-16" of snow in Wake County and RDU received a Trace. Now in all fairness, this was an epic bust by NWP and NWS Raleigh has a great case study on it.Is that one that Fishel was calling for a monster snow and had to stand in the fountain?
Wow, that is awesome. Well, not for Raleigh but it's crazy how much the totals dropped and so quickly during each run. Weren't they calling for a storm in Charlotte at one point too?No. This is the one where he predicted and I quote: "Colossal amounts" of snow - if I remember correctly, I think he was calling for 12-16" of snow in Wake County and RDU received a Trace. Now in all fairness, this was an epic bust by NWP and NWS Raleigh has a great case study on it.
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~nwsfo/storage/cases/20001203/
View attachment 7535
Van Denton in Greensboro was calling for a foot of snow. I went out and bought a shovel! I jinxed it! We got partly cloudy.Wow, that is awesome. Well, not for Raleigh but it's crazy how much the totals dropped and so quickly during each run. Weren't they calling for a storm in Charlotte at one point too?
No. This is the one where he predicted and I quote: "Colossal amounts" of snow - if I remember correctly, I think he was calling for 12-16" of snow in Wake County and RDU received a Trace. Now in all fairness, this was an epic bust by NWP and NWS Raleigh has a great case study on it.
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~nwsfo/storage/cases/20001203/
View attachment 7535
I agree, both storms probably taught a lot of Mets in the Carolina's a thing or two about how easily things can turn on your forecast around these parts. I am sure the Carolina crusher prompted a lot of Mets to assume that the storm in early Dec, 2000 would behave the same as the Jan 2000 event and moisture would creep further West than what the last second shift Eastward was showing.I think this one and the bust the other way with the Carolina Crusher in Jan 2000 are the reasons he started very conservative and low with the amounts, no matter what the models and indicies show, and adjusts as the storm unfolds.
A local met in Baton Rouge, Josh Eachus, has his forecasts done the same way. He basically overviews the Nino Nina trends and forecasts from that. He doesn't bring up any other factors.Did you expect anything different? I think he is always going to go with the average no matter what. Then when we have a legit threat, he and the rest at WRAL will start low and change as the storm unfolds. They always play it super conservative, and it is annoying sometimes. Meanwhile, every other met, like DT, Huffman, and WxSouth, are calling for above average snow here.
Maybe Webber should take over for WRAL when Fish retires.
Agree this could be an opportunity *IF* the trend towards more separation between the initial northern stream wave -- which ushers in a potent cold front -- and a follow up northern stream wave and a southern stream wave continues. We need that first wave to separate and get out ahead of the second northern wave so that 1) we have the cold air in place out ahead of the system and 2) keep it suppressed by acting as a 50/50 low. There is also some potential for a phase/interaction between northern and southern streams if the stars truly align.