NOAA said ENSO-neutral conditions were present on the latest update from 1/20/20 and also said it's also favored through spring. That along with the update from the IRI yesterday says neutral. I've seen your tweets and it doesn't seem like a shared opinion by the powers at be. Not doubting you-- just wondering why there's such large discrepancies....you'd think it would be simple.
Past ENSO Events
https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/enso/past_events.html
According to NOAA, the ENSO is to remain neutral. This was updated not too long ago.
https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/produ...ng/lanina/enso_evolution-status-fcsts-web.pdf
Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk
NOAA uses arbitrarily defined thresholds for ENSO criteria and only uses ERSSTv5 for their analyses (my ENS ONI is a lot better). There's definitely a pretty clear NINO lean to this winter that's not normally present even in "official" events & I've stated my case on here many times and on twitter and I certainly don't feel like repeating myself again.
You don't get extreme tropical +AAM spikes like this when ENSO is "neutral" (which it's clearly not this year), in fact the tropical +AAM was so strong that it was westerly in the means for the first time ever in the satellite era.
Nor do you see incessant dateline westerly wind bursts for several months in a row when ENSO is "neutral", the base state has to be advanced enough towards El Nino to do this, which it is this year.
The current SST configuration also closely resembles the "modoki NINO" flavor of ENSO.
The upper level circulation anomaly configuration also resembles El Nino w/ a wavenumber 2 pattern in the global tropics, strong uplift over the Indian Ocean has become a staple of modern 21st century El Ninos, this year it's just stronger.
As for a previous post where it was claimed 1939-40, 1951-52 2008-09, & 1979-80 were "neutral" ENSO winters
1951-52 was a weak-moderate NINO winter, 2008-09 was a La Nina winter, 1939-40 was a late blooming moderate El Nino, 1979-80 by some metrics was also an El Nino.
This is taken from my webpage & research on the Oceanic Nino Index which uses twenty six SST reconstructions and reanalysis datasets. The values derived here are more robust & meaningful than NOAA's which uses only ERRSTv5 (w/ no quality control of the data):
https://www.webberweather.com/ensemble-oceanic-nino-index.html
It's in really close agreement w/ NOAA's index over the latter portions of the record, only differences emerging from the fact that I use a lot more datasets and filter out bad/potentially spurious data.