accu35
Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2017
- Messages
- 8,654
- Reaction score
- 10,791
Sorry Brick, SW Al.Clarke Co.Where are you? You can put the location in your profile.
Sorry Brick, SW Al.Clarke Co.Where are you? You can put the location in your profile.
Its a Win!! Lol.It's sleeting just to the north of my house.
I'll take it somehow or another it dumps 2" right in my backyard lolFor what it's worth, here's the snowfall accumulation from the 3km NAM for NC. Virtually nothing southeast of I-85
View attachment 1907
Easily, could come in more NW during the event I guess definition of "too far" is not trending to TN at this pointIt's 48 hours away, this can't trend too far NW can it?
It's 48 hours away, this can't trend too far NW can it?
Long story is yes the precip shield but we need a good cold push tomorrow
that's what I'm hoping for![]()
UKMET gives North Georgia a bunch of heavy rain friday.
Too far north?UKMET gives North Georgia a bunch of heavy rain friday.
it was very closeUKMET gives North Georgia a bunch of heavy rain friday.
It wasn't too close. 850mb 0C line was from Rome to Blairsvilleit was very close
The swiss model is not impressed at all... Nobody gets above an inch east of the mountains but at least there's some snow TV to go around
View attachment 1910
I remember that being brought up when no model really showed that much anyway. Can't fault him for that since most mets don't want to be burned on early guidance.David Chandley just tweeted out the NAM map showing 10” south of ATL metro. This is the same met who said zero chance of snow a few days ago. Somewhere in the middle of denial and hysteria would probably be better for the public...
Is that actual total snowfall or snowfall liquid equivalent? It looks more like liquid equivalent(if using 10:1 ratios, then that broad dark blue area would be 4-6 inches of accumulated snowfall).
Just looking at the 3k nam soundings the warm nose at 750 is thin them it's freezing or below to near the surface wouldn't be at all shocked to see a lot of sleet. I would like to see a deeper cold layer below the warm nose to really go all in though
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
The column is already saturated so there is no ability to move below freezing. We would be relying on cold air advection as the system passes to change to snow at the end. We could see areas flip to snow in heavier patches as precip rates wouldn't be as affected by the warm nose.Is there not an opportunity to wet bulb there? I know this might’ve been asked like 5000000000000 times but I’m sn quite recall because of that attention deficit problem I may or may not have.