ForsythSnow
Moderator
It's too weak that's why. I bet if it showed a stronger low it would be much better looking. It's also too far south to benefit anyone.00z nam looks horrible
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's too weak that's why. I bet if it showed a stronger low it would be much better looking. It's also too far south to benefit anyone.00z nam looks horrible
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's too weak that's why. I bet if it showed a stronger low it would be much better looking. It's also too far south to benefit anyone.
Nah, the ICON is weak and had all rain so far.While we cry over the NAM and wait for ICON to save us...18z swiss View attachment 4407
The 0z ICON was more suppressed and weaker w/ the coastal low. There was hardly any precip north of RDU in NC
View attachment 4408
Honestly, this looks about right for this storm in my opinion. I don't believe anyone SE of RDU will see anything more than a few flakes mixed in with the cold rain. Just not enough cold air for this system to work with. Frustrating to finally get a good track with a storm and not have the cold air needed for it. Seen this play out several times here. Hope I'm wrong but this is what I am expecting.While we cry over the NAM and wait for ICON to save us...18z swiss View attachment 4407
Omg!!!Awww look the mid-Atlantic almost got a big snowstorm but Grayson Allen was there to hip check it out to sea! Lol one of my friends made this..
View attachment 4410
Yes further south closed LP moves through South AL then LP opens up of east coast
View attachment 4411
Yes further south closed LP moves through South AL then LP opens up of east coast
View attachment 4411
Speaking of blockbuster storms, I believe the 25 year anniversary of the Blizzard of 93 is on Mon.If this storm was a month early, that's a blockbuster storm for Atlanta.
The 0z UKMET went ballistic and has a bomb off the Delmarva in 72 hours. The discrepancy between NWP models just 2.5-3 days out is nuts
Yep. Still can't pin down a solution unfortunately.Another nam run another look
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
At least it has a real storm now.Another nam run another look
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
At least it has a real storm now.
It's crazy how the NW trend just came out of nowhere after trending more suppressed a few days ago up until now. Wow hahaha
Not going to say any names, I just don’t think some mets and weenies understand the limitations in NWP predictability in situations like this with multiple s/w interactions and how minute changes at the synoptic scale can translate into very significant wholesale alterations at the surface just a few days out. Even something as simple as initializing only a modestly more intense s/w can have massive impacts because vorticity growth is non linear. This also means as a wave grows it becomes more efficient at modifying the bgd flow and drawing available potential energy from it which affects the evolution of other waves embedded in the flow (and can the impact of each individual wave on other disturbances be diagnosed with piecewise PV inversion)It's crazy how the NW trend just came out of nowhere after trending more suppressed a few days ago up until now. Wow hahaha
Very Ciceronian and quite a great post, Webb!Not going to say any names, I just don’t think some mets and weenies understand the limitations in NWP predictability in situations like this with multiple s/w interactions and how minute changes at the synoptic scale can translate into very significant wholesale alterations at the surface just a few days out. Even something as simple as initializing only a modestly more intense s/w can have massive impacts because vorticity growth is non linear. This also means as a wave grows it becomes more efficient at modifying the bgd flow and drawing available potential energy from it which affects the evolution of other waves embedded in the flow (and can the impact of each individual wave on other disturbances be diagnosed with piecewise PV inversion)