• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Winter 25-26 Winter Battle Zone

We have a slowdown of the MJO in Phase 5

View attachment 176042


But that was forecasted and may be good news depending on how you want to view Dec-Jan. I think the JMA has a good middle of the road forecast here of the MJO getting into lower amp Phase 7 by mid-Nov.

View attachment 176043


Similar on the Euro Wk as it shows a slow trek in Phase 7 thereafter into early Dec.

View attachment 176045


A good target in my mind would be a slow trek thru phases 7-8-1-2-3 from late Nov to early-mid Jan. We had that type of slow trek in Dec-Jan 2021-2022 (Nina with very similar -QBO structure as this winter / low amp MJO toward the end), albeit a little later then (early Dec to late Jan)

View attachment 176046

View attachment 176047

Expected turn, but painful to watch. Really hope it keeps going 8-2 and doesn't stay on the right, as that seems to me the biggest driver of our colder patterns of late. Convection in the pacific, the jet alignment makes all the difference. Any red flags that would make it stay in the maritime?

BAM Weather had a free webinar today. I couldn't listen to it, but here's their forecast.
View attachment 176048
View attachment 176049
View attachment 176050

I'd take that in a heartbeat if we could get it in reality. What's funny is that no matter the variable, every winter February is now the first month of spring.....always. That's the only month they're higher confidence on. lol.
 
Ain’t no way the SE in the forecast gets more snow then NYC.
Yeah so these are just saying that they expect more snow compared to normal in parts of the SE, with NYC below normal snowfall...not actual snowfall amounts.

Some people rail on BAM, but they are good forecasters from what I've seen over the past few years. Do they get a little excited? Yes, but hey, so do we in here. That's all part of it. No forecaster in the world gets it right all the time
 
After a tick rise in the Strat PV strength chart yesterday, there was a fall today, centered around Nov 25-26. Bottom line, we want it weaker than normal (dark red line is normal), especially in the lower strat around 100mb (not shown here as this is for the upper strat at 10mb, but in this type of setup, and with the models favoring some level of high latitude blocking going forward, the upper strat and lower strat should be somewhat similar in behavior)

Nov 5 Euro SPV.png
 
La Niña is living on borrowed time.

The only reason the extreme -IOD event we're currently seeing is going to collapse is because all of the warm water is about to get flushed into the tropical west pacific at depth over the next month or two in this MJO event's westerly wind burst. Another solid subsequent MJO burst over the West Pacific later in the winter would lead to rapid onset of El Nino conditions this spring.

A more rapid shift towards El Niño is probably the one wild card we could play that would have the potential to significantly alter the outcome of the latter part of this winter/February in our favor (though even then it wouldn't be a guarantee that things would shift favorably even in that scenario).

ps2png-worker-commands-754db7b784-sdjq4-6fe5cac1a363ec1525f54343b6cc9fd8-yem6wrq6.png
 
Expected turn, but painful to watch. Really hope it keeps going 8-2 and doesn't stay on the right, as that seems to me the biggest driver of our colder patterns of late. Convection in the pacific, the jet alignment makes all the difference. Any red flags that would make it stay in the maritime?
Things seem to be moving along nicely so far. Here is the Euro Wk MJO. 1st image is MJO forecast from Oct 16. 2nd image is MJO forecast from Nov 5. Green dots are ensemble members for Day 20 of the forecast. End of black line is 30 day forecast (I believe, as it says Monthly forecast and that seems to make sense) - so early Dec in Phase 7

Nov 5 MJO Loop.gif


Also, on the VP maps from today's weeklies, we can see the -VP signal in green (upper divergence / uplift / enhanced convection) in the E Maritime Continent (Phase 5) for Nov 5-12 avg....with that signal out of the MC and uplift over S America in the 2nd image for Dec 14-21 (Phase 8-1 type look). Sure, the Weeklies can leave us standing at the altar, but they seem to follow the general idea of MJO expectations from what I've seen and gathered.

Nov 5 VP Loop.gif
 
Things seem to be moving along nicely so far. Here is the Euro Wk MJO. 1st image is MJO forecast from Oct 16. 2nd image is MJO forecast from Nov 5. Green dots are ensemble members for Day 20 of the forecast. End of black line is 30 day forecast (I believe, as it says Monthly forecast and that seems to make sense) - so early Dec in Phase 7

View attachment 176056


Also, on the VP maps from today's weeklies, we can see the -VP signal in green (upper divergence / uplift / enhanced convection) in the E Maritime Continent (Phase 5) for Nov 5-12 avg....with that signal out of the MC and uplift over S America in the 2nd image for Dec 14-21 (Phase 8-1 type look). Sure, the Weeklies can leave us standing at the altar, but they seem to follow the general idea of MJO expectations from what I've seen and gathered.

View attachment 176057

The negative NAO in late November into December is pretty key & favorable to communicating this upper-level footprint of the MJO into the Western Hemisphere
 
La Niña is living on borrowed time.

The only reason the extreme -IOD event we're currently seeing is going to collapse is because all of the warm water is about to get flushed into the tropical west pacific at depth over the next month or two in this MJO event's westerly wind burst. Another solid subsequent MJO burst over the West Pacific later in the winter would lead to rapid onset of El Nino conditions this spring.

A more rapid shift towards El Niño is probably the one wild card we could play that would have the potential to significantly alter the outcome of the latter part of this winter/February in our favor (though even then it wouldn't be a guarantee that things would shift favorably even in that scenario).

View attachment 176055

 
The negative NAO in late November into December is pretty key & favorable to communicating this upper-level footprint of the MJO into the Western Hemisphere
Getting an MJO event to orbit into the Western Hemisphere (phase 8-1) a majority of the time relies on the extratropical circulation carrying the signal along, because the SSTs aren't warm enough outside of the Indo-Pacific to couple directly with the ocean, except perhaps in big El Niño events.

Having a negative NAO makes these western hemisphere MJO orbits more likely to occur because the extratropical waves penetrate deeper into the tropics during -NAO:

You can basically think of this as a positive feedback, where the presence of a -NAO makes a phase 8-1 MJO more likely to occur, which also favors -NAO, etc.
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/34/23/JCLI-D-21-0153.1.xml

I reviewed the paper you shared on this earlier and it appears to state the exact opposite. It clearly states that a negative NAO often lags an eventual MJO in P3 and a positive NAO lags an eventual NAO in P7.

full-JCLI-D-21-0153.1-f1.jpg
Observed 21–30-day lagged occurrence frequency of MJO phases following positive and negative NAO in extended winters of 1981–2017. The remaining panels show the probability of occurrence of MJO phases in the forecast period of 21–30 days initialized with positive and negative NAO for individual S2S models. The vertical bars represent the 95% level of confidence from a 10 000 bootstrap resampling calculation.

In this study, based on the reforecast data of 11 models of the WWRP/WCRP S2S project, the influence of the NAO prediction of the MJO is investigated. It is found that most models are able to reproduce the MJO phase change following the occurrence of positive and negative NAO events. About three weeks after a positive NAO, there is increased probability of MJO phase 7, while about three weeks following a negative NAO, MJO phase 3 is more likely to occur.

They theorized this relationship could be due to the following, but it doesn't sound like a definitive explanation:

One possible explanation is that following an NAO event, which has a dipole Z200 anomaly structure in the Greenland and midlatitude North Atlantic regions, there is a slow southward propagation of energy, so that with time the amplitude of the Greenland anomaly center is reduced and a subtropical center develops and enhances. After about 2–3 weeks, wave activity flux converges in the subtropical North Atlantic, causing a local zonal wind acceleration that acts as a forcing on the tropics. As a result, an equatorial Kelvin wave is excited to the east in the region with an easterly mean flow over the tropical Indian Ocean, leading to strong zonal wind anomalies, thereby influencing the MJO. However, questions related to the detail of this process, what controls the southward wave energy propagation, and how the extratropical forcing excites the tropical Kelvin remain unclear.

Not trying to be argumentative, but I am curious how you come to the seemingly definitive conclusion that a negative NAO makes a phase 8-1 MJO subsequently more likely to occur when the paper you cited appears to state the opposite?
 
Back
Top