Inspired by the study
@griteater shared with us a few days ago, I replicated their QBO/Solar analysis on subseasonal variability of the polar vortex, but used a lot more data, looked only at cool neutral and La Niña winters, and utilized NOAA 20th Century Reanalysis SLP to analyze surface variability in the polar vortex.
In order to increase the sample size of the data I had to play with, I also used this pre-1953 QBO reconstruction from
Bronnimann et al (2007) to analyze early 20th century QBO behavior.
Breaking down things by month revealed some very interesting behavior. I highlighted this year's current solar/QBO combo (High solar/East QBO) for reference (Warm colors = High SLP, Cold Colors = Low SLP). There's of course a lot of variability still within each sub-composite, but it was neat to see what this looked like anyway.
High Solar/East QBO/-ENSO winters like this one historically tend to have a weaker polar vortex & -NAO in December and January, and usually see a rather sudden & dramatic flip of the AO/NAO to positive (or even strongly positive) during February, with the positive AO/NAO lasting into at least March.
One thing you can honestly say about High Solar/East QBO winters like this year compared to other cool ENSO cases is that outside of January, they tend to follow the typical La Niña paradigm (far right column) more than most. (i.e. a front-loaded winter).
