snowlover91
Member
Last 4 runs of CMC at H5. Pretty obvious this is trending northward and the surface will eventually catch up. It'll take longer because it's the CMC.
Lights. Out.
View attachment 10403
That area stays zr the entire event. and its not just 32 and rain. its 28-30.
View attachment 10405
This is very concerning to me. I know that it is the GEM and a lot of folks like to rag on it and it's late to the party most of the time, but once it figures out what a winter storm is going to do it is usually spot on with the p-types. This model has been spot on with every winter storm for my area that I can remember including the previous storm in December. As a matter of fact, it and the RGEM were the ONLY models that got that one right for MBY. Both forecasted a minimal amount of sleet with a heavy dose of cold rain and that's exactly what I got, while the FV3 was giving me 6+ inches of snow.
Doesn't matter how it got there, it's there. At H5 it's identical to the 06z FV3, which is in lockstep with the 00z Euro. Zero chance the CMC is going to handle the surface better than the FV3, Euro and even the operational GFS.Only problem with this is the CMC runs on Tidbits are 00z and 12z so this seems a bit jumpier. The GFS over the past 4 runs has been fairly consistent with no significant shifts north or south.
View attachment 10412
Doesn't matter how it got there, it's there. At H5 it's identical to the 06z FV3, which is in lockstep with the 00z Euro. Zero chance the CMC is going to handle the surface better than the FV3, Euro and even the operational GFS.
Just for the record, the CMC p-type distribution is completely unrealistic and almost definitely erroneous as is it's surface low track given the H5 setup matches the FV3 and ECMWF. If I were working at a NWS office I wouldn't even consider it's solution.Fwiw the 06z Euro shifted back south some as did the 06z FV3. I think the FV3 is a northern outlier at this point. CMC often does better in CAD setups as well, the op GFS has a warm bias in these setups. There are a lot of moving pieces right now especially in the northern stream and with how all the energy interacts. We will continue seeing various solutions the next 24-36 hours until the energy comes onshore and things settle down. The CMC p-type depiction is the most reasonable given the overall synoptic setup IMO, someone is going to get a nasty ice storm.
I wouldn’t toss the CMC until the RGEM and NAM are within their day 2 ish wheelhouses, and have provided their input and I’d concur the CMC is not bad with CAD once it has a pulse on the large scale pattern which is usually its downfall. I’ve seen cases where the GFS & Euro are equally bad with CAD events, but the CMC usually can’t get the synoptic pattern right so often misses badly.Fwiw the 06z Euro shifted back south some as did the 06z FV3. I think the FV3 is a northern outlier at this point. CMC often does better in CAD setups as well, the op GFS has a warm bias in these setups. There are a lot of moving pieces right now especially in the northern stream and with how all the energy interacts. We will continue seeing various solutions the next 24-36 hours until the energy comes onshore and things settle down. The CMC p-type depiction is the most reasonable given the overall synoptic setup IMO, someone is going to get a nasty ice storm.
It does seem weird that the CMC shows rain northwest of sleet/ZR. Did not notice that. There could be a narrow icing corridor with cold rain to the south and east and sleet/snow to the north and west.Just for the record, the CMC p-type distribution is completely unrealistic and almost definitely erroneous as is it's surface low track given the H5 setup matches the FV3 and ECMWF. If I were working at a NWS office I wouldn't even consider it's solution.
Just for the record, the CMC p-type distribution is completely unrealistic and almost definitely erroneous as is it's surface low track given the H5 setup matches the FV3 and ECMWF. If I were working at a NWS office I wouldn't even consider it's solution.