Looks like u may have spoken too soon... legitimate threat is becoming apparentmuch weaker, no good, not as much CAA being pulled if its weaker View attachment 28088
Never mind, stronger now than it was last run at hour 150, likely gonna be more amped with more wrap around type precip
Perhaps, but also if one considered that the coldest relative to normal has been in the N US and the warmest S, that’s typical of the opposite, La Niña. Thanks largely to -GLAAM apparently.
This time around Raleigh looks like it might be in the bullseye. I love it! GSO-CLT-RDU
View attachment 28093
What is interesting is that a lot of gefs members from 18z had a similar type of snowfall pattern look ... it was either shifted north south east or west and or was bigger or smaller in size but overall most had some sort of shape and configuration as this ... all will come down to when and where phase occurs (and of course if but ... no one likes that question )Snow totals are not as bullish this run, but with a 980mb low, I wouldn’t be surprised if that changes
View attachment 28094
What is interesting is that a lot of gefs members from 18z had a similar type of snowfall pattern look ... it was either shifted north south east or west and or was bigger or smaller in size but overall most had some sort of shape and configuration as this ... all will come down to when and where phase occurs (and of course if but ... no one likes that question )
and many more to comeThis run sucks for us upstate sc folks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NC geography wise is just in a really good place to get hit with a lot of phases systems they love phasing off the coast and the configuration of the land makes it easy for somewhere in NC to score a lot of the timeAny chance this can shift west? Seems like NC is always the talk lol
I’m sorry man, but it’s 180 hrs out. The gfs will change so much look at how it handle pass system one run shouldn’t hype no one up.Snow totals are not as bullish this run, but with a 980mb low, I wouldn’t be surprised if that changes
View attachment 28094