Today's big hits on the market are almost entirely due to a d*** measuring contest between Saudi Arabia and Russia w/ an assist from coronavirus. Knowing the ruthlessness of OPEC and Putin, don't expect the price war to end anytime soon.
Russia can afford to have a price war longer than Saudi’s Arabia can. Who blinks first?
Given the Saudis literally have their economy built on oil, if they lose, they run the risk of collapsing or going to war.Russia can afford to have a price war longer than Saudi’s Arabia can. Who blinks first?
Why would you bank on Saudi Arabia when their GDP relies more on oil than Russia?So if I’m understanding this correctly here, we’re going to see who can produce oil for free (basically) the longest? My money is on ??
This is where I would approve the US government step in to assist our oil producers. It's in our national interest to stay self sufficient.
Exactly. I think the end game is to squeeze as many competitors out of the market as possible, including other OPEC countries. The Saudis can afford to play this game longer than the Russians—or st least that’s what they are betting.So if I’m understanding this correctly here, we’re going to see who can produce oil for free (basically) the longest? My money is on ??
I’m assuming they have more wealth on hand than Russia. I doubt they want to take that hit though. I’m not sure Russia cares one way or the other. Who knows? Who can stick their chest out the furthest? Stay tuned!Why would you bank on Saudi Arabia when their GDP relies more on oil than Russia?
Why would you bank on Saudi Arabia when their GDP relies more on oil than Russia?
Isn't it interesting how so many things converge at the same time: Coronavirus, OPEC disintegration, NK shooting missiles, Turkey/Syria/Russia conflict, locust plagues, new round of migrants heading toward the EU, etc.?
All we need now is an asteroid, a supervolcano eruption, a nuclear plant meltdown, or some kind of other natural disaster.
But the OPEC counties (and Russia) directly own or support their oil production. They can afford to take loses for long periods. Our producers need to be profitable to survive. If OPEC and Russia was to put our production out of service or worse come in and buy up the producers when they're down, they could then (again) use oil as leverage for their policies.Personally, I believe government bailouts need to end. Such bailouts prevent the market from doing what the market needs to do—which is return to balance. We can’t just keep bailing out everyone every time the market tries to correct.
They can increase production to offset a LARGE portion of the lower price results.Why would you bank on Saudi Arabia when their GDP relies more on oil than Russia?
Here's the problem though....bailouts allow for business that should exist to continue operation. An unprofitable business has no reason to innovate or do things better if they're having to rely on artificial price discovery or frequent injections of stimulus for support. The moral hazard in our economy is off the charts because of the continued bailouts, liquidity injections, and artificial monetary support that has existed for years now. It is not sustainable long-term, and it will eventually lead to the collapse of the economy.But the OPEC counties (and Russia) directly own or support their oil production. They can afford to take loses for long periods. Our producers need to be profitable to survive. If OPEC and Russia was to put our production out of service or worse come in and buy up the producers when they're down, they could then (again) use oil as leverage for their policies.