Heelyes
Member
Actually I was thinking removing Trump could keep the Dems from taking power.The Dems are so horrific you don't want them in control, the same Dems that would be in control if you got your wish in removing Trump? ?![]()
Actually I was thinking removing Trump could keep the Dems from taking power.The Dems are so horrific you don't want them in control, the same Dems that would be in control if you got your wish in removing Trump? ?![]()
Look at the map. 6 republican seats maybe will be considered contestable.The GOP has to defend 35 seats and the Dems 12
Republicans wont have a coordinated effort to falsify documents warrants etc to make a false case out of thin air on one occasion, let alone 2.Thats the difference. Always has been and will be.The Dems have never been in control and had this precedent to use to justify anything they want to do. If you think Obama was bad wait until a Dem uses Trump's playbook against republicans
Actually I was thinking removing Trump could keep the Dems from taking power.
?
I just think more would if he was impeached and the Dems probably won't beat pence or Trump. The Senate is what I'm referring to in the near term. If Trump wins but loses the Senate he is a lame duck .Because you believe Republicans arent going to show up in November?
I just think more would if he was impeached and the Dems probably won't beat pence or Trump. The Senate is what I'm referring to in the near term. If Trump wins but loses the Senate he is a lame duck .
Are you kidding me? Have you not seen the Biden video saying he’s leaving with the aid money if the prosecutor Is not fired, the one investigating corruption of the company Hunter was on the board of. That is the only quid pro quo that’s been proven with the testimony of the very own Joe Biden.The Trump supporters keep saying that but there is no real proof of anything, then on the other side there is tons of evidence and you guys act like there is nothing there. I guess it probably wouldn't matter even if there was ironclad proof of all of this anyways given todays vote....
Are you kidding me? Have you not seen the Biden video saying he’s leaving with the aid money if the prosecutor Is not fired, the one investigating corruption of the company Hunter was on the board of. That is the only quid pro quo that’s been proven with the testimony of the very own Joe Biden.
No not a bit. The Trump camp just hopes he keeps talking the next few months.Is it really surprising that Corn Pop was brilliant enough to say all that with HOT mics everywhere??? Nah, not really
No not a bit. The Trump camp just hopes he keeps talking the next few months.
Are you kidding me? Have you not seen the Biden video saying he’s leaving with the aid money if the prosecutor Is not fired, the one investigating corruption of the company Hunter was on the board of. That is the only quid pro quo that’s been proven with the testimony of the very own Joe Biden.
Yeah I’d definitely believe this article from the UK. There’s a whole more here than what they opened article of impeachment’s for against the president. Shame.If you guys took 10 mins to actually read legitimate sources and learn what is really going on then you would not make post like this one. The US wanted Shokin gone because he was crazy corrupt, Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma, the reason wasn't was was Shokin was bribing the owner to NOT investigate....even then Burisma was under investigation for a period of time several YEARS before Hunter joined the board...there is absolutely zero there...you guys think this is some kind of smoking gun and it simply isnt.
![]()
The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal
Donald Trump said Ukraine’s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his son’s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different storywww.independent.co.uk
“Neither Shokin nor Poroshenko wanted to investigate [Burisma owner Mykola] Zlochevsky,” says Sakvarelidze. “They simply began a criminal case, arrested a few assets, and began negotiating with the corruptioneer for a bribe.”
We don't have to read any article..... we have the video. We all can watch it, and most of us have watched it. We don't need someone telling us what we just saw. Why, for the love of God, are you trying to defend this man??? He's the personification of corruption.If you guys took 10 mins to actually read legitimate sources and learn what is really going on then you would not make post like this one. The US wanted Shokin gone because he was crazy corrupt, Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma, the reason wasn't was was Shokin was bribing the owner to NOT investigate....even then Burisma was under investigation for a period of time several YEARS before Hunter joined the board...there is absolutely zero there...you guys think this is some kind of smoking gun and it simply isnt.
![]()
The inside story of Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at the centre of Trump's latest scandal
Donald Trump said Ukraine’s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his son’s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different storywww.independent.co.uk
“Neither Shokin nor Poroshenko wanted to investigate [Burisma owner Mykola] Zlochevsky,” says Sakvarelidze. “They simply began a criminal case, arrested a few assets, and began negotiating with the corruptioneer for a bribe.”
What’s so comical about all of this is that they just tried to impeach a president on he said she said or I thought he meant this on the call when I heard it. Yet we have Sleepy Joe on video saying it in his own words and now they want us to believe he didn’t really mean it the way he said it. For the sake of America this clown show has got to stop.We don't have to read any article..... we have the video. We all can watch it, and most of us have watched it. We don't need someone telling us what we just saw. Why, for the love of God, are you trying to defend this man??? He's the personification of corruption.
Blindness. Total blindness to the truth, clouded by feelings of dislike. We are all capable of not seeing the truth, this is not a diss on anyone. Just a statement.What’s so comical about all of this is that they just tried to impeach a president on he said she said or I thought he meant this on the call when I heard it. Yet we have Sleepy Joe on video saying it in his own words and now they want us to believe he didn’t really mean it the way he said it. For the sake of America this clown show has got to stop.
We don't have to read any article..... we have the video. We all can watch it, and most of us have watched it. We don't need someone telling us what we just saw. Why, for the love of God, are you trying to defend this man??? He's the personification of corruption.
Its just what he says and does is not what you make it out to be.....the simple fact is the USA wanted Shokin gone because he was NOT investigating corruption enough, this includes Burisma, your entire argument about WHY "Biden" wanted Shokin gone is based on this concept that Biden did it to somehow protect his son, a son who was not even being investigated. The reality is that by getting Shokin removed the chances that Burisma would actually be seriously investigated went UP.....also Biden's actions where part of the overall US/Euro plan he was not acting alone when he did this he had nothing personal to gain from it....
So explain why Biden would want to get rid of the guy that as not even actively investigating his son or even the company he worked for, or better yet a guy that was easily bought off so he could be replaced by someone that potentially WOULD do those things if I knew my son and I were corrupt.