As I live and breath, I wish that anyone could offer a criticism of our current President without a rebuttal mentioning Obama or Hillary.
Back in the day, people used to criticize George W. And his defenders were able to offer rational, clear, concise explanations that didn't involve conspiracy theories or Al Gore or Tricky Bill Clinton. I remember, because I was one of them. That was back when I leaned GOP. A lot of us moderates did back then, and we don't anymore. A lot of the "base" would call us traitors, and just being influenced by the 'mainstream media'. But perhaps we should be looked instead as canaries in the coal mines.
Are the President's actions serious enough to warrant his removal from office? That's the 6 million dollar question. And if you don't believe it's serious enough, then what would? We should all be able to answer any of those questions regardless of political affiliation, or which direction the mainstream media leans towards.
If the answer is that you would support the President no matter what he's done (especially because of reasons involving the rival political party and what they have done, and SHOULD have been punished for) than it MIGHT indicate evidence of a cultlike devotion, or at the very least a very heavy bias. Here's hoping I'm wrong though. The way this thing is going, we're all about to find out how devoted some of the base really is.