• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Tropical Major Hurricane Irma (Part 1)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe east of Texas given the air it has here, coolest in months, that usually ends our season(it'd also be unusually early to be that cool)

But who knows I'm surprised the Euro was even that far south
 
gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_41.png
Well crap
 
A weaker system is more likely to stay south longer correct?

Typically this is the case because
A weaker system is more likely to stay south longer correct?

In a nutshell yes, because the stronger system has a deeper rossby penetration depth (defined here by the height at which the circulation of the TC is very evident in the column, stronger TCs w/ larger circulations & generally taller/more persistent convection = deeper rossby penetration depth). This means that a stronger TC is also steered by a deeper layer of the troposphere and given that the winds become increasingly westerly with height as a tropical cyclone ventures away from the tropics this often implies faster recurvature for stronger storms. In addition, a stronger storm is liable to gain latitude for another reason: beta drift, which refers to a tropical cyclones' tendency to move in the absence of any steering! Beta drift/the beta effect usually accounts for about 10% of a tropical cyclone's motion and is estimated to add ~2-5 m/s to its translational speed and would be the net movement a TC would undergo if there was no net steering influence from a trough or ridge. Coriolis deflection increases w/ increasing latitude from the equator, as does the planetary vorticity (planetary vorticity is just the spin imparted on phenomena simply from earth's rotation). Effectively what occurs especially as a tropical cyclone becomes fairly intense, is that the differential in planetary vorticity advection across the storm increases and this leads to a net NW motion as a pair of beta gyres (w/ opposing signs) forms on opposite ends of the storm in the northern hemisphere this happens in the NW & SE quadrants. To understand how this works (as shown in the diagram below) and how we get an anticyclonic beta gyre and vis versa in the SE quadrant, we have to know that for example on the east side of the cyclone in the northern hemisphere, as air blows northward it gains planetary vorticity, as the impact of earth's spin becomes greater closer to the pole and thus, going back to the statement of the conservation of absolute vorticity (where absolute vorticity is the sum of planetary + relative vorticity) relative vorticity must decrease if planetary vorticity increases, thereby forming and an anticyclonic beta gyre in the NW quadrant of the storm. On the other hand, as northerly flow occurs on the western side of the hurricane, air moving southward loses planetary vorticity (f becomes smaller), thus in order to conserve absolute vorticity again, relative vorticity has to increase, thereby forming a cyclonic gyre. The net flow between these two beta gyres in the northern hemisphere is to the northwest and this flow which essentially accounts for the beta effect becomes more prominent for stronger hurricanes because their circulations are larger and stronger and thus there's a larger gradient in planetary vorticity (f) across them!
There are certainly other ways to understand the impact of the beta effect on tropical cyclone track but I think this way is much easier to digest but it still can be difficult (as it was for me) the first few times I learned/read about it.

This diagram below shows what I was talking about above, notice the pair of opposing beta gyres orientated from SW-NE across the tropical cyclone's circulation and that the flow between them is to the northwest. This essentially means that in the absence of any steering flow, a tropical cyclone in the northern hemisphere will tend to move to the northwest, with stronger/larger tropical cyclones having a greater tendency to do so vs smaller/weaker TCs.

Hope this helps!

Screen Shot 2017-08-31 at 1.14.06 AM.png
 
Yeah I'm not sure how much I trust this recent Euro run in the longer term, it can't properly initialize Irma's intensity at all which definitely has an impact on its eventual track.
 
A ring of very deep convection has wrapped most of the way around Irma's circulation and a nascent eye is starting to become apparent, wouldnt be shocked if an eye popped out as early as tonight at the rate we're going...

GOES16_1km_ir_201708311200_12.25_22.00_-41.50_-25.25_ir1_weathernerds.gif
 
At any rate, no doubt the EPS shifted south again this run, getting closer to the Greater Antilles...
View attachment 1001
I notice that the Euro continues with the idea of the ULL in the long range and now the GFS as well, in fact I guess that's what allowed Irma's track get further west on the 06z GFS and basically rough house the OBX
 
Looks like 2 main clusters, roughly! The FL keys /west of FL or recurve to just miss the Carolinas coastline

Yeah and the southeast coastline atm is still sitting somewhere in the middle of the clustering. For the sake of Texas and Louisiana let's hope Irma does not go over the Greater Antilles because if it does, the chances of a landfall there would go up dramatically...
 
Typically this is the case because


In a nutshell yes, because the stronger system has a deeper rossby penetration depth (defined here by the height at which the circulation of the TC is very evident in the column, stronger TCs w/ larger circulations & generally taller/more persistent convection = deeper rossby penetration depth). This means that a stronger TC is also steered by a deeper layer of the troposphere and given that the winds become increasingly westerly with height as a tropical cyclone ventures away from the tropics this often implies faster recurvature for stronger storms. In addition, a stronger storm is liable to gain latitude for another reason: beta drift, which refers to a tropical cyclones' tendency to move in the absence of any steering! Beta drift/the beta effect usually accounts for about 10% of a tropical cyclone's motion and is estimated to add ~2-5 m/s to its translational speed and would be the net movement a TC would undergo if there was no net steering influence from a trough or ridge. Coriolis deflection increases w/ increasing latitude from the equator, as does the planetary vorticity (planetary vorticity is just the spin imparted on phenomena simply from earth's rotation). Effectively what occurs especially as a tropical cyclone becomes fairly intense, is that the differential in planetary vorticity advection across the storm increases and this leads to a net NW motion as a pair of beta gyres (w/ opposing signs) forms on opposite ends of the storm in the northern hemisphere this happens in the NW & SE quadrants. To understand how this works (as shown in the diagram below) and how we get an anticyclonic beta gyre and vis versa in the SE quadrant, we have to know that for example on the east side of the cyclone in the northern hemisphere, as air blows northward it gains planetary vorticity, as the impact of earth's spin becomes greater closer to the pole and thus, going back to the statement of the conservation of absolute vorticity (where absolute vorticity is the sum of planetary + relative vorticity) relative vorticity must decrease if planetary vorticity increases, thereby forming and an anticyclonic beta gyre in the NW quadrant of the storm. On the other hand, as northerly flow occurs on the western side of the hurricane, air moving southward loses planetary vorticity (f becomes smaller), thus in order to conserve absolute vorticity again, relative vorticity has to increase, thereby forming a cyclonic gyre. The net flow between these two beta gyres in the northern hemisphere is to the northwest and this flow which essentially accounts for the beta effect becomes more prominent for stronger hurricanes because their circulations are larger and stronger and thus there's a larger gradient in planetary vorticity (f) across them!
There are certainly other ways to understand the impact of the beta effect on tropical cyclone track but I think this way is much easier to digest but it still can be difficult (as it was for me) the first few times I learned/read about it.

This diagram below shows what I was talking about above, notice the pair of opposing beta gyres orientated from SW-NE across the tropical cyclone's circulation and that the flow between them is to the northwest. This essentially means that in the absence of any steering flow, a tropical cyclone in the northern hemisphere will tend to move to the northwest, with stronger/larger tropical cyclones having a greater tendency to do so vs smaller/weaker TCs.

Hope this helps!

View attachment 1000
363a0cccd721cdca8c3ae62fc3aab83d.gif


Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 
Yeah and the southeast coastline atm is still sitting somewhere in the middle of the clustering. For the sake of Texas and Louisiana let's hope Irma does not go over the Greater Antilles because if it does, the chances of a landfall there would go up dramatically...
Does that include Ms/Al to?
 
OBX nightmare but they're in the bulls-eye this far out so that might be a good thing.... either way dayum!
sfcwind_mslp.us_ma.png
 
Well, looks like we have anywhere from this going into the Gulf to hitting NC to going out to sea. Hope it curves out to sea, but seems it's leaning towards hitting somewhere, and I am afraid it's going to be the East coast.

Selfishly, I hope it misses the OBX. That's my favorite place to visit in NC.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Early on Euro is much stronger and further south with the Atlantic ridge which not only results in it's more southern track (within 5 days) but is also faster then other modeling, by the weekend we should really start to have an idea if this is going to be a threat to the Islands or not which in turn will give us a better idea of potential US threat
 
Were very likely to have an upgrade to Hurricane Irma within the hour. You can see the eye currently developing this morning.
 
Yeah and the southeast coastline atm is still sitting somewhere in the middle of the clustering. For the sake of Texas and Louisiana let's hope Irma does not go over the Greater Antilles because if it does, the chances of a landfall there would go up dramatically...

Asking for a friend cause he is an idiot wink wink. But are there statistics to that comment

Again asking for a friend
 
Looks like Hurricane Irma at 11:00 not to no one's surprise...

Hurricane IRMA
As of 12:00 UTC Aug 31, 2017:
Location: 16.7°N 33.4°W
Maximum Winds: 75 kt Gusts: N/A
Minimum Central Pressure: 987 mb
Environmental Pressure: 1012 mb
Radius of Circulation: 180 NM
Radius of Maximum Wind: 10 NM
Eye Diameter: N/A
 
I think everybody for the Bahamas to North Carolina better pay attention to this beast in the making
 
Typically this is the case because


In a nutshell yes, because the stronger system has a deeper rossby penetration depth (defined here by the height at which the circulation of the TC is very evident in the column, stronger TCs w/ larger circulations & generally taller/more persistent convection = deeper rossby penetration depth). This means that a stronger TC is also steered by a deeper layer of the troposphere and given that the winds become increasingly westerly with height as a tropical cyclone ventures away from the tropics this often implies faster recurvature for stronger storms. In addition, a stronger storm is liable to gain latitude for another reason: beta drift, which refers to a tropical cyclones' tendency to move in the absence of any steering! Beta drift/the beta effect usually accounts for about 10% of a tropical cyclone's motion and is estimated to add ~2-5 m/s to its translational speed and would be the net movement a TC would undergo if there was no net steering influence from a trough or ridge. Coriolis deflection increases w/ increasing latitude from the equator, as does the planetary vorticity (planetary vorticity is just the spin imparted on phenomena simply from earth's rotation). Effectively what occurs especially as a tropical cyclone becomes fairly intense, is that the differential in planetary vorticity advection across the storm increases and this leads to a net NW motion as a pair of beta gyres (w/ opposing signs) forms on opposite ends of the storm in the northern hemisphere this happens in the NW & SE quadrants. To understand how this works (as shown in the diagram below) and how we get an anticyclonic beta gyre and vis versa in the SE quadrant, we have to know that for example on the east side of the cyclone in the northern hemisphere, as air blows northward it gains planetary vorticity, as the impact of earth's spin becomes greater closer to the pole and thus, going back to the statement of the conservation of absolute vorticity (where absolute vorticity is the sum of planetary + relative vorticity) relative vorticity must decrease if planetary vorticity increases, thereby forming and an anticyclonic beta gyre in the NW quadrant of the storm. On the other hand, as northerly flow occurs on the western side of the hurricane, air moving southward loses planetary vorticity (f becomes smaller), thus in order to conserve absolute vorticity again, relative vorticity has to increase, thereby forming a cyclonic gyre. The net flow between these two beta gyres in the northern hemisphere is to the northwest and this flow which essentially accounts for the beta effect becomes more prominent for stronger hurricanes because their circulations are larger and stronger and thus there's a larger gradient in planetary vorticity (f) across them!
There are certainly other ways to understand the impact of the beta effect on tropical cyclone track but I think this way is much easier to digest but it still can be difficult (as it was for me) the first few times I learned/read about it.

This diagram below shows what I was talking about above, notice the pair of opposing beta gyres orientated from SW-NE across the tropical cyclone's circulation and that the flow between them is to the northwest. This essentially means that in the absence of any steering flow, a tropical cyclone in the northern hemisphere will tend to move to the northwest, with stronger/larger tropical cyclones having a greater tendency to do so vs smaller/weaker TCs.

Hope this helps!

View attachment 1000
I appreciate the detailed response! Per usual great info web
 
Holy crap!
11:00 AM AST Thu Aug 31
Location: 16.9°N 33.8°W
Moving: WNW at 10 mph
Min pressure: 979 mb
Max sustained: 100 mph
Ninja Brick: Well that escalated quickly!
 
So I'm curious can this early rapid intensification impact eventual track, ie: maybe spare US or does it not really matter with that honking atlantic ridge?
 
So I'm curious can this early rapid intensification impact eventual track, ie: maybe spare US or does it not really matter with that honking atlantic ridge?
I thought Webb said something about the stronger the storm, the more north it would tend to go? But that is a beast ridge!
 
I thought Webb said something about the stronger the storm, the more north it would tend to go? But that is a beast ridge!
Yeah generally that is the case but this seems to be a unique situation with the somewhat rare SW movement due to that ridge....
 
From NHC....
Given the strength of the ridge
and depth of the tropical cyclone, there are no obvious reasons to
discount the anomalous west-southwestward motion seen in most of the
guidance. Little change is made to the track forecast in short
range, but the track is shifted southward and westward at long
range, though not as far southwest as the overnight ECMWF and ECMWF
ensemble models.
 
Forecasted to become a cat 4 next week. Here we go again.

000
WTNT41 KNHC 311451
TCDAT1

Hurricane Irma Discussion Number 5
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL AL112017
1100 AM AST Thu Aug 31 2017

Satellite imagines indicate that Irma is rapidly intensifying.
Very deep convection has formed in the central dense overcast,
which is now displaying a small and clearing eye. Dvorak estimates
were up to 77 kt at 1200 UTC, and since the cloud pattern continues
to quickly become more organized, the initial wind speed is set to
85 kt.

Irma has moved somewhat south of and slower than all of the model
guidance since yesterday. Consequently, it stayed longer over the
warmer ocean temperatures away from the drier air to the north,
possibly allowing the rapid strengthening. Irma should move over
cooler waters tomorrow with some increase in mid-level dry air, so
hopefully the hurricane's intensity will level off by then. In a
few days, the hurricane will be moving over warmer waters with light
shear shown by all of the model guidance. This should promote
further strengthening of Irma, and the NHC forecast shows an
extremely dangerous category 4 hurricane next week, similar to the
solutions provided by the HWRF and the ECMWF models. The intensity
forecast is raised considerably from the previous one due to initial
trends, and is on the high end of the guidance at long range.

The hurricane has turned west-northwestward at about 9 kt. This
motion should continue for the next day or so before a ridge builds
over the central Atlantic Ocean. This ridge should force Irma to
turn westward by the weekend, and west-southwestward early next
week. Guidance continues to trend southward, following the trend of
the ECMWF model starting yesterday. Given the strength of the ridge
and depth of the tropical cyclone, there are no obvious reasons to
discount the anomalous west-southwestward motion seen in most of the
guidance. Little change is made to the track forecast in short
range, but the track is shifted southward and westward at long
range, though not as far southwest as the overnight ECMWF and ECMWF
ensemble models.
Like this
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top