Clayton
Member
True, true. But something huge makes it more exciting and worthwhile. Idk why, but the little stuff like flurries and a dusting and inch or so snows aren't as exciting as when I was younger. Most of us don't take the time to care about the dynamics. We just want a major storm like historic ones that happened when we weren't alive yet and we just get impatient tbh. If looking at the Dynamics is just as fun as a big storm I'm all for it. But it can be frustrating to watch these big dynamics and nothing big to show for it. And I'm all for benign weather but we get that warm , benign stuff all throughout spring and summer, so why not have a genuine natural winter for a change? I definitely gotta work on my appreciation tho. Thanks for the input. God, just imagine what the historic storms of the past must have been like here in Atlanta! 10 inches of snow in 1936 and 1940! I would kill for that! But alas, we are not as fortunate anymore haha.I'm a lot like you in this regard. This is 100% the honest truth - the reason I am a meteorologist today is because of one event, but the reason behind it is because I became so fascinated with why the forecasts were so awful for that event that I started trying to dig into the data to see why broadcast meteorologists -- and if I'm being honest, it was Greg Fishel -- were so bad at predicting snow here. It was kind of the perfect storm, I had become somewhat interested in forecasting over the past several years and this was such an epic forecast bust it really ignited the fire. As much as I love the big events, sometimes I get almost equal jollies out of figuring out when something is going to be a non-event while most everyone else is expecting something huge.
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~nwsfo/storage/cases/20041226/