Jessy89
Member
To be fair the icon only went to 120hrs so who knows where it was headed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There was an ice storm for CLT metro during January 1994, between the Arctic outbreaks that saw the low track up just west of the mountains and do a transfer to a coastal up off the Maryland coast. That one put significant icing throughout the Piedmont as the CAD locked in. The coastal sections warmed up to close to 70 with thunderstorms while CLT only topped out at 33 after latent heatingLol I just can’t get over how dogshit these H5 looks are (euro/v16) and they still show wintry precip, that’s how you know the cold airmass is legit
It’s was colder and had a stronger/more wound TPV then last run. That would result in a stronger SE Canada vortex = more CAATo be fair the icon only went to 120hrs so who knows where it was headed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It was way colder and TPV was further southeast and way stronger. We know exactly where it was headedTo be fair the icon only went to 120hrs so who knows where it was headed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The end of the RGEM was similar. Stronger and further south with the TPV.It was way colder and TPV was further southeast and way stronger. We know exactly where it was headed
It was way colder and TPV was further southeast and way stronger. We know exactly where it was headed
Well I can tell you and inland track wouldn’t be possible with the look that the ICON had.I’m mostly speaking of the track of the system. Late bloomer in Atlantic. Or blooms in the gulf. Does it go inland. Etc so many variables to iron out with this
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Until 12z when it shows something else. I mean really, we ought to just stop looking out past 84-96 right now. Maybe check the ensembles for signals. The snow that part of NE GA, Upstate SC, and Western NC didn’t even start getting worked out until inside 72 hoursThere’s the cave View attachment 73235