Stormlover
Member
I hear you, and that's a fair point. But we're still to warm to snow or ice. I imagine we'll see some changes coming up. But we're not talking about the evolution of a storm system as much as we are large scale pattern features which are continuing to trend the wrong way. Models are pretty bad beyond day 5, but we need to see a rapid turn-around and then a trend back the other way very, very soon, or this will be another big rain or even tstorm maker for most of us.This was the 12Z run of the GFS on Jan 29th or roughly the same time frame out from today that todays runs are from the Kong storm......it only missed NC temps by 20-25 degrees...
View attachment 71786
Well, it didn't matter it looks like...Still need that TPV further SE for sure.
I hear you, and that's a fair point. But we're still to warm to snow or ice. I imagine we'll see some changes coming up. But we're not talking about the evolution of a storm system as much as we are large scale pattern features which are continuing to trend the wrong way. Models are pretty bad beyond day 5, but we need to see a rapid turn-around and then a trend back the other way very, very soon, or this will be another big rain or even tstorm maker for most of us.
Go to 174Heavy snow in buffalo View attachment 71798
I think what you mention about pattern recognition is why most mets... like the CPC and the outlooks they issued even after the 12z model runs...I’m honestly perplexed with this set up. I’m my 20 plus years of model watching, you do acquire a sense of pattern recognition, or at least a sense of what is a “typical” pattern for air masses. I still think the models are way off with this one. Not that I anticipate a huge winter storm, but it makes more sense to me to have this trend further SE for a winter storm, or for there to be severe weather with the front followed by sharp cold as the air mass bleeds forward. This crazy CAD look with all the ice the models are spitting out just doesn’t make sense to me. I expect more big changes.