• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern Januworry

Webberweather53 said:
I thought this response may be appropriate for the main thread here.

La Nina + West Pacific MJO constructively interfering w/ one another. You get slower-moving, high amplitude planetary waves that are difficult to damp/wash out, which also feed back onto the MJO circulation and slow it down against the -NAO, easterly QBO, and that are attempting to push it out into the W hem (which I thought was more likely in the long-run). I had a feeling tho an unforeseen slow down like this could occur and would delay any pattern change out east (vs what models were showing at the time, which was phase 8 by Dec 20-25) and was hoping/banking on it not being this bad s.t. by the time we entered the New Year, we'd at least have some glances of a decent pattern in early-mid January. Have to admit, my confidence in that scenario is starting to decrease a little the past day or two, but I still feel that's realistically by comparison to the rest of winter (except perhaps March?), our best window overall to see cold/snow prior to February, when have to start working really hard against the grain of unfavorable Feb Nina climo on top of a warmer basic state climate and crappy initial pattern (lots of early winter -PNA) all trying to keep us warmer/drier/less snowy than normal. We can get decent patterns in Nina Februarys, but they are few and far in between.
Click to expand...
Thank you Eric. Makes sense. I truly feel like a -PNA the biggest player in this pattern
 
I think it was @Ollie Williams that posted the Dec 2010-Jan 2011 pattern but I can't find it now. It may have been Webber. Either way it was a west based -NAO and also had an Aleutian ridge and no ridging out west and we still were cold and had snow. I don't get it. I'm going to join @Rain Cold on the dark side and agree this is a very persistent stubborn pattern and it holds on regardless of what the indices say and only breaks when it wants to. We clearly don't understand all the forces at work that drive patterns.
 
RainlessSnowless & Grumpy said:
I think it was @Ollie Williams that posted the Dec 2010-Jan 2011 pattern but I can't find it now. It may have been Webber. Either way it was a west based -NAO and also had an Aleutian ridge and no ridging out west and we still were cold and had snow. I don't get it. I'm going to join @Rain Cold on the dark side and agree this is a very persistent stubborn pattern and it holds on regardless of what the indices say and only breaks when it wants to. We clearly don't understand all the forces at work that drive patterns.
Click to expand...
EAFBB09A-A69B-4623-9D28-CAA0E596CE68.png
 
RainlessSnowless & Grumpy said:
I think it was @Ollie Williams that posted the Dec 2010-Jan 2011 pattern but I can't find it now. It may have been Webber. Either way it was a west based -NAO and also had an Aleutian ridge and no ridging out west and we still were cold and had snow. I don't get it. I'm going to join @Rain Cold on the dark side and agree this is a very persistent stubborn pattern and it holds on regardless of what the indices say and only breaks when it wants to. We clearly don't understand all the forces at work that drive patterns.
Click to expand...
B5772DC2-E367-4529-8DC1-0E727706D21A.gif
 
Ollie Williams said:
View attachment 98657
Click to expand...
Thank you sir. That's definitely not close to what we have now. We had ridging in western Canada then with energy undercutting it. A thing of beauty. Not sure what time frame I'm thinking of then. There was definitely a composite on here within the last couple days that had a similar pattern to what's modeled now with a different result.
 
Myfrotho704_ said:
View attachment 98658
Click to expand...
If anything that ridge is slightly west of where it is now. Maybe that's what we need to root for instead of trying to push it east toward the west coast. Push it west and let the -NAO do work. Without the -NAO you'd definitely want it closer to the west coast though.
 
RainlessSnowless & Grumpy said:
If anything that ridge is slightly west of where it is now. Maybe that's what we need to root for instead of trying to push it east toward the west coast. Push it west and let the -NAO do work. Without the -NAO you'd definitely want it closer to the west coast though.
Click to expand...
Yeo, classic -WPO pattern, not the weird central Aleutian islands ridge, sort of like that CFS run a few days ago
 
Will Rossman said:
Thanks, I appreciate your detailed explanation to get me up to speed with the mood swings today in the board. I agree there isn't much speaking for a colder January at the moment, but I would also argue that we aren't seeing a lot saying torch for the southeast US for the foreseeable future. There is no persistent consistency among the major model suites that all point to above average week after week with no cold shots in between. If the MJO continues its progression along 7 and then lower amplitude toward the COD or 8, I don't see how that would be a bad pattern for the south. I grant that this doesn't mean we get a string of below average days, but I also don't want to shelve any ideas of cool weather in early January for the south. Maybe others can help explain as well.
Click to expand...
I don't think it's written in stone anywhere for us not to have a period in January where it gets cold. And I don't mean to indicate that the models are showing an unending torch pattern. They're not. They could be, and that would be bad. The cold could be out of NA completely. That would be bad. But that's not the case either. But in any event, it seems pretty unlikely that we'll slip into a favorable winter pattern for the SE within the next two weeks. Doesn't mean it for sure won't happen. But it would be unwise to consider that the most likely outcome.
 
Ollie Williams said:
View attachment 98657
Click to expand...

Some minor differences over the N Pacific between then & this year in the grand scheme of things. There's still a ridge over the Gulf of Alaska (like now), but it's suppressed because Sea of Okhotsk/NE Russia vortex extends out into the Bering Sea and is flattening it. To get a look like that, we need the NE Russia vortex to extend/come out more into the Bering Sea and suppress the Gulf of Alaska ridge, while also providing a momentum boost to the N Pacific jet that would kick the western trough out into the Great Plains states. This sort of evolution would normally happen in MJO phase 8 when the Pacific jet responds to increased westerly momentum from dateline convection, but we're playing against ENSO in that regard and it's a little harder than usual to get the MJO out there despite the easterly QBO and -NAO trying to tug it east.

gfs-ensemble-all-avg-nhemi-z500_anom-1016800.png
 
Myfrotho704_ said:
The only good thing about this gefs run is the stronger -NAO, that’s about it, I hope it can stay as long as possible. Because if it breaks down with that pac look, the SER is gonna be relentless View attachment 98664
Click to expand...

I definitely do not like these 48 hr (8-run) trends over the Pacific.

We have 2 ways to get out of this GOA ridge pattern synoptically. Either:

1) amp the Pacific wave pattern and send the ridge up into Alaska and the Arctic as a strong, high-latitude -EPO, allowing the Pacific jet to undercut and replace the GOA ridge w/ a trough (a better/viable long-term solution but don't have much confidence there)

OR

2) Briefly suppress the GOA ridge with an intrusive NE Russia vortex that moves out into the Bering Sea along w/ extension of the Pacific jet (need more central Pacific convection for that, harder to come by in a La Nina admittedly).


A GOA ridge isn't necessarily the end of the world on its own, we're just in a endless purgatory w/ a slightly amped, quasi-stationary ridge just south of Alaska. Moving it any direction at this point w/ a west-based -NAO would yield a better pattern for us.

gfs-ens_z500trend_namer_25.png
 
Webberweather53 said:
I definitely do not like these 48 hr (8-run) trends over the Pacific.

We have 2 ways to get out of this GOA ridge pattern synoptically. Either:

1) amp the Pacific wave pattern and send the ridge up into Alaska and the Arctic as a strong, high-latitude -EPO, allowing the Pacific jet to undercut and replace the GOA ridge w/ a trough (a better/viable long-term solution but don't have much confidence there)

OR

2) Briefly suppress the GOA ridge with an intrusive NE Russia vortex that moves out into the Bering Sea along w/ extension of the Pacific jet (need more central Pacific convection for that, harder to come by in a La Nina admittedly).


A GOA ridge isn't necessarily the end of the world on its own, we're just in a endless purgatory w/ a slightly amped, quasi-stationary ridge just south of Alaska. Moving it any direction at this point w/ a west-based -NAO would yield a better pattern for us.

View attachment 98665
Click to expand...

Time of the year is also critical here and why these teleconnections (esp PNA) are seasonally dependent. If it was say late Feb or March instead, when the wavelengths are shorter, you can fit more waves between us and that GOA ridge, and we probably find ourselves inside a trough axis instead of a ridge w/ the block over the Baffin Bay. Sigh
 
Just saw the latest EURO seasonal January map on wx twitter. Not good for the Carolina’s it’s above temps just slightly but the precip is much below normal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top