NAM looks wonky with the slp track/placement and precip distribution. Don't get me wrong, we're getting warm-nosed. But the alleged track on the NAM is close to really good for our area. I guess in the end, we're talking about the LR NAM, so it's kinda moot anyway.The nam did have most of central nc starting as snow or rain quickly changing to snow
View attachment 62989
But you can see the change over and was lurking on the backside of the band. How widespread and heavy that band is will be a big key for us. If it's a thick heavy band maybe we can drop a quick half inch to 2 inches on the front and maybe out perform the cooling aloft shown on the models and hold off the warm nose for an extra hour. A change to rain almost seems certain for the middle of the event
Agreed. These QPF distributions look really wonky on everything but the EPS to me. Even if it's rain, it should likely be more evenly distributed than what is showing - I can only assume convective feedback issues with the low transfer to the Gulf Stream is plaguing many of these runs. The biggest thing to focus on is the H5/H7/H85/SLP tracks and attendant frontogenesis.NAM looks wonky with the slp track/placement and precip distribution. Don't get me wrong, we're getting warm-nosed. But the alleged track on the NAM is close to really good for our area. I guess in the end, we're talking about the LR NAM, so it's kinda moot anyway.
What causes the heavier accumulation to skip over central NC and end up farther east?
and gfs has less precip over the charlotte area, with sfc temps 37ish it showed mainly rain with less precip to cool the column.Too warm at the surface. GFS warms the surface from 35 to 36 during the event.