Yep. Definitely odd. Low deeper and closer to the coast. Basically from off JAX to just off MYR and less precip inland. Weird.The low is closer but less precip thrown to the West. Make sense.
Ughhhh! Grenville SC is out!
well, not a good start....
Yep, looks that way. I don't understand how it can be stronger and closer to the coast and be less moisture?Yep. Definitely odd. Low deeper and closer to the coast. Basically from off JAX to just off MYR and less precip inland. Weird.
NAM 3km will be similar. Goodbye insane inland NC snow.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Got a pic, Eric? If you don't mind?The TT 12km NAM reflectivity maps are bad, there's still snow into the eastern piedmont of NC on this run verbatim
No, just hate when people say one run different from the other runs is a trend. One run is not the definition of the word trend.Ok, wait till 6z then. It doesn’t mean we can’t get snow. You’re too emotional about this. There are still plenty of snow scenarios on the table. It would be nice for a global to show some of them.
Agreed. It would be more accurate to say that the nam took a step towards the other models.No, just hate when people say one run different from the other runs is a trend. One run is not the definition of the word trend.
No way to sugar coat it, not a good run!
Whats funny is the sfc low is closer to the coast yet less precip....ya....there is no easy way to say this, but what changes on the NAM both 12km and 3km and not in a good way....NAM=FAIL this run for sure.With the later phase, the pull is not as pronounced NW this run...inverted trough is still there, but less warm nosing apparent with a thinner transitional line...
That’s semantics. The bottom line is, the early phase that the Nam was showing that was absent on all the other models is gone. That tells me that the Nam was probably wrong. That isn’t Debbie Downer. It’s just an unfortunate fact.Agreed. It would be more accurate to say that the nam took a step towards the other models.
Whats funny is the sfc low is closer to the coast yet less precip....ya....there is no easy way to say this, but what changes on the NAM both 12km and 3km and not in a good way....NAM=FAIL this run for sure.
in NC it's all about sfc lp track. Yea a super jacked up lp is nice but a weaker one hugging the SC coast and on a more north trajectory will get enough qpf to whiten the brown ground.Actually 3km is good for NC and thats about it...even GA and SC coastlines...forget about inland GA and SC this run
Last frame is the newest. Much further East with precip shield for GA/SC especially. This is like 4 NAM runs.
![]()
Yep a good run and highlights the snow 9n the NW side much better.I'm riding the 3k NAM to glory or the glorious cliff...
![]()
I hope it works for y'all for sureYep a good run and highlights the snow 9n the NW side much better.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Wow, that's a huge shift East. How depressing.Last frame is the newest. Much further East with precip shield for GA/SC especially. This is like 4 NAM runs.
![]()
Looks great, 5" where I live and still3k nam looks great for the eastern nc Piedmont. Some totals over a foot. Over 10” for Raleigh. We toss?