After the 00z runs tomorrow, if things don't trend better, i think it may be time to focus on the day 8ish potential if it remains. Eric's been alluding to this for a bit, he may be on to something.The NAM, looks like a fail for the midweek wave; stringing it out already. Of course, NYE/NYD, outside a little moisture making it through the low dewpoints, is dead.
maybe a little Cumberland Plateau snow shower activity if this model is right... hey, CHA could sneak in a flurry or two.This is supposed to account for evaporation, so this is what you have based on the 12KM NAM for accumulated precipitation from NYE/NYD:
After the 00z runs tomorrow, if things don't trend better, i think it may be time to focus on the day 8ish potential if it remains. Eric's been alluding to this for a bit, he may be on to something.
I concur with you on that as well, as far as waiting until it's about 2 to 3 days out. I also think, maybe, we shouldn't start up possible storm threads, until about that time frame as well. Just a suggestion obviously. Considering how model trends have been for us down here as of late.I posted in the January thread that the later range Euro was interesting in regards to all of that stuff. I don't want to get ahead of myself though. If this mid week system fails us, I'll slink away and not pay much attention to these threats until 2 days or so out from now on.
Any improvement at all is a welcome sight. We need all the help we can get. I'm hoping today we can get something positive going our way with the model trends. Yesterday was not good at all quite frankly. I think the UKMET was not too bad though. I wish i could see what it did on the frame prior to 144hr.Well, 06z GFS is going to be an improvement with the midweek wave. Likely too late, but an improvement.
Indeed it is! Close to something bigger here for us Carolina folks.Better:
If it phases too early, don't you run the risk of it, coming too far North though, or in a setup/pattern like this, that wouldn't be of a concern? I am tired of the folks in the Northeast getting in on the goods.
Yeah, January thread for that one sounds good. So , the low was closer to the coast. Sounds good, but based on trends, i don't know if it will sustain that look. Hoping it's the start of a trend more close to the coast on all of the models. Would be fantastic if we could get it to bomb out.I'd rather see if hugging the coast at this point; because the trend is not our friend. With that said, this run was a bit wonky on the surface reflection.
Guess what though! There is a wave coming in off Cali this run, where it goes; who knows. Guess we can use the January thread for that one.
Yeah, January thread for that one sounds good. So , the low was closer to the coast. Sounds good, but based on trends, i don't know if it will sustain that look. Hoping it's the start of a trend more close to the coast on all of the models. Would be fantastic if we could get bomb out.
Well, that's true. Let's see what today's model runs/trends hold in store for us. If they don't look good, i think we need to shift our focus on the period in time Eric was referring to. Especially since you indicated you saw a wave coming in via So Cal. That could be our ticket.I wouldn't say it was closer to the coast so to speak. I'd say the surface reflection was wonky with two low pressure centers, it's still a miss, even for the coast. Just a slightly better look at H5. It was able to get a lot more precipitation going. This close to the event, we need to see many more changes. The idea of a phase to help us out, or the idea of digging enough to pop the low closer to our coast, is waning.