Cary_Snow95
Member
Not gonna happen, but that would shut N FL down.Here's the last panel from the 18z RGEM
Lead wave looks sw so farLOL here comes the gfs
Slightly better than 12z18z GFS sticks to its guns...wont happen this run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wonder what models they mets went with before the Jan 2000 storm.I definitely would put a lot more stock on the mesoscale models like the NAM and RGEM in a situation like this where resolving convection matters a lot in the forecast and none of the globals are capable of doing it. I just don't think people realize how much these solutions are capable of differing even at this range in a setup like this.
RGEM total wise, doesn't look quite as impressive as the NAM. Barely makes it to CAE
I wonder what models they mets went with before the Jan 2000 storm.
Sounds like what the long range models are doing now.ETA, and it failed. Kept precip mainly coast as rain and off the coast.
Well virtually non of the models back then even had anything 48 hours out, in the case study analysis I performed on the event earlier this semester I think I the higher res models caught on just a split second sooner than the globals but by then it was almost too late. While we have come a ways since that time I definitely think the high res models are the way to go. The coarser global NWP have almost unanimously shifted west over the past few days apart from the NAVGEM which was the western outlier from the onsetI wonder what models they mets went with before the Jan 2000 storm.
I guess if this was to happen NWS CAE would issue something at the last secondAnd those large changes are based directly by 500mb and a slower phase. Timing and amplification is everything here. We had the RGEM closing the lead wave off, teasing a very big SE snowstorm, it opened back up, and was too late.
The models usually do a piss poor job with handling the northwesterly extent and intensity of the precip shield in events like this so I'm not sure or very confident that we'll see a consistent shift SE over the next day or so, if anything more NW adjustments seem probable given everything at handIf I were a betting man, I'd go with the RGEM. NAM likely over-amping this and the globals are under-amping this. As Alan(RaleighWx) also noted in a tweet, the arctic kicker dropping down is going to funnel in too much dry air in the mid-levels and cause a sharp cut-off in the SE.