1042 working it’s way into SE Canada seems workable. That’ll do for many.
1042 working it’s way into SE Canada seems workable. That’ll do for many.
One of the CIP's analogs is 2/6/10. This is just a hair further south and 2/6/10 had marginal air mass like this potential...maybe worse.
View attachment 62097View attachment 62098View attachment 62096View attachment 62095
Lol seems set in stone right?![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, said this earlier, this is giving me flashbacks to Feb 2010. 2/6/10 analog for this potential but maybe further south. I do think 77 corridor in NC could see accumulating snowfall...north of I-40.
![]()
This isn't good. Guess who's back.
348 hour gfs isn't good![]()
This isn't good. Guess who's back.
Damn NPAC blocks, moves out tho![]()
I know this is long range GFS and it will change after the run but guess who's back.
Got a pretty good feeling that we’re gonna hand off the first storm or two in this pattern to the mid Atlantic. We could use a little snow cover to our north to help further lock in this great pattern. As we see a few storms run their course thru the first half of the month and lay some snow down to our north, the Greenland block begins to couple with the stratosphere, & continues retrograding poleward and westward, the air masses that plunge southward will become increasingly deeper/colder as we get into mid-January
Hence, I think the mid Atlantic and perhaps the mountains could score here inside the first 10-12 days of the January. Our window in the SE probably does not legitimately open up until about Jan 15 or so given the above info, but it should last for basically the rest of January at a minimum and given the SSWE, February is also looking favorable atm
And right on cue you can see the SER tries to resist it getting deep into the SE. Always a risk with that kind of setup, especially in La Niña with a very warm W PAC and a warm AMO.
But i mean even there only 2 or 3" ? Not exactly a huge snow event.12z CMCE, looks good for the MA especially View attachment 62107
Post some of those good memes you used to do! For indices and such! Please
Coldest anomalies in the world headed to US! That’s awesome!
But i mean even there only 2 or 3" ? Not exactly a huge snow event.
We're gonna have to take some chances to get legit cold injected into this pattern & give folks near & south of I-40 a real chance to snow. -NAO alone isn't gonna cut it as we're finding out in early Jan, but I doubt there would be much of a SE ridge if the -NAO also doesn't go away.
I hope not but:
1. We now have sub -3 AO and +1 PNA along with -1 NAO. I’d take continuation of that combo anytime. The nasty SER has been so persistent the last few years that I’d rather not give it a chance by losing the +PNA.
2. I’m much deeper SE then you and thus am more vulnerable to control by the SER. For my area and nearby to have the best chance to stay with near or BN temps, the SER needs to stay away. I’m not even thinking about wintry precip here as that is quite rare. I’m just thinking about avoiding what had recently dominated here in winter until the wonderful Dec of 2020, AN temps. Just keep the +PNA and I’ll take my chances. But alas, that’s going to be tough to do.
3. I’m also keeping in mind that the models have quite often underestimated the SER in the medium range. Maybe a persistent -NAO would reduce that chance but I’d still rather just keep the +PNA.
That’s IF the strong -AO and -NAO remain, a big if.
The good news is that the GEFS still maintains a decent +PNA. That’s what I want to see more than anything else:
View attachment 62110
I actually don't think -NAO is a big IF here, arguably one of the more predictable features in the coming several weeks. When you have a strong -NAO that then couples to the stratosphere in the form of a sudden stratospheric warming event, that's the best recipe to get an extremely persistent and strong -NAO that lasts for weeks & weeks on end, very much like late Feb-Mar 2013, & late Jan-Feb 2010. Simon Lee's research has shown that even a 1 sigma below average polar vortex is 7x more likely to produce -NAO than "normal" conditions and we'll have a much weaker vortex than -1 sigma here so the odds are likely even more in our favor.
Good point! I wasn’t thinking about the nice upcoming SSW. That indeed is encouraging to keep -AO/-NAO dominating.
Yep..... loving the trends of the past few days.CAD wedge crushjob!
And Big Frosty too
This is gonna have a footprint similar to that of dec 19 2009. Amounts TBD.@Webberweather53 i see what your saying, kinda shocked how good this looks with a ULL in that position.... right ? View attachment 62115View attachment 62116