Imagine if we can slow our southern wave a little bit more to allow a slightly quicker phase instead of a more late one, that’s a big dog for much of NCChangeover:
View attachment 61991
What about upstateImagine if we can slow our southern wave a little bit more to allow a slightly quicker phase instead of a more late one, that’s a big dog for much of NC
Wow that’s beautifulView attachment 61993
That looks fine this far out. Pretty good look. IMO. Suppressed look with high pressure to the north. Looks like a nice Miller A in the works.Ehh
Lol seems like when we have the NS energy around the right spot, our wave wants to shear out View attachment 61997
This block won’t retrograde into the conus, strong pacific jet undercutting the block, lateral mixing by planetary waves and more favorable forcing for blocking in the arctic vs far N Atlantic will shift the epicenter further N late in the month.I’m looking at a full on retrograding of the NA block down through central Canada and CONUS, vs an inflection point. Obviously not indicated at this stage, but a prelude for many majors.
Honestly nobody in NC outside the mountains has a legit chance to see accumulating snow out of this at the moment. Just isn’t enough cold air.Eric’s just salty Fayetteville doesn’t have a chance.![]()
Bowling ball? Spare meBowling ball after the first system would work View attachment 61959
Day 7-10 are split on how well this performs...Bowling ball? Spare me
Gutter ball, gutters runningBowling ball? Spare me
But there’s no legit chance of this being good for anyone outside of the mountains ... I don’t believe so euro has been on this ... the air is barely not cold enough any trend just a bit colder as the euro just did would mean big things for anyone in NC .. keep an eye on this one it’s becoming thread worthy quickly
With the amount of blocking I wouldn’t worry yet, something could easily sneak into the 50/50 region/NE and serve as confluence under the block, For example the euro, Ensemble mean won’t show that well atmIt still kind of bothers me that with this look, the mean looks relatively crappy after out ULL potential. I know I shouldn’t look too much into that stuff, but I find it surprising. I guess that’s because it’s too warm. From what Webber’s been saying, I’m not buying that yet.
View attachment 62013
View attachment 62014
Random -- do you know if MJO phase is uniformly distributed (e.g. is Phase 1 equally likely to Phase 6?)?
This is something I’ve noticed for the last several weeks. The MJO has been very low amped for the most part and at times has been in COD. The last several winters you could look at the MJO and see it going very close to the outside of the charts.
I need to learn more about the MJO... are there outlier cases of Eastern US cold that don't fall in the cold phases?Based on extensive analysis of several decades of KATL temp data, I found that during January that inside the COD has averaged markedly colder than outside. The January results are actually here in the blog:
Link:
SE US daily winter temperature anomaly analysis by MJO phase: inside the left side of circle coldest | SouthernWX
Likely related to this, ALL major ATL icestorms since the monthly MJO charts started occurred when it was inside the circle! However, the size of the sample being pretty small is very likely skewing the true underlying probability of major ATL ZR inside vs outside COD a pretty good amount.
I need to learn more about the MJO... are there outlier cases of Eastern US cold that don't fall in the cold phases?
There are a decent number of outliers going both ways as the MJO is but one of several major impacting factors. The best chance to find cold outside of the cold phases in January (with that chance highest inside left side of circle) is inside the right half of the circle as opposed to outside of the circle in the right side
Okay so if I’m reading this correct for January (cold -> warm): 1. Inside left 2. Cold phases 3. Inside right
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Shreveport Special...