ajr
Member
You get that block a little stronger, things will trend south some and slow down enough to perhaps let that N/S wave get involved, if it's real.If we can keep this System the same latitude, or even further south, and also keep strengthening that stuff around SE Canada, the storm will begin to pull in those colder 850s from it, getting close to that already View attachment 60732View attachment 60733
Is this a Miller A kind of setup hereStill largely suppression on the GEFS but a few closer members and 1 that goes boomView attachment 60736View attachment 60737
Yes.Is this a Miller A kind of setup here
The ones that do develop precip show a good bit of snow. That's good.Still largely suppression on the GEFS but a few closer members and 1 that goes boomView attachment 60736View attachment 60737
Miller A is not good for the upstate rightYes.
Sometimes can be, but often times can be screwjobs thereMiller A is not good for the upstate right
One thing to remember is that the GFS has had a warm bias at the surface in this range lately. So if we can trim off about 3-4 degrees then most of NC could be in business.Stupid close, if we deepen this H5 cutoff there you go View attachment 60728
Miller As are just fine or total crap. It all depends on the track of the storm and the strength and placement of the cold air.Miller A is not good for the upstate right
They can work for the eastern part of the upstate fairly well, but back towards Greenville/Spartanburg you’ll want to see the wave move along like a southern slider so that you can have an overrunning set up before the coastal really gets crankingMiller A is not good for the upstate right
The transition from rain to snow can be very narrow with one location seeing mostly rain while 10 miles to the northwest is getting slammed with heavy snow. Also the cut off of precip on the west side can be painfully sharp as well. During the Crusher I was in an area that got 10-12 inches while 8 miles to the southeast had 18-20 and 6 miles to the northwest only had 3-4.Miller As are just fine or total crap. It all depends on the track of the storm and the strength and placement of the cold air.
The important thing to note about Miller As is that they have a very narrow transition zone between rain and snow. Where the boundary sets up is determined by the track of the system. I wouldn’t throw out a general statement that Miller As favor one area over another in order to make any sort of a prediction. It really comes down to the synoptic evolution of any given storm.
IF we keep seeing the block get stronger, I'd grow more confident in more of the SE seeing wintery as opposed to getting whiffed to the NE. But it is 2020, so.... hahaHonestly I’m more Worried about handing this storm off to the northeast/upper MA
Definitely agree. Actually had some light freezing rain this morning here. 3k NAM is showing the Wednesday potential as well.Still could be some onset ice on Wednesday per the NAM, wouldn’t sleep on this given more than modeled low level WAA > earlier precip onset, and dewpoints will be in the upper teens/low 20s vs our past event which had dews in the mid to upper 20s for most
View attachment 60743View attachment 60745View attachment 60746View attachment 60747
Wow the GEFS really said F U to that trough mess out west ... hello +PNA?
Dang when the wheels falls off of that sort of pattern that’s basically it, wonder how long the block will stayPac Jet extends on the GEFS
View attachment 60752
then it retracts
View attachment 60753
the extension leads to a GOA low
View attachment 60754
the retraction allows for ridging to start developing along the west coast into AK
View attachment 60755
Also notice Urals ridge in play early
Without looking at the eps I bet it stinks in the day 10-16.Dang when the wheels falls off of that sort of pattern that’s basically it, wonder how long the block will stay
Without looking at the eps I bet it stinks in the day 10-16.
Idk I mean the theme since like september has been a ural ridge. Without changing much forcing it seems like we would cycle back through something similar to what we have seen recently. This time though climo would favor a better chance at snow before we went back to poop. The gefs are starting to show some life to the mjo that could be a wildcard here.
Also to add to my post above the pac jet retracting allows for the heights in the north atlantic to retrograde into a more classic and impactful for us orientation
Mjo hanging around in the warmer phase not helpingPNA looks like it will stay positive, NAO will go strongly negative, and the AO will stay strongly negative. I guess on paper, or modeled output, this is the look we want. But as others have stated, other pattern details (W/E NAO, EPO) can turn the tables.
CPC - Climate Weather Linkage: Teleconnections (noaa.gov)
Hour 624 .... ?The gefs extended goes with a classic nina transformation to a NPAC ridge, -PNA and southeast ridge, I still think this gets pushed back especially given the SSWE and displacement, but I think we’ll eventually find this pattern again given in almost every nina I know, we eventually get this View attachment 60758View attachment 60759
We’re eventually gonna switch to a canonical nina patternHour 624 .... ?
That S/W looks stout. Will we have the cold air?We buying the 12z GFS? View attachment 60765
That S/W looks stout. Will we have the cold air?
Mo cold air whatsoeverWe buying the 12z GFS? View attachment 60765