ForsythSnow
Moderator
Here is the WPC's 7th day for snow/sleet. If the models trend colder, that area will likely shift southeast, which would make us all happy.
-
Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!
Pattern January 2017 Discussion
- Thread starter SD
- Start date
No. The more consolidated and stronger this system is the more likely it is to be northwest. If you want snow to see the snow line farther south you want the system to trend a little slower and a little weaker.NorthGAWinterWx link said:
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Stormlover
Member
From HSV:
The constantly reinforced
cold airmass will create a wintry precipitation scenario as several
weak undulations within the prevailing southwesterly flow provide
forcing combined with mid-level saturation overrunning this airmass.
Though it is difficult to ascertain the timing of this wintry
precipitation, have incorporated at least a mix of freezing rain,
ice pellets, and snow for the Wednesday night through Friday time
frame. The airmass appears to be reinforced at least once, but the
other complication is that the surface freezing line is either close
to or atop the TN Valley. With this area in the transition zone, the
forecast for wintry precip will become even that more difficult. The
one thing that does continue to be a common denominator is the
following: expect a significant and prolonged (few days) much below
normal temperature event coupled with the possibility for wintry
precip.
The constantly reinforced
cold airmass will create a wintry precipitation scenario as several
weak undulations within the prevailing southwesterly flow provide
forcing combined with mid-level saturation overrunning this airmass.
Though it is difficult to ascertain the timing of this wintry
precipitation, have incorporated at least a mix of freezing rain,
ice pellets, and snow for the Wednesday night through Friday time
frame. The airmass appears to be reinforced at least once, but the
other complication is that the surface freezing line is either close
to or atop the TN Valley. With this area in the transition zone, the
forecast for wintry precip will become even that more difficult. The
one thing that does continue to be a common denominator is the
following: expect a significant and prolonged (few days) much below
normal temperature event coupled with the possibility for wintry
precip.
Would a more consolidated system give more opportunity for I-20 and I-85 folks to get some accumulation?ATLWxFan link said:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Yes, along and north of I-20, I-85 would get more snow from the consolidated system. NW GA and NE GA would get overrunning then some winter wx from the consolidated system if there will be one.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
Stormlover
Member
6Z GFS
Storm5
Member
Would a more consolidated system give more opportunity for I-20 and I-85 folks to get some accumulation?NorthGAWinterWx link said:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Yes, along and north of I-20, I-85 would get more snow from the consolidated system. NW GA and NE GA would get overrunning then some winter wx from the consolidated system if there will be one.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
[/quote]
there is no guarantee that i20 would see snow from a consolidated low in fact if the low wrapped up too much it would most likely yank inland some. I live along i20 , I for sure as hell don't want a true low. give me overrunning all day everyday.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Tarheel1
I TOLD YALL IT WASN’T GOING TO SNOW
Member
2024 Supporter
2017-2023 Supporter
2025 Supporter
Would a more consolidated system give more opportunity for I-20 and I-85 folks to get some accumulation?Storm5 link said:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Yes, along and north of I-20, I-85 would get more snow from the consolidated system. NW GA and NE GA would get overrunning then some winter wx from the consolidated system if there will be one.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
[/quote]
there is no guarantee that i20 would see snow from a consolidated low in fact if the low wrapped up too much it would most likely yank inland some. I live along i20 , I for sure as hell don't want a true low. give me overrunning all day everyday.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
And twice on Sunday!!?
Anyway, s it looks now from overnight Euro and para GFS, I would be excited in N MS, N AL, N GA, looks like y'all could do better than the Carolinas! Long way to go
Storm5
Member
Re: January 2017 Discussion
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Yes, along and north of I-20, I-85 would get more snow from the consolidated system. NW GA and NE GA would get overrunning then some winter wx from the consolidated system if there will be one.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
[/quote]
there is no guarantee that i20 would see snow from a consolidated low in fact if the low wrapped up too much it would most likely yank inland some. I live along i20 , I for sure as hell don't want a true low. give me overrunning all day everyday.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
And twice on Sunday!!?
Anyway, s it looks now from overnight Euro and para GFS, I would be excited in N MS, N AL, N GA, looks like y'all could do better than the Carolinas! Long way to go
[/quote]
I agree , long way to go with this. way too many people giving up ( especially georgia folks). way too much over analysing ( much of which does not even make meteorological sense ) ......
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Would a more consolidated system give more opportunity for I-20 and I-85 folks to get some accumulation?Tarheel1 link said:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Yes, along and north of I-20, I-85 would get more snow from the consolidated system. NW GA and NE GA would get overrunning then some winter wx from the consolidated system if there will be one.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
[/quote]
there is no guarantee that i20 would see snow from a consolidated low in fact if the low wrapped up too much it would most likely yank inland some. I live along i20 , I for sure as hell don't want a true low. give me overrunning all day everyday.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
And twice on Sunday!!?
Anyway, s it looks now from overnight Euro and para GFS, I would be excited in N MS, N AL, N GA, looks like y'all could do better than the Carolinas! Long way to go
[/quote]
I agree , long way to go with this. way too many people giving up ( especially georgia folks). way too much over analysing ( much of which does not even make meteorological sense ) ......
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Anyone East, South, and about 100 mi north of a true low would end up screwed. Really only people who would benefit is on the Nothwest quadrant, while the west side would have to wait until the low passes to transition to snow or a mix
Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk
Would a more consolidated system give more opportunity for I-20 and I-85 folks to get some accumulation?Storm5 link said:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Yes, along and north of I-20, I-85 would get more snow from the consolidated system. NW GA and NE GA would get overrunning then some winter wx from the consolidated system if there will be one.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
[/quote]
there is no guarantee that i20 would see snow from a consolidated low in fact if the low wrapped up too much it would most likely yank inland some. I live along i20 , I for sure as hell don't want a true low. give me overrunning all day everyday.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
I can understand that cause I live north of I-20 as well. The consolidated system may not even pull too far inland. We don't know that yet cause the models aren't picking up that consolidated low yet...well they are it's just not defined.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
Stormlover
Member
Spann put this out
Storm5
Member
welcome!Spurs up link said:
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Would a more consolidated system give more opportunity for I-20 and I-85 folks to get some accumulation?NorthGAWinterWx link said:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Yes, along and north of I-20, I-85 would get more snow from the consolidated system. NW GA and NE GA would get overrunning then some winter wx from the consolidated system if there will be one.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
[/quote]
there is no guarantee that i20 would see snow from a consolidated low in fact if the low wrapped up too much it would most likely yank inland some. I live along i20 , I for sure as hell don't want a true low. give me overrunning all day everyday.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
I can understand that cause I live north of I-20 as well. The consolidated system may not even pull too far inland. We don't know that yet cause the models aren't picking up that consolidated low yet...well they are it's just not defined.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
[/quote]
The models aren't hinting at a strong low because the height gradient in the east tightens which shears the western shortwave thus you get this low amplitude look. There are 2 ways in this look to get a stronger low First is a phased scenario where it's 100% depending on timing of the phase as to who gets rain or snow. The second option is what we saw with the 12z runs yesterday where the heights are more relaxed and there is the ability to have a stronger low pressure and room for amplification. The problem with this is it gives the SER the ability to push back and biases everything north.
You don't need a strong low here to generate a good amount of precipitation. The moist southwest flow aloft over top the air mass already in play will do well at generating precip. The addition of any energy from the west will act to enhance moisture plumes at times. The good thing about this look is horizontal temperature advection is kept at a minimum so we aren't likely to have a blazing warm nose aloft
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Oh be still my beating heart, the slightest possibility of a winter event without a blazing warm nose..... can it be? Do those still exist? Lol Great explanation by the way
whatalife
Moderator
Would a more consolidated system give more opportunity for I-20 and I-85 folks to get some accumulation?Storm5 link said:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Yes, along and north of I-20, I-85 would get more snow from the consolidated system. NW GA and NE GA would get overrunning then some winter wx from the consolidated system if there will be one.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
[/quote]
there is no guarantee that i20 would see snow from a consolidated low in fact if the low wrapped up too much it would most likely yank inland some. I live along i20 , I for sure as hell don't want a true low. give me overrunning all day everyday.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
While I like all snow a Consolidated low would more then likely cut on us...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ForsythSnow
Moderator
6Z Para down in snow totals, and the SER looks weaker as well. Also just saw the 18Z Para. Pure clown map.
As far as gulf lows are concerned, I found only three sub 1000 mb lows since the late 1800's that gave Atlanta 3.5+" of SN/IP. One was the ~977 mb 3/1993 blizzard, which was a very rare storm that gave major snow after a changeover from rain that occurred before it passed. The other two lows were in the high 990's.
For the remaining 30 something major SN/IP, the lowest pressure while in the gulf was 1000+. The average is not too far from 1010 mb and a few were as high as near 1020 mb. So, the best chance is from a weak low/overrunning. Some of the biggest SN/IP in Atlanta were from very weak lows (1015+).
The track is almost always through either SE GA or north FL though a few went through central FL. Actually, that is also a common track for many of the big well inland AL/NC/SC big snows as well.
For the remaining 30 something major SN/IP, the lowest pressure while in the gulf was 1000+. The average is not too far from 1010 mb and a few were as high as near 1020 mb. So, the best chance is from a weak low/overrunning. Some of the biggest SN/IP in Atlanta were from very weak lows (1015+).
The track is almost always through either SE GA or north FL though a few went through central FL. Actually, that is also a common track for many of the big well inland AL/NC/SC big snows as well.
sigwx
Member
[quote author=Stormlover link=topic=60.msg4787#msg4787 date=1483107289]
Spann put this out
That map almost looks like the 6z CMC hour 192
Spann put this out
That map almost looks like the 6z CMC hour 192
Stormlover
Member
CMC doesn't have a a 6Z, just 0Z and 12Z, like the Eurosigwx link said:[quote author=Stormlover link=topic=60.msg4787#msg4787 date=1483107289]
Spann put this out
That map almost looks like the 6z CMC hour 192
Yesterday the Para had a consolidated lp cutter and last two runs more suppressed weaker overrunning event..... for NC folks the HP not in a good spot and cold really doesn't make it here like does west of the apps, still possible but just verbatim on those particular model runs. But the 06z Para almost had an east coast crawler, now if that happens....... anyway like other's have stated, I'd feel really good about my chances if I was in northern MS/AL and TN, western NC. Not to say the rest of us don't have a chance still all kinds of options on the table and that's all we can ask for right now imho
sigwx
Member
I know but I notice that the ECMWF looks just like the CMC. I should have said that to begin with, they are very close, very nice to see models that close 
Just pulled this from the GFS. As you can see there is a weak warm layer which is to be expected given the WSW flow aloft but its not a honking +5c nose, its pretty close to a snow sounding. There are a few systems that were similar to this one from the pastmetwannabe link said:
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Depending on where you are and the setup, the overrunning is horrible for my area (as of right now). That's why I'd rather have a Gulf low or a low that tracks just across the Gulf coast. The 06z GFS has a high just north of the OH river which would set up snow north, NW and western side of the consolidated low. A consolidated low would be better cause everyone would get snow. The SW flow would have more ice and IP rather than snow. The thickness values aren't even cold enough for snow during the SW flow. The best snow growth is -5c at 850mb.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
Storm5
Member
Re: January 2017 Discussion
you can get big snows with a SW flow .
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
saying a consolidated low would give everyone snow is not a correct statement .NorthGAWinterWx link said:
you can get big snows with a SW flow .
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Just pulled this from the GFS. As you can see there is a weak warm layer which is to be expected given the WSW flow aloft but its not a honking +5c nose, its pretty close to a snow sounding. There are a few systems that were similar to this one from the pastSD link said:
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
The sounding for krzz at the same time shows snow.... man what a thin line. I have a feeling someone will end up in a sweet spot, just barely cold enough for sn but enough moisture to get a decent thump.
NorthGAWinterWx link said:
Thanks for your nice contributions! Based on going through the old 850 mb maps of the biggest Atlanta snows since the 1950's, most were when the 850 mb temp was at or within a few degrees colder than 0C. Whereas -5C may offer the best snow growth, most storms were between -3C and 0C for the majority of the storm.
Also, please be careful when saying something like "everyone" would get snow with a consolidated low. There are some who live near the coasts, for example.
GaWx link said:
Thanks for your nice contributions! Based on going through the old 850 mb maps of the biggest Atlanta snows since the 1950's, most were when the 850 mb temp was at or within a few degrees colder than 0C. Whereas -5C may offer the best snow growth, most storms were between -3C and 0C for the majority of the storm.
Also, please be careful when saying something like "everyone" would get snow with a consolidated low. There are some who live near the coasts, for example.
[/quote]
I knew it was a bad idea to say everyone would get snow lol. But the majority of the southeast would get snow (based off of historical Gulf low snow events) coastal Carolina's would get snow on back edge of low and depending on track of low. Heck, the coastal NC can get good snows if the low amplifies and the low would have to be at the right place off shore.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
I'm curious about the pattern post 1/15 could get into something decent
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Re: January 2017 Discussion
you can get big snows with a SW flow .
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Agreed. About the only areas that benefit from a strong lp, are those of us northern southeastern peeps and those on the far nw fringes of the SE but everything has a line up just perfect
saying a consolidated low would give everyone snow is not a correct statement .Storm5 link said:
you can get big snows with a SW flow .
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
Agreed. About the only areas that benefit from a strong lp, are those of us northern southeastern peeps and those on the far nw fringes of the SE but everything has a line up just perfect
W
WeatherLC
Guest
Guests please register and join the discussion! It'll only take 30 seconds. You will also get to view other boards and get to enjoy the sites features.
Webberweather53
Meteorologist
GaWx link said:
Im not sure what the 3rd storm is but I know March 1-3 1942 is definitely one of the other storms that were sub 1000 and produced big snow in ATL. About 6-12" of snow was reported in the Atlanta metro, and the snowfall distributions were very similar to March 1993... 25" was reported on Mount Mitchell in NC and widespread areas of 16-24" were prevalent in the NC mountains, with a foot or more north & west of I-85. This storm in early March 1942 is eerily similar to March 1993 wrt track, intensity, time of the year, and snowfall, just a tad weaker... They're essentially twins lol.
March 3 1942 North America Surface Maps (NOAA 20CRv2)
March 12-14 1993 North America Surface Maps (NCEP NCAR Reanalysis)
March 1-4 1942 snowfall (NCDC RSI)
March 2-3 1942 NC Snow map
VegasEagle
Member
Is it a good time to start a seperate thread on this?SD link said:
Hi! I have just joined from Tunnel Hill, Ga (Catoosa county just south of Chattanooga, TN). I don't know much about the science of the weather, but I am fascinated with it. Thanks for providing a place that people can go to learn more about how weather works!
One quick question... what is SER?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
One quick question... what is SER?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is it a good time to start a seperate thread on this?vegaseagle link said:
[/quote]
I don't see why not
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Southeast ridgejgee322 link said:
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Webberweather53
Meteorologist
Is it a good time to start a seperate thread on this?vegaseagle link said:
[/quote]
I'm guessing we probably won't until tomorrow or the following day, I think most here generally agreed upon anything inside 144 HR being the cut-off for throwing up another thread