No worries man. I appreciate your post. When models show cold, you rarely get any dissenting comments (like, “you just can’t trust the models”). But when they show warm, you tend to see a lot of posts, tweets, facebookings, blogs, etc. talking about how you can’t trust the models for this or that reason. I have been observing weather and models long enough to know that the truth of the matter is that you can’t trust long range model output most of the time, regardless of what they’re showing. On the other hand, I have seen far and away more instances of warmth in the LR verifying than cold in the LR verifying. Why is this? Maybe it’s because the models have a cold bias, like you said. Maybe it’s because the background climate is generally warm. Maybe it’s one particular variable or another like the mjo or ssw or whatever. And maybe that variable or combination of variables changes from season to season. But whatever it is, it’s easier for the models to be right in the LR when they show warm than when they show cold.I see a lot of frustration and some terrible modeling by most models for the 8-10 day and especially the 10-15 day time frame. They can’t be trusted and that’s 100% correct logic.
Now, how you interpret that is up for debate. Heat does largely win out most of the time, and a lot of models have a cold bias in general, but I’ll have to disagree on trusting a full on torch for the LR just because heat is more believable to the eye.
If the models were showing a spectacular pattern but have been all over the place, the same people will be yelling not to trust the 10-15 cold because the models are inconsistent. So why the double standard?
Also, CR don’t take this the wrong way. We go way back. Just seeing a lot of the same stuff on twitter too..calling out the optimistic folks. I don’t really get it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That said, you’re right, the models can’t be 100% trusted in the LR regardless of what they’re showing. But if they’ve been showing warm and we have been warm and they’re continuing to show warm, I think the best course of reason is to suspect that more warmth is on the way, unless there is some very compelling reason to believe otherwise.
Everyone that has done research this year will say that the back half of the winter was the part that was expect to be colder. That gives some reason to suspect (or hope) the models may be off at the longer leads regarding the warmth. We’ll see, but it is going to have to start showing up in the next couple of weeks at the LR if that’s going to pan out, unless we’re defining the last half of winter to mean the second half of Feb and March. I hope that’s not the case.