View attachment 9655 18z gfs does not completely close off the upper level disturbance until it's over central nc, also more faster/progressive on this run but it is the 18z
I haven’t seen any positive trends in any model for any period of time recently. I’ve seen some good patterns modeled infrequently out in la la land. But I haven’t seen anything trending positively on any model. The only real trend has been for a SSW to occur. How that ends up influencing the pattern is literally anyone’s guess.Seems like we’ve been seeing positive trends in modeling for like 4 weeks, and here we are , still looking longingly for a great pattern!
so close to something big for usPerfect look for areas west of the mountain on the fvs..View attachment 9656View attachment 9657
Wow saw that there were 3 pages new since I looked earlier and got excited..
Darkknight do you think areas in West Central Alabama around Tuscaloosa can have a chance as wellPerfect look for areas west of the mountain on the fvs..View attachment 9656View attachment 9657
Stormlover do you think central Alabama have a chance as wellso close to something big for us
AKA: The FixerI haven’t seen any positive trends in any model for any period of time recently. I’ve seen some good patterns modeled infrequently out in la la land. But I haven’t seen anything trending positively on any model. The only real trend has been for a SSW to occur. How that ends up influencing the pattern is literally anyone’s guess.
Regarding the NAO discussion, a couple of things come to mind. First, the term “Southeast” refers to a large area. It moves me to wonder if the same correlations hold true for, say, western TN or northern MS as Charleston, SC and Raleigh, NC? My guess is that it would be easier to get more frequent winter storms in western and northern areas of the SE than more eastern and southern areas without a -NAO.
Secondly, the -NAO suppresses the height field, shunting the jet southward, and slows the flow. Just on its face, that seems like a good background to have in the southeast. I don’t take that to mean we can’t have winter storms without it, but my experience, particularly over the last several years of -EPO/+PNA conditions, tells me that without a mechanism in place to suppress the flow, eastern and southern areas in particular are going to be mixy and sloppy most of the time.
Stormlover do you think central Alabama have a chance as well
Darkknight do you think areas in West Central Alabama around Tuscaloosa can have a chance as well
It's fine to ask once, but every few runs or so and two posts in a row is a bit much. Please refrain from asking constantly.Stormlover do you think central Alabama have a chance as well
I haven’t seen any positive trends in any model for any period of time recently. I’ve seen some good patterns modeled infrequently out in la la land. But I haven’t seen anything trending positively on any model. The only real trend has been for a SSW to occur. How that ends up influencing the pattern is literally anyone’s guess.
Regarding the NAO discussion, a couple of things come to mind. First, the term “Southeast” refers to a large area. It moves me to wonder if the same correlations hold true for, say, western TN or northern MS as Charleston, SC and Raleigh, NC? My guess is that it would be easier to get more frequent winter storms in western and northern areas of the SE than more eastern and southern areas without a -NAO.
Secondly, the -NAO suppresses the height field, shunting the jet southward, and slows the flow. Just on its face, that seems like a good background to have in the southeast. I don’t take that to mean we can’t have winter storms without it, but my experience, particularly over the last se
Oh I'm sorry didn't mean to ask twice won't ask again didn't mean to upset you or anybodyIt's fine to ask once, but every few runs or so and two posts in a row is a bit much. Please refrain from asking constantly.