• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern Jammin' January

More work to be down for parts of GA but positive trends in FV-GFS, need a little better cold push and orientation coming down and that pop-up gulf low would be nice for it to develop a little sooner
 
Euro just crapped on everybodys mid week cutter so I guess nobody wants to talk about the potential here?
9C6AE17A-184C-4C2F-80A5-AC5BA73DE2A6.png
 
There’s potential sure. But hard to be excited when you don’t have a big high pressure just north of it. To lock in cold and keep it from cutting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm educatedly guessing that the projected trip of the MJO through moderate phases 4-5 is a net negative factor for the next 8 days or so though there are as always other factors to consider. Any other opinions about the MJO?
Down the road, the MJO should become a favorable factor, itself.

If I'm not mistaken, phases 4-5 are somewhat correlated to a SE ridge.
 
I wouldn't put much into any of the models right now...None of them are able to pick-up on anything consistent....You really can't get a good forecast past 3 days
 
FV3 is my model of choice. Look at how it has done for our system on the 20th. This is 168 hours out and the FV3 is locked in on a northern route track into WV.
1547752858985.png

Compare this with the 12z FV3 run only 60 hours out.
1547752883920.png

Meanwhile the Euro from the same 00z Sunday run has it too far south and slow.
1547752926714.png

IMO the performance of the FV3 7 days out to nail the LP track is incredibly impressive. It has also done this with both winter storms I've tracked for the NC area so far, picking up on the LP track and locking in before any other models do. It's the model of choice 7 days and under for me.
 
I'm educatedly guessing that the projected trip of the MJO through moderate phases 4-5 is a net negative factor for the next 8 days or so though there are as always other factors to consider. Any other opinions about the MJO?
Down the road, the MJO should become a favorable factor, itself.

If I'm not mistaken, phases 4-5 are somewhat correlated to a SE ridge.

Maybe so but there is no SER showing on any guidance currently


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm educatedly guessing that the projected trip of the MJO through moderate phases 4-5 is a net negative factor for the next 8 days or so though there are as always other factors to consider. Any other opinions about the MJO?
Down the road, the MJO should become a favorable factor, itself.

If I'm not mistaken, phases 4-5 are somewhat correlated to a SE ridge.
I agree with you. I think it will end up being a net negative until the SSW event's effects are more fully realized. I imagine if that aspect is real, the SSW, (and what I mean is that if it will end up influencing the pattern favorably), the models will have a difficult time resolving that dynamic, which would lead to quite a bit of variability in the LR.

The bottom line is this: If you believe that this winter has a high probability of being back-loaded from a cold and wintry weather standpoint, and you believe that the SSW event will positively influence the pattern, then pretty soon, the models will quit taking away the blocking in the LR and start to lock in a cold look, at least for a period. Even the ensembles are bouncing around with the blocking.

I think the MJO will be a factor until that signal is overwhelmed by something else, which all seems to start converging in 1-2 weeks. Fortunately, it's amplitude doesn't seem to be as high as it could be.

If we get to Feb 1, and we're still seeing just transient cold shots as far as the eye can see, I think we will have a pretty good handle on how the winter of 2018-2019 will go down.
 
b6b053e9d93a73c1c495349bc8f51a56.jpg
207dd405237deb86a3a91bbfaaae4933.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
For those of us who like the pretty clown maps, this run of the EPS looks better than any I've seen recently. Because it has over 50 members, it's difficult to get a large snow mean to show without there being a reasonable amount of support from multiple members. This is a significant increase over 0z and yesterday's 12z run. I will check a few of the city meteograms shortly.
1547756494096.png
 
No matter what period you choose, the vortex on the Pacific side of the arctic has been progressively intensifying on the Euro ensemble of late contributing to the increasingly positive AO as verification closes in. This is not a trend I want to see continue.


View attachment 11581
View attachment 11580
View attachment 11579
Don’t want to see that either but could that also be a wash since we don’t want overpowering cold press with a full arctic dump?
 
No matter what period you choose, the vortex on the Pacific side of the arctic has been progressively intensifying on the Euro ensemble of late contributing to the increasingly positive AO as verification closes in. This is not a trend I want to see continue.


View attachment 11581
View attachment 11580
View attachment 11579

I wonder if the EPS has an inherent -AO bias like the GEFS appears to have had per watching it over the years (day 14 GEFS had averaged near -0.5 AO bias last few months). Do you know? Or is this just a relatively rare exception for the EPS?
 
Last edited:
Yep, we're progressively losing the -AO with each successive run of the EPS. Heights are falling as verification approaches in the Pacific-Arctic.
View attachment 11576
The one obvious caveat I forgot to mention here though is while this probably hurts us in the short term, if the cyclonic wave break over the Aleutians is in the right place and orientation it can amplify the ridge over the Rockies and eventually lend itself to a bigger block that eventually moves up towards Alaska thereafter but this is somewhat speculative on my part and if it came to fruition it would be right at the very end of January or early February
 
The one obvious caveat I forgot to mention here though is while this probably hurts us in the short term, if the cyclonic wave break over the Aleutians is in the right place and orientation it can amplify the ridge over the Rockies and eventually lend itself to a bigger block that eventually moves up towards Alaska thereafter but this is somewhat speculative on my part and if it came to fruition it would be right at the very end of January or early February
Would ridging over the Rockies with such an orientation give a favorable pattern to all of the deep South with a -EPO?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top