We saw this at least once last year and the year before, where there was a lot of wanting to toss model tracks because they weren't initializing the core pressure properly. It turned out to be unwise. Not saying that it can't matter, but it's good to take into account the whole picture.How does the euro starting off with a much weaker storm then what it really is affect the model run?
I hear ya....but....they input new values with new data. It sometimes generate a completely different results from day to day.Totally unrealistic. Look at the panel the day before (below). No way you go from 995 over inland Northern FL on Wednesday to 954 as a CAT 4/5 at Charleston the next day.
View attachment 22498
A lot of good stuff.Also in Wiki!!!!! Has been for ages ...
Which means ... do not put eggs in a one run of one model basket, and that things may look different tomorrow ... but I think I said that somewhere before ... trends are what you should look at when sticking to models ...I hear ya....but....they input new values with new data. It sometimes generate a completely different results from day to day.
I hear ya....but....they input new values with new data. It sometimes generate a completely different results from day to day.
I hear ya.....it was an outlier until Euro. How they got there will likely change in the next run. To Phil's point, its leading a trend of 2 right now. More north and East.I wasn't referring to the landfall at CHS. I was referring to the same model run with the prior hours leading up to it. Have a look. It shows 995 a bit west of Jacksonville, FL over land and having been over land and the next day a 954mb hurricane at Charleston. It just isn't possible. The storm would have to have been over water either scraping the coast or come in direct from the ocean to have a 954 mb at Charleston.
I think you say it every day...lol...thanks for saying it. We all forget from time to time.Which means ... do not put eggs in a one run of one model basket, and that things may look different tomorrow ... but I think I said that somewhere before ... trends are what you should look at when sticking to models ...
Talk too much ... occupational hazard ...I think you say it every day...lol...thanks for saying it. We all forget from time to time.
??I think we need another day to see what the models are doing before you call anything definite or a trend. We all should know better than to hop on one bandwagon and go with it because it favors "our solution". Step back and take a logical approach, and you'll see that We haven't had anything more than a general idea since yesterday. Troughs are hard to forecast and so are high strengths. That's what all the weather balloon launches were for, but if I remember correctly, it wasn't up north as well. If we had them up there I would be more confident in saying a curve is possible but from what I can tell we have no sampling up there.
Damn, FS ... Bingo (and thanks!) ... PhilI think we need another day to see what the models are doing before you call anything definite or a trend. We all should know better than to hop on one bandwagon and go with it because it favors "our solution". Step back and take a logical approach, and you'll see that We haven't had anything more than a general idea since yesterday. Troughs are hard to forecast and so are high strengths. That's what all the weather balloon launches were for, but if I remember correctly, it wasn't up north as well. If we had them up there I would be more confident in saying a curve is possible but from what I can tell we have no sampling up there.
SUMMARY OF 500 PM EDT...2100 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...25.0N 70.7W
ABOUT 420 MI...675 KM E OF THE NORTHWESTERN BAHAMAS
ABOUT 595 MI...960 KM E OF WEST PALM BEACH FLORIDA
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...115 MPH...185 KM/H
PRESENT MOVEMENT...WNW OR 300 DEGREES AT 9 MPH...15 KM/H
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...970 MB...28.65 INCHES
Might I add: if you live anywhere along the east coast in the states of FL, GA, SC, or NC, you should already have a bug out plan to move inland. If you don't, then get busy. The accuracy of the models is not precise enough to give you 3-5 days to get something setup.I think we need another day to see what the models are doing before you call anything definite or a trend. We all should know better than to hop on one bandwagon and go with it because it favors "our solution". Step back and take a logical approach, and you'll see that We haven't had anything more than a general idea since yesterday. Troughs are hard to forecast and so are high strengths. That's what all the weather balloon launches were for, but if I remember correctly, it wasn't up north as well. If we had them up there I would be more confident in saying a curve is possible but from what I can tell we have no sampling up there.
Big change to the H....moved to the coast.