• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Learning Global Warming facts and fiction

Status
Not open for further replies.
SMB_curves_LA_EN_20220619-top-1.png


Greenland is gaining mucho hielo...
 
DTB247 said:
You need to get off the train asap, too many ppl holding us back.
Click to expand...
I hope there are billions of people holding back the "green" agenda. I hope that 100 million people vote out the current regime and the Democrats take a huge hit, from which they never recover. The global climate change due to man is a freaking lie and needs to be exposed! I'm sorry you fell for it, hook, line and sinker. It's not too late to reverse course and accept reality. Reality is going to smack you in the face at some point. The faster you go in the wrong direction, the more damage it will do when it collides.
 
DTB247 said:
You need to get off the train asap, too many ppl holding us back.
Click to expand...
I will always fight to stop the "greenies". I will burn some wood and rubish, today, just because you don't want me to. Getting ready to burn through two chords of wood this winter as well. Plan on cutting down some more 80 year old red maples this fall. Increase my garden space and gather up even more firewood for the hard times ahead! Burn, baby burn!

Now what I won't do is use insecticides, herbicides and fungicides on my land. Bio-toxicity is a very real threat and we need to do more to limit contamination of our soil, water and air. CO2 is not pollution it is plant food.
 
weatherfide said:
I will always fight to stop the "greenies". I will burn some wood and rubish, today, just because you don't want me to. Getting ready to burn through two chords of wood this winter as well. Plan on cutting down some more 80 year old red maples this fall. Increase my garden space and gather up even more firewood for the hard times ahead! Burn, baby burn!

Now what I won't do is use insecticides, herbicides and fungicides on my land. Bio-toxicity is a very real threat and we need to do more to limit contamination of our soil, water and air. CO2 is not pollution it is plant food.
Click to expand...
Nice, because there's been no correlation shown between CO2 concentrations and ocean acidification, oh wait.... Take care troll
 
DTB247 said:
Nice, because there's been no correlation shown between CO2 concentrations and ocean acidification, oh wait.... Take care troll
Click to expand...
There is no way to discuss this with people for whom CO2 is "sinful" and people are judged to be good or evil based on their desire to remove CO2 or not worry about it. AGW is a freaking religion now with you people. No new information will ever change your minds and will only be twisted and warped to fit your AGW doctrine. CO2 concentrations follow the solar cycles and there is nothing man can do to change any of it. It's best to use our limited resources to adapt. If you feel CO2 is so deadly to the Earth, why not remove yourself from the equation? Once the microbes finish releasing all of your stored carbon as CO2, you will be done emitting harmful gas and will be absolved of all of your sins.
 
weatherfide said:
There is no way to discuss this with people for whom CO2 is "sinful" and people are judged to be good or evil based on their desire to remove CO2 or not worry about it. AGW is a freaking religion now with you people. No new information will ever change your minds and will only be twisted and warped to fit your AGW doctrine. CO2 concentrations follow the solar cycles and there is nothing man can do to change any of it. It's best to use our limited resources to adapt. If you feel CO2 is so deadly to the Earth, why not remove yourself from the equation? Once the microbes finish releasing all of your stored carbon as CO2, you will be done emitting harmful gas and will be absolved of all of your sins.
Click to expand...
Let's please try and not be the kind of weather board that suggests other members kill themselves if we don't agree with them. Thanks for the help.

I'll take, "Things I never thought I'd have to say in an online weather forum" for $500.
 

Atmospheric Moisture Increase | Climate Signals

A warmer atmosphere holds more moisture—about 7 percent more per 1.8°F (1°C) of warming—and scientists have already observed a significant increase in atmospheric moisture due to the air’s ability to hold more moisture as it warms. Storms supplied by climate change with increasing moisture are...
www.climatesignals.org www.climatesignals.org
 
We have to find a way to temper (no pun intended) global temperature rise. UK, what's next......Greenland? Siberian temps (Khatanga, Yakutsk) have been well above normal as well. As much as I disagree with all of the policies of the left, I don't want to concede that Al Gore was right.

Sidenote, I've mowed my grass twice this season. Rain has been very limited (We haven't scored on storms even when they are (rarely) widespread in central NC). Watersheds in Texas are at roughly 50 percent, as with a lot of the SE. With all of this heat and drought, I'd like to know what regions are below normal temp wise. Can't say this stuff is unprecedented, but it sure as heck is rare to have 100 plus degrees in the areas that are receiving it outside of the four corners region of the SW.
 
Why is the air temperature over the oceans at the equator below normal? It's consistent, growing in area and magnitude. Does this line up with AGW theory? The southern hemisphere is getting blasted with much below normal cold weather systems, too.
 

Attachments

  • gfs_T2ma_global_fh144-198.gif
    gfs_T2ma_global_fh144-198.gif
    1.6 MB · Views: 7
weatherfide said:
Why is the air temperature over the oceans at the equator below normal? It's consistent, growing in area and magnitude. Does this line up with AGW theory? The southern hemisphere is getting blasted with much below normal cold weather systems, too.
Click to expand...
Nice checks & balances to the 100f temps in UK and western Europe. I dont care about the rare occurences as long as they dont become commonplace.

It was 70 degrees at Clingmans Dome Sat afternoon. Felt like a different world than the 96 in Gatlinburg.
 
The daily record was almost doubled and last time it was from hurricane remnants in 1915. Just shows how much more moisture is in the atmosphere.

www.usatoday.com

1 dead after 'historic' rainfall causes flash flooding in St. Louis area

One person died after being pulled from a flooded vehicle Tuesday as record rainfall sparked flash flooding in St. Louis and other parts of the state.
www.usatoday.com
 
There is zero reliable science that Climate Change isn't at least majority man made right now. It's so weird that intelligent people on a weather board still fall into these anti-logic traps. I think they all hate leftists and Greta Thunberg 'woke' types so much they just ignore the actual 100% reliable science and need to crap on the entire theory of AGW. Weird, but okay. Trust me, I can't stand the Leftists who think every strong hurricane or heat wave is PROOF of Climate Change too.. They are a distraction. But the core science is pretty much settled. Ain't it?
 
slllord said:
There is zero reliable science that Climate Change isn't at least majority man made right now. It's so weird that intelligent people on a weather board still fall into these anti-logic traps. I think they all hate leftists and Greta Thunberg 'woke' types so much they just ignore the actual 100% reliable science and need to crap on the entire theory of AGW. Weird, but okay. Trust me, I can't stand the Leftists who think every strong hurricane or heat wave is PROOF of Climate Change too.. They are a distraction. But the core science is pretty much settled. Ain't it?
Click to expand...
I agree completely. I for one do believe there is man made right now, though I do question just based on historical trends in climate, how much of it is man made. I really feel that there would be fewer deniers on this if some people didn’t try to link every single extreme weather event directly to climate change.
 
Chazwin said:
I agree completely. I for one do believe there is man made right now, though I do question just based on historical trends in climate, how much of it is man made. I really feel that there would be fewer deniers on this if some people didn’t try to link every single extreme weather event directly to climate change.
Click to expand...
All weather is linked as it's happening in a warming climate. If you took 2 Earths and modeled them with one having preindustrial GHG levels and the other current levels the patterns would be totally different. (They are doing this now for research) It's like trying to compare weather on 2 different planets.
 
BHS1975 said:
The daily record was almost doubled and last time it was from hurricane remnants in 1915. Just shows how much more moisture is in the atmosphere.

www.usatoday.com

1 dead after 'historic' rainfall causes flash flooding in St. Louis area

One person died after being pulled from a flooded vehicle Tuesday as record rainfall sparked flash flooding in St. Louis and other parts of the state.
www.usatoday.com
Click to expand...
Important to note that the areas that flooded were existing flood plains that were protected behind a levee. They were protected from the rivers, but not run-off from precipitation. This wouldn't have been news if people would stop building in flood plains. You could make the case that the levees actually caused the flooding this time because the water could not run off freely into the rivers.
 
slllord said:
There is zero reliable science that Climate Change isn't at least majority man made right now. It's so weird that intelligent people on a weather board still fall into these anti-logic traps. I think they all hate leftists and Greta Thunberg 'woke' types so much they just ignore the actual 100% reliable science and need to crap on the entire theory of AGW. Weird, but okay. Trust me, I can't stand the Leftists who think every strong hurricane or heat wave is PROOF of Climate Change too.. They are a distraction. But the core science is pretty much settled. Ain't it?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't say zero, actually if you go back through this whole thread you'd find some data to the contrary, also you would find that many of us so called "deniers" (as we're labeled) don't actually deny we're in a warming climate currently. What most of us question is how much is AGW and is it cyclical, I'm not convinced we have 100% solid evidence that what we are experiencing now has never occurred before in the history of this earth. Also I find it weird that intelligent people on a weather board, or anywhere for that matter, still fall for these settled science comments. Nothing could be more anti-science than saying it's settled science
 
slllord said:
There is zero reliable science that Climate Change isn't at least majority man made right now. It's so weird that intelligent people on a weather board still fall into these anti-logic traps. I think they all hate leftists and Greta Thunberg 'woke' types so much they just ignore the actual 100% reliable science and need to crap on the entire theory of AGW. Weird, but okay. Trust me, I can't stand the Leftists who think every strong hurricane or heat wave is PROOF of Climate Change too.. They are a distraction. But the core science is pretty much settled. Ain't it?
Click to expand...
I would not argue that humans have not influenced our environment. I doubt the magnitude and seriousness of the effects. Urban heat islands and other land use decisions have played a significant role. Burning carbon based fuels at the surface creates more plant food. I am concerned about burning jet fuel at altitude. Since CO2 is heavier than air, forcing it up high, where it doesn't naturally occur, may have enhanced effects. Why don't we ban air travel and see where that gets us? Close down all of the airlines? I say the correct response to the changing climate is to adapt, not prevent. It doesn't matter what is the primary driver of the change, the sun, humans, or volcanoes, we need to concentrate on adapting, using all available resources to create as much prosperity and opportunity for all. Removing carbon based fuel is not possible in the short term without huge geopolitical damage and revolts, which will lead to more wars. We are about to see it first hand.
 
weatherfide said:
I would not argue that humans have not influenced our environment. I doubt the magnitude and seriousness of the effects. Urban heat islands and other land use decisions have played a significant role. Burning carbon based fuels at the surface creates more plant food. I am concerned about burning jet fuel at altitude. Since CO2 is heavier than air, forcing it up high, where it doesn't naturally occur, may have enhanced effects. Why don't we ban air travel and see where that gets us? Close down all of the airlines? I say the correct response to the changing climate is to adapt, not prevent. It doesn't matter what is the primary driver of the change, the sun, humans, or volcanoes, we need to concentrate on adapting, using all available resources to create as much prosperity and opportunity for all. Removing carbon based fuel is not possible in the short term without huge geopolitical damage and revolts, which will lead to more wars. We are about to see it first hand.
Click to expand...
I disagree. The best path forward is to adapt and move toward carbon negative ASAP. It's already causing huge disruptions and will only get worse.
 
BHS1975 said:
I disagree. The best path forward is to adapt and move toward carbon negative ASAP. It's already causing huge disruptions and will only get worse.
Click to expand...
The attempt to reign in carbon use is causing the disruptions. Going carbon negative means killing billions of people, through starvation, war and disease. You have to be a genocidal maniac to want to restrict carbon emissions as a climate modification tool. Bring up viable alternatives while exploiting inexpensive energy dense fuels. Innovate and adapt is the only way. Demand destruction and restrictions will mean human misery and death.
 
The equatorial regions are below normal at 2m across the globe! So weird. Equator and south is really interesting. Could it be the effects of the Tonga eruption?
 

Attachments

  • gfs_T2ma_global_fh72-180.gif
    gfs_T2ma_global_fh72-180.gif
    3.1 MB · Views: 0
weatherfide said:
I would not argue that humans have not influenced our environment. I doubt the magnitude and seriousness of the effects. Urban heat islands and other land use decisions have played a significant role. Burning carbon based fuels at the surface creates more plant food. I am concerned about burning jet fuel at altitude. Since CO2 is heavier than air, forcing it up high, where it doesn't naturally occur, may have enhanced effects. Why don't we ban air travel and see where that gets us? Close down all of the airlines? I say the correct response to the changing climate is to adapt, not prevent. It doesn't matter what is the primary driver of the change, the sun, humans, or volcanoes, we need to concentrate on adapting, using all available resources to create as much prosperity and opportunity for all. Removing carbon based fuel is not possible in the short term without huge geopolitical damage and revolts, which will lead to more wars. We are about to see it first hand.
Click to expand...
The "creates plant food" argument is a bit ignorant when you consider the fact we're constantly clear cutting and deforesting at rapid rates. However half the oxygen still comes from the oceans from microbes, so depending on how well they adapt to sea changes depends on how our oxygen level will be over time. Regardless, we still have the greenhouse effect and we should work on reducing it in what ways we can.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top