• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry February 19-21, 2020 Winter Storm

Not sure you can call it a trend when they both have been seesawing the past 24 hours. Euro looked good yesterday, GFS didn't. Euro didn't look as good today, GFS looked better. Canadian looked better, too. They are all still going back and forth.
The trend is with the energy out in the SW that will eventually make or break this system, honestly they weren't light years apart with that but minor differences on when/if any energy kicked out made the difference between a significant storm and nothing. So while looking at the surface map and seeing blue or no blue over one particular spot may have been "back and forth" the energy out west has been trending more and more to a cutoff that will not head east. You really have got to learn to look at more than just the surface map
 
GFS Vort maps weren’t good either but it still had overrunning and plenty of precip thrown north. I’m just not completely sold that we need that thing to kick east and turn neutral or negative in order to get some weak overrunning here which has been the best case outcome from the beginning IMO. That’s just my opinion. Like I said, I feel like there’s some middle ground here View attachment 34313
Agreed that wave doesn't have to kick at all. The stuff over the lakes does have to be farther SW. You can easily get a couple of impulses in the STJ to move through with the energy trapped in the SW, you aren't going to get ---- with a N flow at 700mb like the Euro has
 
The trend is with the energy out in the SW that will eventually make or break this system, honestly they weren't light years apart with that but minor differences on when/if any energy kicked out made the difference between a significant storm and nothing. So while looking at the surface map and seeing blue or no blue over one particular spot may have been "back and forth" the energy out west has been trending more and more to a cutoff that will not head east. You really have got to learn to look at more than just the surface map

Whether or not the s/w actually fully emerges from the SW US doesn't really matter imo, you can still easily get an overrunning event w/ said wave getting squashed into Mexico (Jan 19-20 1992 for ex), the northern stream suppresses the storm more on this run
 
Some people are approaching this system as if we're expecting some sort of miller A or classic setup. It isn't a classic setup. NW trend of precip doesn't really apply here. Neither does "we need the shortwave to kick so we get a gulf low".

Well that's really not true because overrunning events are usually driven by modest large-scale warm air advection and isentropic upglide that's almost always under modeled because the vertical resolution of NWP models is insufficient to fully resolve it. See last week's storm in GA, TN, & SC as a prime example.
 
Whether or not the s/w actually fully emerges from the SW US doesn't really matter imo, you can still easily get an overrunning event w/ said wave getting squashed into Mexico (Jan 19-20 1992 for ex), the northern stream suppresses the storm more on this run
Yeah, I hear ya and trust me I'm not writing this off my no means... I just don't like the current trends with the upper levels and plus I'm being selfish, none of the overrunning events modeled have done much for me, dang it I need that energy to pop a coastal Lol
 
I don’t see any trend one way or another. This just looks to me like a quick hit because it will be moving fast. Looks like some flakes and some areas may get 1-3 inches but Of course that could change
 
I don’t see any trend one way or another. This just looks to me like a quick hit because it will be moving fast. Looks like some flakes and some areas may get 1-3 inches but Of course that could change
I disagree. If there’s actually a storm it won’t be a short duration.
 
Well that's really not true because overrunning events are usually driven by modest large-scale warm air advection and isentropic upglide that's almost always under modeled because the vertical resolution of NWP models is insufficient to fully resolve it. See last week's storm in GA, TN, & SC as a prime example.
Hey Webb I get we don't necessarily need that energy out west to kick east to have a storm but yesterday when it was further east the upper levels had more of a W/SW component allowing some moisture return, but with the energy holding back (and I know more NS dominant) those winds are W/NW thus dry.... is there no correlation between that energy being held back versus kicking out or is it all now NS dependent? If that makes sense.
 
With all the upgrades to Euro and GFS coupled with the lack of anything to track this winter. We have no basis to compare to for the Euro losing the storm or bring it back. Also the fact that the GFS has come thru on a storm or two. But we have no long range consistency or faith in the models to compare anything to.
 
Euro has precip breaking out 125 miles south of other guidance and everybody dives head first off the cliff at D6. Lol “Back in my day” this was completely fine. The storm signal is still there and it’s still strong enough to be a threat. Even on the less than ideal Euro run. If I were in CAE I would be rooting for something in between the GFS and Euro.
 
Hey Webb I get we don't necessarily need that energy out west to kick east to have a storm but yesterday when it was further east the upper levels had more of a W/SW component allowing some moisture return, but with the energy holding back (and I know more NS dominant) those winds are W/NW thus dry.... is there no correlation between that energy being held back versus kicking out or is it all now NS dependent? If that makes sense.

There's definitely more to it than that, the northern stream also matters here too. If the waves within the polar jet are slower and dig closer to the upper midwest instead of the Great Lakes, the return flow will be out of the W-SW & the ridge off the SE US will amplify regardless of the southern stream. There's also embedded sheared S/Ws within the southern branch of the jet ahead of the main disturbance that are nascent/hard to resolve especially this far out which will provide much of the impetus for precipitation breaking out. The wave actually emerging from the south-central Rockies matters more for generating a legit coastal, but for most of us in the SE US, a wave hanging back in the SW US with extremely sheared, fast moving, weak waves spitting out ahead of the SW US s/w is more than good enough to produce the solution most of us want if the longwave trough orientation is right.
 
UKMET precip maps were kind of a compromise between the Euro and GFS at 12z:


I would be thrilled with that look even if we were only 2-3 days out. If the synoptic pattern remains largely the same, overrunning setups in the SE US are very notorious for ticking NWward & trending stronger all the way down to the last minute and busting high for precip (& snow if it's cold enough)

Aside from last week's winter storm, February 11, 2014 is another classic, recent example. Most of southern NC was forecast to see 1" maybe 2", ended up w/ nearly 4" at my house in Cumberland County and New Bern picked up 10"



SE US radar Feb 11 2014 8am.gif

February 11 2014 NC Snowmap.gif


Here's the 500mb vort map the morning this storm started. Shortwave hanging back over the SW US, northern stream wave digging into the Lakes & New England w/ deep layer westerly flow at 500mb. Hardly the most obvious winter storm look but it produced big time over parts of southern NC. Light-moderate snow fell all day, and it was all snow start to finish in Fayetteville.


Screen Shot 2020-02-14 at 2.10.44 PM.png
 
Back
Top