Webberweather53
Meteorologist
Just stating the obvious: our shortwave is still 5-6 days away from approaching the front range of the Rockies, it's way too early to claim this storm is slipping away
The trend is with the energy out in the SW that will eventually make or break this system, honestly they weren't light years apart with that but minor differences on when/if any energy kicked out made the difference between a significant storm and nothing. So while looking at the surface map and seeing blue or no blue over one particular spot may have been "back and forth" the energy out west has been trending more and more to a cutoff that will not head east. You really have got to learn to look at more than just the surface mapNot sure you can call it a trend when they both have been seesawing the past 24 hours. Euro looked good yesterday, GFS didn't. Euro didn't look as good today, GFS looked better. Canadian looked better, too. They are all still going back and forth.
Agreed that wave doesn't have to kick at all. The stuff over the lakes does have to be farther SW. You can easily get a couple of impulses in the STJ to move through with the energy trapped in the SW, you aren't going to get ---- with a N flow at 700mb like the Euro hasGFS Vort maps weren’t good either but it still had overrunning and plenty of precip thrown north. I’m just not completely sold that we need that thing to kick east and turn neutral or negative in order to get some weak overrunning here which has been the best case outcome from the beginning IMO. That’s just my opinion. Like I said, I feel like there’s some middle ground here View attachment 34313
The trend is with the energy out in the SW that will eventually make or break this system, honestly they weren't light years apart with that but minor differences on when/if any energy kicked out made the difference between a significant storm and nothing. So while looking at the surface map and seeing blue or no blue over one particular spot may have been "back and forth" the energy out west has been trending more and more to a cutoff that will not head east. You really have got to learn to look at more than just the surface map
Some people are approaching this system as if we're expecting some sort of miller A or classic setup. It isn't a classic setup. NW trend of precip doesn't really apply here. Neither does "we need the shortwave to kick so we get a gulf low".
Yeah, I hear ya and trust me I'm not writing this off my no means... I just don't like the current trends with the upper levels and plus I'm being selfish, none of the overrunning events modeled have done much for me, dang it I need that energy to pop a coastal LolWhether or not the s/w actually fully emerges from the SW US doesn't really matter imo, you can still easily get an overrunning event w/ said wave getting squashed into Mexico (Jan 19-20 1992 for ex), the northern stream suppresses the storm more on this run
I disagree. If there’s actually a storm it won’t be a short duration.I don’t see any trend one way or another. This just looks to me like a quick hit because it will be moving fast. Looks like some flakes and some areas may get 1-3 inches but Of course that could change
I disagree. If there’s actually a storm it won’t be a short duration.
Hey Webb I get we don't necessarily need that energy out west to kick east to have a storm but yesterday when it was further east the upper levels had more of a W/SW component allowing some moisture return, but with the energy holding back (and I know more NS dominant) those winds are W/NW thus dry.... is there no correlation between that energy being held back versus kicking out or is it all now NS dependent? If that makes sense.Well that's really not true because overrunning events are usually driven by modest large-scale warm air advection and isentropic upglide that's almost always under modeled because the vertical resolution of NWP models is insufficient to fully resolve it. See last week's storm in GA, TN, & SC as a prime example.
Hey Webb I get we don't necessarily need that energy out west to kick east to have a storm but yesterday when it was further east the upper levels had more of a W/SW component allowing some moisture return, but with the energy holding back (and I know more NS dominant) those winds are W/NW thus dry.... is there no correlation between that energy being held back versus kicking out or is it all now NS dependent? If that makes sense.
UKMET precip maps were kind of a compromise between the Euro and GFS at 12z:
12z EPS has a stronger high, colder SE, and more suppression vs the 0Z. But I bet it will have some good members and I'm even wondering if it will have some deep SE wintry members (@pcbjr)?? Probably going to be close for some members anyway.
View attachment 34323
View attachment 34325
View attachment 34326