• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Feb. 19-20

I actually really like where the upstate is sitting right now. Model consensus is all snow and qpf of .15-.25. I think a tenth of inch is about our floor... but I suspect the southern wave will trend a little better up until go time. .2-.3 is not an unrealistic goal, in fact it may be the most likely outcome.

Plus we are squarely centered in the streamer potential Thursday morning that the Rgem/Aprege/Ukmet are gungho on. If those models are right some places will get 1-2 inches just from that.
 
Don't hate on sleet. If you want whatever falls to lie around for awhile and create the best sledding possible, an inch or 2 of snow compacted by an inch or two of sleet will hang around much longer than 4-6" of snow. I'm more interested in total qpf than ptype.
TW
You are right about sleet making for some great sledding, especially if you use the flat bottomed plastic sleds. Snowball fights can become a bit dangerous though. I'd rather have sleet than freezing rain any day of the week. If you held a gun to my head and told me to make a forecast I'd say that my area just south of Raleigh is going to see a lot of transitions back and forth between the different precipitation types during this storm. I'm thinking as of now that my home turf will get about two inches of snow and maybe an inch or so of sleet with a little freezing rain (less than .10) from this storm.
 
I actually really like where the upstate is sitting right now. Model consensus is all snow and qpf of .15-.25. I think a tenth of inch is about our floor... but I suspect the southern wave will trend a little better up until go time. .2-.3 is not an unrealistic goal, in fact it may be the most likely outcome.

Plus we are squarely centered in the streamer potential Thursday morning that the Rgem/Aprege/Ukmet are gungho on. If those models are right some places will get 1-2 inches just from that.
Yea the "streamers" are peaking my interest. Been a while since the Lee side has been able to catch those. Usually too amped up or the transfer pushes those well east of us.
 
Sort of ends up being better for Wake County-proper but that heavier band doesn’t extend much further west. Overall, not wholly different than the 06z run, which was in fact worse than I remembered. For MBY, the Euro is on the lower end of guidance now, only thing worse is the UKMET. This time yesterday, it was the highest guidance. 🤡
 
Well, the Euro sure complicated things. I thought it would reverse course like most of the other 12z. Maybe those earlier improvements @Myfrotho704_ mentioned will show up more downstream the next run?
I’m not sure how it didn’t improve. From an H5 standpoint it certainly did look better
 
If the cells coming inland off Myrtle Beach SC make it to Raleigh before the moisture in the west makes it to the foothills…then we are in big trouble of losing even more qpf than what models show along I77. Once the ground is white down east it’s game over for places like Mount Airy, altho that second chance Thursday could still coat the ground for the foothills.
 
Euro continues a theme from the other 12z globals in being more progressive/faster/flatter with the southern wave, hard to believe precip is largely over in the Coastal Plain with a slp still east or Myrtle Beach. Certainly something to keep your eye on, especially if the cams start to lock on to a similar solution. Based on 12z initialization, we still didn't have a complete conus raob capture of the energy in question, and likely won't for another 12hrs, however, as we are seeing, just small changes in timing, sharpness, etc, is having a moderate impact on final solution.
 
Last edited:

Similar to its previous run with the snowfall footprint, but southern parts of NC still need to prepare for an impactful ice storm imo. As mentioned, liking the upper level disturbance dropping behind the main system which quite a GEFS members showed on the 12z cycle. Hope most can score with this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Looks about the same as 9z no?

Sent from my SM-S156V using Tapatalk

It is similar, though it shifted south a bit. RDU goes from 3.0" to 4.2", for example. @RBR71's humble abode went from 5-6" into 6-7", as well. GSO 3.0" to 3.5"

I'm personally not a big fan of the product, but the NWS seems to use it a lot from what I can gather.
 
Can clearly see the big upper low in MN is crushing our southern energy. Subtly less negative. Hopefully that is the end of the SE trend...but I don't think it is.


View attachment 170049
It's a tale of two storms really with the overrunning precip with the southern wave and the low bombing off the coast with the pj wave. Stronger southern wave better for interior areas like WNC and upstate SC...not so much for eastern areas with WAA. Stronger pj wave and quicker phase will be ideal for eastern areas but there will be a serious cutoff as the coastal blows up.

At this pt Kinda hope the coast really bombs out quick and pull that comma head up to 77
 
12z (LR) HRRR (I know, laugh at me) is way more juiced than 12z Euro. I'm still not convinced that some of the globals are properly assessing all of the dynamics at play here. Very difficult forecast from all angles (dynamics/QPF, thermal profile, track of surface low, etc.) About to send out an email to 1,000 people and I honestly don't know what to say.
e31adffe-c769-4d37-90ce-daf06af90dce.gif
 
12z (LR) HRRR (I know, laugh at me) is way more juiced than 12z Euro. I'm still not convinced that some of the globals are properly all of the dynamics at play here. Very difficult forecast from all angles (dynamics/QPF, thermal profile, track of surface low, etc.) About to send out an email to 1,000 people and I honestly don't know what to say.
View attachment 170059
Just post the NBM and say “it’s now casting time”

They’ll like that
 
i don't feel horribly worried about qpf existing for US-1 east. not sure i've seen an event that's been on a drying trend continue that trend in the last 24-36 hours of modeling. i think concerns should be the placement of that seemingly narrowing band (idk, we'll see if it ends up as narrow as euro thinks) and warm nose extent
 
Globals 48 hours out...let's see who wins...

GFS/ICON are simliar and Canadian/Euro are simliar

View attachment 170061
I'll confess I have a hard time reckoning with the fact that despite the upper jet trending stronger, QPF is vanishing on the euro. Almost seems like we should be seeing a broader area of 1-3" or 2-4" with a tightening of the most significant banding in the eastern parts from a broader synoptic perspective.
ecmwf-deterministic-namer-z200_speed-1739793600-1739988000-1739988000-20.gif
 
What is causing the euro to dry slot that whole area from miss all the way through E-NC? Looking like all have it more robust way back west (Tex/OK/Ark)

GFS, NAM, Rap etc seem to be moving to filling that whole area back in more, while Euro/UK are dry slotting the whole area.

More Miller B-ish with early transfer or squashed then late bloomer or other?
 
12z (LR) HRRR (I know, laugh at me) is way more juiced than 12z Euro. I'm still not convinced that some of the globals are properly assessing all of the dynamics at play here. Very difficult forecast from all angles (dynamics/QPF, thermal profile, track of surface low, etc.) About to send out an email to 1,000 people and I honestly don't know what to say.
View attachment 170059
another globals vs cams storm
 
I'll confess I have a hard time reckoning with the fact that despite the upper jet trending stronger, QPF is vanishing on the euro. Almost seems like we should be seeing a broader area of 1-3" or 2-4" with a tightening of the most significant banding in the eastern parts from a broader synoptic perspective.
View attachment 170063
Go with what you know, meteorology over modelology, right?
 
What is causing the euro to dry slot that whole area from miss all the way through E-NC? Looking like all have it more robust way back west (Tex/OK/Ark)

GFS, NAM, Rap etc seem to be moving to filling that whole area back in more, while Euro/UK are dry slotting the whole area.

More Miller B-ish with early transfer or squashed then late bloomer or other?
Some of the Euro's issues have been with orientation with convection along and in the Gulf. It doesn't allow moisture transport to the N/NE.
 
12z (LR) HRRR (I know, laugh at me) is way more juiced than 12z Euro. I'm still not convinced that some of the globals are properly assessing all of the dynamics at play here. Very difficult forecast from all angles (dynamics/QPF, thermal profile, track of surface low, etc.) About to send out an email to 1,000 people and I honestly don't know what to say.
View attachment 170059
If the HRRR is right then, for the foothills region as I posted yesterday its within benchmark area that allows it to gain height and its angular approach allows for more moisture North and West instead of being flat. Now this doesn't mean that this will happen with cold air pressing, but it gives us a better chance
 
Back
Top